Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 43 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,945–11,038 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 07:00
10,956
-2
16 Sept 2026, 18:55
10,958
-8
14 Sept 2026, 19:17
10,966
-4
13 Sept 2026, 07:22
10,970
-4
11 Sept 2026, 08:01
10,974
-11
8 Sept 2026, 15:58
10,985
-3
5 Sept 2026, 09:36
10,988
-1
3 Sept 2026, 10:03
10,989
-2
2 Sept 2026, 04:55
10,991
+1
31 Aug 2026, 04:05
10,990
+1
30 Aug 2026, 02:11
10,989
-1
29 Aug 2026, 04:06
10,990
-8
28 Aug 2026, 03:03
10,998
-1
27 Aug 2026, 03:16
10,999
+2
26 Aug 2026, 04:24
10,997
-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:24
10,998
-3
23 Aug 2026, 20:36
11,001
+1
22 Aug 2026, 06:15
11,000
-2
19 Aug 2026, 21:03
11,002
-3
18 Aug 2026, 20:34
11,005
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.34%
avg views ÷ 10,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
914
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
25 (4 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
3,657
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 02:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30m 19s
Average length
6m 04s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,125 reactions across 25 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
542
48.2%
❤
283
25.2%
🎉
69
6.13%
❤🔥
63
5.60%
👍
36
3.20%
👀
33
2.93%
🍾
29
2.58%
🙏
19
1.69%
👏
11
0.978%
👌
9
0.8%
🤔
9
0.8%
⚡
5
0.444%
😁
4
0.356%
🤬
4
0.356%
💯
3
0.267%
😍
2
0.178%
🤩
2
0.178%
🗿
1
0.089%
🥰
1
0.089%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А ваша школьная стратегия сработала во взрослой жизни? 😁
Сегодня хочется вспомнить как мы получали оценки в школе, потому что даже две одинаковые четвёрки могли означать совершенно разное.
Кто-то был настоящим отличником-перфекционистом. 5️⃣ должна быть обязательно👩🏽⚖️
Кто-то учился на твердые четвёрки. В том, что нравилось, разбирался хорошо, а на тройку по нелюбимому предмету смотрел философски - ну не моё это,…
Фича №4. Анимированный переход между листами в дашборде
Предыдущие приёмы:
🧑💻 Фича №1 - всплывающее меню
🧑💻 Фича №2 - навигация между страницами
🧑💻 Фича №3 - Drill Down в дашборде
А сегодня покажу приём, который добавляет дашборду немного магии ✨
Представьте: пользователь нажимает кнопку «Что требует внимания?».....
Экран затемняется, появляется карточка, начинают двигаться точки, меняются статусы: «Сканируем п…
Мы анализируем то, что есть в данных, а иногда самый важный вопрос - чего в наших данных НЕТ?
Внутренние данные раскрывают информацию о том, что покупатель сделал у нас. Сколько раз пришёл, сколько потратил, что купил, как изменился средний чек. Но ничего не говорят о том, что этот же покупатель делает за пределами нашего магазина/салона/и тд
И вот тут выводы могут сильно поменяться. Например, покупатель приходил 3…
Что опять происходит с рынком труда. Посмотрела свежий обзор рынка труда hh.ru за июль 2026 года.
Сейчас hh.индекс составляет 8,7. То есть на одну вакансию приходится в среднем почти 9 активных резюме. По данным Росстата, безработица в России 2.2%
Так откуда тогда столько резюме?
Люди работают. Но всё активнее смотрят по сторонам. Кто-то хочет больше денег, кто-то упёрся в потолок внутри компании, кто-то хочет сме…
Ритейлеру нужно придумать всё больше способов, чтобы каждый наш визит стоил дороже
Посмотрела свежие данные по FMCG за 2026 год. По данным INFOLine, в I квартале продажи продовольственного ритейла в деньгах выросли на 8,1% год к году.
При этом средний чек в январе-мае вырос на 6%, а в части традиционного офлайна трафик уже снижается на 10%.
То есть рост в рублях есть, но за ним не обязательно стоит рост потреблени…
⚠️ ВАЖНО: будьте внимательны, появились мошенники
Сегодня в комментариях к каналу произошла неприятная ситуация.
Подписчица задала вопрос по оплате, после чего ей написал в личные сообщения неизвестный аккаунт под видом нашего «отдела заботы». Уточнили страну оплаты, сумму и сразу прислали ссылку для оплаты.
🙏🏻 К счастью, подписчица решила перепроверить информацию и попросила этот аккаунт подтвердить в канале, что…
Лето заканчивается, а значит, пора готовиться к осени 🙂
Возвращаются рабочие проекты, оживает рынок труда, появляются новые вакансии, собеседования и возможности для роста.
И у меня по этому поводу большая новость 📣
Мы открываем «Летний абонемент» и впервые собрали в одном доступе программы, которые закрывают практически весь путь работы с данными:
✔️ Excel и уверенная работа с таблицами
✔️ Power Excel и автомати…
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @mtrushkoskills. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЭКСЕЛЬХАК @excelhackru · 73,606 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Секреты PowerPoint @PPTSECRETS · 24,353 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mtrushko” (@mtrushkoskills), 10,956 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mtrushkoskills.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.