Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mudrevskiy / заметки

Channel

mudrevskiy / заметки

@mudrevskiy_notes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,300subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001539040683
TypeChannel
Username@mudrevskiy_notes
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mudrevskiy_notes

Growth

2,3002,3152,307.56 August 2026 — 2,315 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,315 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,314 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,311 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,313 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,308 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,303 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,304 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,301 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,300 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 33 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,298–2,317 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 14:392,300-1
31 Aug 2026, 02:032,301-3
27 Aug 2026, 19:042,304+1
25 Aug 2026, 02:422,303-5
21 Aug 2026, 07:032,308-5
18 Aug 2026, 02:222,313+2
11 Aug 2026, 03:012,311-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:022,314-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:302,315no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:182,315first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

438 reactions across 13 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15334.9%
🤡6214.2%
👍5512.6%
❤‍🔥347.76%
🔥276.16%
💩255.71%
😁225.02%
🤮173.88%
👎143.20%
🤯71.60%
😭40.913%
🤣40.913%
🌭30.685%
🍓30.685%
🤝30.685%
👀20.457%
🏆10.228%
🐳10.228%
💯10.228%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
150
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 16 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
45
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mudrevskiy_notes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 November 2025 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC683 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/appletv/status/2081379915602001999 Выглядит стремно, если честно

26 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC899 views25 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😍 помню у кента мама забрала и спрятала планшет, у меня тогда еще его не было, либо же он вечно был в ремонте (не помню), в моем гетто никто не делал норм ремонт, одни мошенники в итоге я долго не думая, пришел к мысли что вряд ли она забирает его на работу, скорее всего он где то дома) также есть предположение, что на планшете не выключен вай-фай, мысли, смекалочка? то ли там еще не было вк, да и звонить, наверно

22😁3

19 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,340 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

надо взрослеть, молодость прощает, если исправляешься вовремя, в этот раз выбор сделан, ошибки оценены, исправляюсь. в этот раз это слова и подпись на бумажке, отдам нужному человеку, записал подтверждение некое, но гарантии нет что я не могу наебать, остается лишь просто верить, других вариантов нет. шанс есть, надо верить, других вариантов как бы нету. спасибо что поучаствовали 🤘

5🤮4🤡3💩2😭1

18 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,270 views15 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как вы считаете, я знаю куда я иду? Другими словами смогу ли я пройти 100к за день? Мне сказали что это нереально 😁

🤯74🔥3🏆1

6 Jun 2026, 22:24 UTC≈2,060 views41 reactions17 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

24👎8💩5🤣4

14 Apr 2026, 09:48 UTC≈2,380 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мероприятие только начинается, будьте готовы одеться в сьют

🔥2

14 Apr 2026, 09:48 UTC≈2,410 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoattack24

🇩🇪 Deutsche Börse инвестировали $200 000 000 в криптобиржу Kraken.

🔥5🤡2

27 Mar 2026, 07:22 UTC≈2,880 views21 reactions25 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Увы, не взял второй айфон, чтобы лучше передать картинку как я еду на велике, слушаю микстейп тейпа, словно в лондоне, в тумане, из-за болотной местности

🔥11🤡4😭3👀2❤‍🔥1

16 Mar 2026, 04:45 UTC≈2,700 views61 reactions45 Starsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍24🤡19💩6🔥6🤮6

7 Jan 2026, 12:34 UTC≈3,550 views55 reactions21 Starsread 7 August 2026

с нового года начал вести дневник, основной тейк этого действия более ясно понять себя, свои желания, идеи и мысли, понять кто ты есть на самом деле. к слову, такие деятели, как: марк твен, да винчи, энштейн, черчиль, бенжамин франклин, дарвин и многие другие делали тоже самое, как раз таки это меня и подтолкнуло на мысль снова начать писать. я уже делал это в 13-15 лет, начинал базово со сценариев для тупеньких видо

❤‍🔥33👍9🤮7💩6

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mudrevskiy_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Коля флипает
@sol_TOP · 40,001
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
ТЕМКА В СХЕМКЕ
@TVS_TEAM · 38,082
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
Павел Сычёв | $ TradeParty $
@tradeparty1337 · 56,639
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
криптапиражок
@cryppi · 30,602
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
DEFI Scam Check
@Defiscamcheck · 48,710
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Steamify - Фарми скины CS2
@steamify · 41,242
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mudrevskiy / заметки” (@mudrevskiy_notes), 2,300 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mudrevskiy_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.