Channel
@muhammadjamessutton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,242subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001765880677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @muhammadjamessutton |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/muhammadjamessutton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:02 | 2,242 | +13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 2,229 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 2,222 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 2,224 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 2,223 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 2,226 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 2,232 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 2,231 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 2,226 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 2,226 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
159 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 64 | 40.3% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 24.5% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 9.43% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 7.55% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.89% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
You can tell a lot about a people by looking at their women and what they allow them to get away with. If you see any people whose women are out of control and doing what they want, you should know the men behind those women are weak, emotional and should never be trusted. We do not deal with weak men who cannot control their women, and we do not deal with emotional men who have an attitude like their women. Alham…
💯23✍1
This is my coffee stained copy that has been with me for close to a decade.
⚡9
Photo, posted without a caption
🆒1
You can find the first book online if you type the name of the book and just type PDF behind it. It is available in that format, but it is not no longer in print from what I can tell.
👍4✍1
If you read both books, you will definitely see the influence, but they are two completely different books.
👍4🆒1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2🔥1
This book was the inspiration for me to eventually write my book, which is the following:
👍2
I read this book so many times overseas it is not even funny. I could not find the book in the bookstores, so I went to a print shop in Sanaa and just had them print it out for me. When I went to Saudi Arabia, I did the same thing. A close brother of mine, Razheen, actually had the book. I borrowed it from him just to read the real book, and ended up spilling coffee on it and my family wrote in the book thinking …
👍4👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
One of the best books that I have read on the subject of memorizing the Quran is the following book:
✍1
These deviants always make the messes and the People of the Sunnah always have to fix what they destroy.
💯12🔥1🤝1
The suit and tie hypocrites who run those cultural centers spend their time trying to brown nose politicians and other kuffaar while their youth are online watching videos of Da'ish.
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @muhammadjamessutton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muhammad James Sutton” (@muhammadjamessutton), 2,242 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muhammadjamessutton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.