Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @arkhangelsxq. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
52 measurements spanning 82 days, net +27,926. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,339–76,219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Oct 2026, 16:20
67,319
-99
26 Oct 2026, 17:08
67,418
-130
25 Oct 2026, 17:38
67,548
-83
24 Oct 2026, 19:46
67,631
-131
23 Oct 2026, 20:56
67,762
-70
23 Oct 2026, 00:11
67,832
-439
21 Oct 2026, 20:01
68,271
+43,982
20 Oct 2026, 13:38
24,289
-61
19 Oct 2026, 16:15
24,350
-59
18 Oct 2026, 14:40
24,409
-36
17 Oct 2026, 14:50
24,445
-28
16 Oct 2026, 14:16
24,473
-84
15 Oct 2026, 13:05
24,557
-112
14 Oct 2026, 13:36
24,669
-90
12 Oct 2026, 22:59
24,759
-9,837
8 Oct 2026, 14:20
34,596
-2,888
4 Oct 2026, 06:20
37,484
-4,636
25 Sept 2026, 11:54
42,120
+9,083
19 Sept 2026, 01:58
33,037
-217
16 Sept 2026, 18:55
33,254
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 146 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.40%
avg views ÷ 67,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,980
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.338%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held
75 (4 July 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total
104,560
Reactions total
353
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,071 reactions across 67 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
237
22.1%
❤
220
20.5%
🎉
212
19.8%
👏
206
19.2%
👍
193
18.0%
💊
1
0.093%
💩
1
0.093%
🖕
1
0.093%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,071 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
10.7%
8 of 75 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
6,750
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,570
over 59 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 25 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🐟 Рыба в Мурманске: сезон начался
⠀
Рынки наполняются свежей продукцией, спрос растёт.
⠀
▫️ Цены на рыбу
▫️ Где купить дешевле
▫️ Лучшие места
⠀
Все о регионе 👇
https://t.me/murmanskpulse
Пчёлы избивают шмелей и гоняют других насекомых ради нектара
За два года учёные зафиксировали около 300 столкновений между насекомыми, которые конкурируют за цветочный нектар. Чаще всего победителями выходили медоносные пчёлы.
Они выталкивают соперников с цветов и даже устраивают за ними погони.
Новости 24/7
Мёд в России может подорожать из-за массовых нападений медведей на пасеки
Как сообщается, особенно сильно страдают пчеловоды Алтайского края: некоторые хозяйства теряют почти все ульи и устанавливают электрические ограждения.
Эксперты считают, на урожай также повлияли холодная весна и вредители, а сокращение производства может привести к росту цен.
Новости 24/7
"Детский прожиточный минимум необходимо увеличить, сейчас его размер недостаточный для удовлетворения нужд ребёнка", – заявила депутат Госдумы Чемерис
Новости 24/7
В России обнаружили новый вид бабочек, рассказали РИА Новости в Южном федеральном университете.
Ученые нашли насекомое в Адыгее. Это эпиблема книциколана — редкая бабочка, которая принадлежит к семейству листоверток. Для культурных растений она безвредна.
Раньше считалось, что такие бабочки обитают в Западной и Центральной Европе.
Новости 24/7
Республика Алтай, Северная Осетия и Сахалинская область стали самыми "зелеными" регионами России, заявили в Агентстве стратегических инициатив.
Согласно исследованию, именно там самая высокая доля городских земель, выделенных под парки и зеленые зоны.
Новости 24/7
Самая сильная вспышка с конца лета произошла на Солнце.
Ученые ИКИ РАН предупредили, что это случилось довольно близко к центру солнечного диска и может повлиять на Землю. Однако взрывных волн и движений вещества в сторону нашей планеты пока не видно, точные расчеты можно будет сделать позднее.
Новости 24/7
В России начали тестировать спутниковую связь в поездах
Как сообщили в РЖД, испытания проводят уже около месяца – они идут хорошо. Возможность запустить высокоскоростной интернет во всех поездах появится в 2028 году – при наличии всего нужного оборудования.
Это позволит пассажирам оставаться на связи на протяжении всей поездки. Специалисты планируют оснащать поезда спутниковой связью поэтапно – на базе низкоорбитал…
Ученые изобрели убийцу Оземпика — скоро выйдет препарат, который будет не подавлять аппетит, а уничтожать жировые клетки
CBL-514 работает иначе: его вводят непосредственно в жировую ткань, где он запускает процесс разрушения жировых клеток — в одном из исследований за 4 недели участники потеряли до 12% жировой массы
Сейчас CBL-514 проходит дальнейшие клинические испытания, если эффективность и безопасность подтверд…
🔥5🎉3👏3👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @murmansx0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 106 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@murmansx0 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@tyumen_2 named in 23 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 October 2026 · confirmed gone 9 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Domains linked from posts
9 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Телеблог Мурманск Мурманская область Реклама Новости Объявления Североморск Мончегорск Кандалакша Апатиты” (@murmansx0), 67,319 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/murmansx0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
