Channel
@mt_agency
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
609subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002050405605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mt_agency |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mt_agency |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 609 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 602 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 607 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 600 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 591 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
131 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 35.9% | |
| 🤝 | 24 | 18.3% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 17.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 10.7% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 8.40% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 3.05% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 2.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Забудь про суточные лимиты — кабинеты MT Agency готовы к высоким бюджетам сразу🚀 Наши агентские кабинеты Facebook выдаются с уже наработанной историей и трастом — не с чистого листа, который FB режет стандартным стартовым лимитом. Путь «прогрева», который обычно занимает недели, кабинет уже прошёл до того, как попал к тебе. 🔵Открутка нужного бюджета сразу после модерации — без ручных заявок на повышение лимита и бе…
❤🔥1🔥1🤝1
Нашёл рабочую связку, а FB срезал разгон на суточном лимите?📉 Суточный лимит нового кабинета — это не решение алгоритма по конкретному офферу, а стартовый параметр, который Facebook присваивает по трасту аккаунта: возраст, история биллинга, платёжная дисциплина. ROI по офферу на это не влияет вообще. Отсюда две ловушки, в которые попадает почти любой баер на разгоне: 🔗Ловушка 1 — «прогрев» лимита занимает недели. …
❤🔥5👀3🤝3
Что вы обычно делаете, если объявление получило статус "learning limited"?
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какую performance goal вы чаще выбираете на адсете?
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как вы обычно тестируете крео после Andromeda?
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Andromeda не враг: почему аккаунты умирают не из-за алгоритма👀 После обновления Andromeda многие живут в одном цикле: пересобрать кампании, перезалить крео, поймать просадку ROAS, испугаться, повторить. На деле аккаунт проседает не потому, что алгоритм стал хуже, а потому что с ним перестали работать по его логике. 🔵Что важно для алгоритма. Bid strategy "highest volume or value" буквально называет два параметра: vo…
❤6🔥4🙏4
Математика реферала Как заставить нетворк работать на тебя?⛓️ Если у тебя есть знакомые баеры или команды — у тебя уже есть актив, который генерирует доход. Автоматически. MT Agency Referral Bot💸: 0,5% от спенда каждой команды, которую ты привёл. 🔵Команда спендит $10 000/мес → ты получаешь $50/мес 🔵Команда спендит $30 000/мес → $150/мес 🔵3 команды × $30 000 = $90 000 спенда → $450/мес 🔵5 команд × $50 000 = $250 00…
❤5🔥4🤝4
Всем привет! На связи Фил, Head of MT Agency FB👤 Последние дни весь рынок только об этом и говорит: реджекты, баны, у кого-то трафик почти в ноль. Жалобы отовсюду — и это объективно так, шторм у всех📉, не только у нас. 🔎У нас была такая же тяжёлая неделя, но с выходных отпустило — кабинеты снова спендят нормально, жизнь возвращается. По лимитам хорошие новости💸: готовы выдавать любое количество по низкому проценту…
❤5❤🔥4🤝4
Meta🔍 тихо подняла цену рекламы — с 1 июля — Австрия🇦🇹, Турция🇹🇷 — +5% к сумме показов — Франция🇫🇷, Италия🇮🇹, Испания🇪🇸 — +3% — Великобритания🇬🇧 — +2% Привязка идёт к гео показа рекламы, а не к стране, где зарегистрирован кабинет. НДС начисляется уже с учётом этой надбавки. 💡Проблема не в самой комиссии, а в том, где её видно. В Ads Manager метрики не меняются — CPA и ROAS в кабинете выглядят так же, как месяц наз…
❤5🙏5🔥3
Сколько в среднем живёт твой рабочий крео?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что сейчас быстрее всего выжигает креативы Хороший крео раньше жил месяцами. Сейчас — 5–7 дней. 🕐Почему? ➡️Entity ID: Meta🔍 анализирует текст, визуал, структуру объявления и присваивает идентификатор. Запустил 5 похожих крео — система видит их как один. Показывает «лучший», остальные игнорирует. Тот один быстро выжигает аудиторию. Нужны реально разные форматы и нарративы. ➡️Высокая частота на узкой аудитории: Узка…
❤🔥4🤝3🙏2👀1
Что делать, если аккаунт жив, но открута почти нет🔗 Кабинет не забанен, баланс есть, кампании запущены — а спенд едва капает 🔵Причина 1. Алгоритм не получает сигналов ARM нужно минимум 50 конверсий в неделю на адсет. Если бюджет раздроблен — каждый адсет зависает в обучении. Решение: консолидировать кампанию, меньше адсетов, больше бюджет на каждый. 🔵Причина 2. Слабый или отсутствующий CAPI Без Conversions API пикс…
❤4🔥3🤝3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mt_agency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вы обычно делаете, если объявление получило статус "learning limited"?
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какую performance goal вы чаще выбираете на адсете?
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как вы обычно тестируете крео после Andromeda?
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сколько в среднем живёт твой рабочий крео?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Когда открут падает — что проверяешь первым?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MT Agency” (@mt_agency), 609 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mt_agency.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.