Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for (مدیریت شهری تربت حیدریه)

Channel

(مدیریت شهری تربت حیدریه)

@mshthy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

459subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002345363865
TypeChannel
Username@mshthy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mshthy

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

459462460.56 August 2026 — 462 subscribers6 August 2026 — 462 subscribers20 August 2026 — 461 subscribers27 August 2026 — 460 subscribers4 September 2026 — 461 subscribers12 September 2026 — 459 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 459–462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 11:38459-2
4 Sept 2026, 13:21461+1
27 Aug 2026, 15:06460-1
20 Aug 2026, 07:02461-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:03462no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:08462first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5270.3%
😁1013.5%
👏56.76%
45.41%
👎22.70%
🔥11.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC44 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @torbatshar

💢مهندس مهدی زاهدی ؛ صریح ، شفاف و بی پرده از وضعیت شورای ششم با مردم سخن گفت و انصرافش را برای حضور در دوره هفتم شورا اعلام کرد‼️ 🔸مهدی زاهدی ، چهره پر تلاش، خلاق و دوست داشتنی شورای ششم شهر تربت حیدریه طی یک سلسله یادداشت و انتشار آن در شبکه های اجتماعی کمی از دغدغه ها و چالش هایی که در طول پنج سال حضورش در شورای ششم با آن روبرو بوده است سخن گفت. 🔺گفته هایش بر دل مخاطب می نشیند چون از عمق وجودش برخاسته است و ن

2

4 Jun 2026, 09:37 UTC154 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💢آیا «خیانت بانک شهر» علت عدم جذب ۸۰۰ میلیارد تومان اوراق مشارکت است؟ 🔸بحث پیرامون عدم جذب ۸۰۰ میلیارد تومان منابع مالی از محل اوراق مشارکت برای شهرداری تربت حیدریه، در روزهای اخیر وارد مرحله تازه‌ای شده است. شهردار تربت حیدریه پس از ناکامی در تأمین این منابع، بانک شهر را متهم کرده که علی‌رغم استحقاق شهرداری برای دریافت این اعتبار، از همکاری لازم خودداری کرده و عملاً به شهرداری «خیانت» کرده است. اما پرسش اصلی اینجاس

👏3

2 Jun 2026, 17:22 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @torbatshar

💢تغییر ریاست شورای ششم در سال آخر , الزام است یا نیاز ⁉️ 🔸با توجه به طولانی شدن ششمین دوره ی شورای های شهر و روستا به دلیل حوادث اخیر کشور و جنگ تحمیلی ۳۹ روزه آمریکا و اسرائیل علیه ایران و احتمال اینکه حداقل یکسال دیگر همین شورا سکاندار مدیریت شهری تربت حیدریه باشد ؛ الزام است تا ترکیب هیات رییسه و روئسای کمیسیونهای تخصصی شورای شهر تربت حیدریه در دوره ششم دستخوش بازنگری جدی شود. 🔺این شورا که در شرایط نامناسبی

👍2

1 Jun 2026, 17:36 UTC549 viewsread 6 August 2026

💢آقای شهردار تربت حیدریه ؛ چرا ۸۰۰ میلیارد تومان را جذب نکردید⁉️ 🔸حسین شعبانی ؛ رییس کمیسیون خدمات شهری شورای شهر تربت حیدریه سوال مهمی از وحید فرخ تبار، شهردار این شهر پرسید که کنجکاوی ما را نیز برانگیخته است. 🔺ظاهرا برای تربت حیدریه مثل ۱۵ شهر دیگر فرصتی جهت جذب ۸۰۰ میلیارد تومان در قالب اوراق مشارکت فراهم بوده که شهردار تربت حیدریه نتوانسته آن را جذب کند 🔸باید منتظر ماند و پاسخ جناب شهردار را در مورد این ماجر

14 May 2026, 18:40 UTC289 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💢ارتقای راه‌آهن تربت‌حیدریه؛ تصمیمی ملی، نه قربانی نگاه‌های محلی و زیاده خواهانه‼️ 🔸در حالی که توسعه زیرساخت‌های حمل‌ونقل ریلی یکی از ضرورت‌های انکارناپذیر رشد اقتصادی شرق کشور محسوب می‌شود، مخالفت برخی مسئولان شهرستان طبس با ارتقای راه‌آهن تربت‌حیدریه به اداره‌کل، جای تأمل و انتقاد جدی دارد. عجیب آن‌که این مخالفت نه بر پایه شاخص‌های فنی و کارشناسی، بلکه بیشتر بر نگرانی از کاهش سهم مدیریتی و اعتباری یک مجموعه اداری

22 Dec 2025, 19:10 UTC≈3,080 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💢آقای اکبریان یادتان هست چه گندی به شهرسازی تربت حیدریه زدید ؟؟؟ 🔸اخیرا مصاحبه ای از آقای سعید اکبریان با روزنامه خراسان دیدم که در کمال بی انصافی ، قانون نظام مهندسی ساختمان را به نفع مهندسان و به ضرر مردم خوانده است که لازم دیدم چند نکته را خدمت ایشان خاطر نشان کنم 🔺آقای اکبریان یادتان هست در اواخر دوره پنجم مدیریت شهری که متاسفانه سکاندار شهرداری تربت حیدریه شدید و با رواج پدیده پیش نویس پروانه و دور زدن نظام

👍10👏1

9 Dec 2025, 20:14 UTC839 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💢نه به رای ۵۱۹۳ نفر ؛ می خواهم شهردار شوم ‼️‼️ 🔸جناب آقای جمال یوسف زاده ؛ نمی دانم این را یک بی معرفتی به رای ۵۱۹۳ نفری بنامم که شما را به عنوان عضو شورای شهر تربت حیدریه انتخاب کردند ؛ یا خطای محاسباتی شما ؛ در هر صورتی شما به رای این افراد پشت کردید. 🔺 اینکه شهرداری روستای تازه شهر شده چخماق را به عضویت در شورای شهر تربت حیدریه ترجیح دادید ؛ یک علامت سوال بزرگ در اذهان ایجاد می کند و بهتر بود در این مورد حداق

👍7

4 Dec 2025, 17:30 UTC≈1,910 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‍ 💢مهدی خان جهانشیری ؛ بچه ی کف بازار ‼️ 🔸فقط چند ماه تا پایان ششمین دوره شورای شهر تربت حیدریه باقی مانده است و بنا داریم به رسم دوره های قبل ؛ عملکرد تک تک اعضای شورای شهر را در این روزهای پایان دوره دوره تحلیل و بررسی کنیم ، امیدوارم دوست داشته باشید. 🔺بی هیچ دلیلی شروع این سلسله یادداشتها به نام مهندس مهدی جهانشیری رقم خورد. جهانشیری یکی از بلاتکلیف ترین اعضای دوره ششم بود . نه انگیزه اش از ورود و نامزدی اش

😁5👍31👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mshthy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Oct 2025, 12:44 UTCAnonymous Poll174 voters

💢شما همایشی که اخیرا جهت معرفی فرصتهای سرمایه گذاری تربت حیدریه از سوی مدیران شهری تربت در هتل پردیسان مشهد برگزار شد ؛ چگونه ارزیابی می کنید ؟

  1. خوب بود ؛ فرصتی شد برای معرفی شهر و جذب سرمایه و به نفع توسعه شهری رقم خورد43%
  2. خوب نبود ؛ فرصتی شد برای نمایش اعضای شورا و شهردار و در کل هدر رفت منابع مالی شهرداری57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(مدیریت شهری تربت حیدریه)” (@mshthy), 459 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mshthy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.