Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 41 days, net +356. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 798–1,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 10:16
1,209
+12
12 Sept 2026, 20:37
1,197
+5
8 Sept 2026, 23:39
1,192
+50
4 Sept 2026, 01:20
1,142
-1
1 Sept 2026, 00:18
1,143
+65
29 Aug 2026, 00:54
1,078
+83
21 Aug 2026, 06:45
995
+39
14 Aug 2026, 22:28
956
+104
7 Aug 2026, 11:44
852
-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:18
853
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
236 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5215189065942461551
135
57.2%
custom 5262911362396352506
36
15.3%
custom 5260343216766478986
32
13.6%
custom 5262911319446679513
31
13.1%
custom 5242687920472611816
2
0.847%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mrsk1ko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Китики, я хотела бы попросить вас помочь мне продвинуть мой новый проект, который не связан с качеркой.
Я открыла чат(флуд) по всем фд,и хотела расфорсить тт аккаунт данного проекта.
Ник аккаунта: original bitches
Юз: original.bitches1
Если не находит по поиску вот ссылка на видео: https://www.tiktok.com/@original.bitches1?_r=1&_t=ZS-98cp6Im6XGX
Спасибо тем кто помог в продвижении ❤️
Китики, предоставляю вам список изменений в прайсе.
Заказы которые были начаты до того как мы поменяли прайс, остаются по старой цене без изменений.
Крутки (изменения только для тенге) : после 56 рп: 170тг>>150 тг
КРУТКИ В ЗВЕЗДАХ
До 56 рп- 15 зв (шт)
После 56 рп - 20 зв(шт)
Зачистка:
Фонтейн 10к тг>> 12к тг(+море древности)
Прокачка:
Добавляем цену за таланты:
1-5 ур таланта 3000 тг/500 руб
5-8 ур таланта 350…
Китики, открываю набор качеров(4/4; 2 в тг, 2 в руб)
🤩Требования:
- от 17 лет.
- ответственность и понимание дела
- опыт и отзывы(желательно,но если нет, не страшно)
🪙Условия принятия:
Проводится тестовый заказ на аккаунте и после добавляем в штат если все условия были соблюдены и соотношение скорости и качества работы было показано.
Писать мне в лс @Kr1ssnow
Ребята, вы не против если я буду называть вас китики?
Также вас ждут изменения:
Я создаю отдельный канал по ХСР
Вероятно и тт будет отдельный под ХСР
Так что не теряйте нас❤️
Ну что ж, сегодня (01.07) уже анонсируют снежную. Мы ждали этого 5 лет. И мы дождались,ура, товарищи!🤩
Также,16 июля нам будет год,вот уже год мы помогаем вам выбивать желанных персонажей, помогаем прокачивать ваши аккаунты.
Поэтому мы решили дропнуть ставку в казик 🤩
А именно, с 1 по 16 июля вас ждёт:
РОЗЫГРЫШ ПРИЗОВ
🔠 место - карточка с кавехом и альхайтамом
🔠 место - 1 луна
🔠 место - 1 луна
🔠 место - 10 круток …
Мы открываем набор качеров в тенге и рублях.
Условия те же что и раньше:
- строго 18+(подтверждение через документы. Лицо,имя и другие данные кроме даты рождения можете скрыть)
- отзывы(если нет, ничего страшного)
Требования: пройти стажировку на проверку быстроты и качества выполнения заказа.
Писать @MikoKatee
Места ограничены
𝐊𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 | ᴋᴀчᴇᴩы 🍸 pinned «Итак, 1 июля стартует новая версия. А это значит,я выпускаю наш небольшой десерт который будет доступен с 1.07 по 16.07!! Так как выходит много крутых персов из снежной и у нас будет годовщина,мы анонсируем самый первый прайс на крутки!!! С 1-55 рп: 65ТГ/10…»
Итак, 1 июля стартует новая версия. А это значит,я выпускаю наш небольшой десерт который будет доступен с 1.07 по 16.07!!
Так как выходит много крутых персов из снежной и у нас будет годовщина,мы анонсируем самый первый прайс на крутки!!!
С 1-55 рп: 65ТГ/10 РУБ
С 56 - 60 рп: 90ТГ/15 РУБ
ДЕЛАЙТЕ ПРЕДЗАКАЗ У МЕНЕДЖЕРА, УКАЗЫВАЙТЕ ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО ЧТО ЭТО АКЦИЯ.
ЖДЕМ 💋
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mrsk1ko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ребят к нам поступил вопрос нужны ли нам камеры в бел.рублях и евро. как вы считаете,среди нашей аудитории есть те кому было бы комфортно получать услуги в этих валютах?
Да, было здорово43%
Нет, не нужно37%
Кнопка администрации20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mrsk1ko named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@katekacher named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐊𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 | ᴋᴀчᴇᴩы 🍸” (@mrsk1ko), 1,209 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrsk1ko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.