This signal has already been moved to breakeven. Please stop trading for now.
โค24๐5๐1

Channel
@mrqigoodluck
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
34,226subscribers
+9,093 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002133761864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mrqigoodluck |
| Description | Gold Traders Community (XAUUSD) |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mrqigoodluck |
Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 34,226 | +111 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 34,115 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 34,124 | +696 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 33,428 | +262 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 33,166 | +388 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 32,778 | +318 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 32,460 | +61 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 32,399 | -13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 32,412 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 32,399 | -63 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 32,462 | +401 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 32,061 | +438 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 31,623 | +123 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 31,500 | +23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 31,477 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 31,492 | +136 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 31,356 | +379 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 30,977 | +741 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 30,236 | +508 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 29,728 | first reading |
575 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 289 of 290 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 575 (7 August 2026 โ 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,434,250 |
| Reactions total | 11,091 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 21 September 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
18,503 reactions across 566 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 11,637 | 62.9% | |
| ๐ฅ | 2,729 | 14.7% | |
| ๐ | 1,820 | 9.84% | |
| ๐ | 402 | 2.17% | |
| ๐ | 309 | 1.67% | |
| ๐คฃ | 211 | 1.14% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 185 | 1% | |
| ๐ | 174 | 0.94% | |
| ๐ | 93 | 0.503% | |
| ๐ฏ | 83 | 0.449% | |
| ๐ | 73 | 0.395% | |
| ๐ค | 72 | 0.389% | |
| ๐ฅด | 69 | 0.373% | |
| ๐ซก | 65 | 0.351% | |
| ๐คจ | 61 | 0.33% | |
| ๐พ | 46 | 0.249% | |
| ๐ | 37 | 0.2% | |
| ๐คฉ | 35 | 0.189% | |
| โก | 33 | 0.178% | |
| ๐ | 27 | 0.146% | |
| 33 further kinds | 342 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 566 of the 575 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 18,503 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 575 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @mrqigoodluck. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 575 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
This signal has already been moved to breakeven. Please stop trading for now.
โค24๐5๐1
โญPremium win round 2: SELL 82-75 +70pips
โค13๐ฅ3๐ฅฐ2
Public wait me
โค90๐6๐ฅ5๐4๐4
Premium win round 1: +70 Pips 68 -> 75
โค35๐1
Good morning!! Have a nice day๐๐ฅ
โค180๐ฅ39๐13๐ฅฐ6๐6
โ ๏ธ SCAM WARNING โ PLEASE STAY ALERT โ ๏ธ โก๏ธThere are currently multiple Telegram channels using the names MR.QI, MR.QI โ GOOD LUCK, and other similar names to mislead and confuse users. โก๏ธScreenshots showing large profits, trading history, money transfers, or invitations to join VIP/Lifetime programs are NOT reliable proof. Scammers often use edited screenshots, forwarded messages, or fabricated images to gain your trโฆ
โค44๐9
Photo, posted without a caption
โค47๐ฅ9๐7
See you next week Join premium dm @mrqifx3 ๐ค
โค35๐ฅ9๐3
+200 Pips
โค25๐ฅ1
Win 2 round BUY tonight
โค23
63-71 +80 Pips
โค17๐ฅ3๐ฅด1๐1
Premium win BUY 68 - 73 +50 Pips
โค21
Showing the 12 most recent of 575 posts we hold for @mrqigoodluck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โMR.QI - GOOD LUCK๐ ๐โ (@mrqigoodluck), 34,226 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrqigoodluck.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.