Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 60800033139300910854custom 54428856103836415993custom 53773190133050487552custom 53777751431268525492custom 54043362216126898421custom 54159899883051599911

Channel
@murquisa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,576subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001592592990 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @murquisa |
| Created | 21 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/murquisa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4,576 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 4,582 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 4,580 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,748 |
| Reactions total | 797 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
797 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377775143126852549 | 409 | 51.3% | |
| custom 5442885610383641599 | 86 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5404336221612689842 | 76 | 9.54% | |
| custom 5377319013305048755 | 69 | 8.66% | |
| custom 6080003313930091085 | 66 | 8.28% | |
| custom 5415989988305159991 | 47 | 5.90% | |
| custom 5404638604490193259 | 41 | 5.14% | |
| custom 5447216844383491485 | 2 | 0.251% | |
| custom 5442748802790365408 | 1 | 0.125% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @murquisa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 60800033139300910854custom 54428856103836415993custom 53773190133050487552custom 53777751431268525492custom 54043362216126898421custom 54159899883051599911
Тебе пришло новое сообщение: в чем секрет дисциплины ? появилось бешеное желание стать лучше, хочу изучить все и сразу. боюсь быть тупой, необразованной, скучной, неинтересной. читала ваш канал, вы писали, что чувствуете себя лучше изучая что-то (англ/спорт/чтение) во мне долго не было этого "щелчка", что сейчас я зла на себя из-за того, что так долго меня устраивало быть "скучной" чтоли… попытка вести личный дневни…
custom 54472168443834914852custom 60800033139300910852custom 53773190133050487551
Тебе пришло новое сообщение: Выбрали бы в нынешних реалиях выбирать работу которая не приносит удовольствие, но хотя бы немного покрывает расходы, если с финансами туго? Я устала себя терроризировать этим вопросом Нет не выбрала б Но что один может не может другой и мое мнение вообще не опора в этом вопросе
custom 53777751431268525493custom 54043362216126898423custom 54046386044901932591custom 54159899883051599911custom 54427488027903654081
https://t.me/anonimqbot?start=jejksu
Тебе пришло новое сообщение: Здравствуйте, а можно ваш инст? Не сижу удалила, только тик ток есть
custom 53777751431268525498
Тебе пришло новое сообщение: Здравствуйте муминат. Вы знаете историю блогерши зевизардлиз? Что можете сказать об этом Знаю, ну что сказать, Всевышний всегда нас испытывает если любит. И уже который раз повторяюсь что люди которым дано лечить души людей, им даны и испытания, без этого не выйдет.
custom 608000331393009108513custom 53777751431268525498
У меня осталось несколько позиций моего бренда, по этому сегодня будет легкая коммисионка здесь по максимально низкой цене по себестоимости если не ниже
custom 540463860449019325920custom 537777514312685254911custom 54159899883051599913
My new Tik Toook
custom 537777514312685254943custom 541598998830515999115custom 540463860449019325911
Тебе пришло новое сообщение: Здравствуйте Муминат За последнюю неделю я взахлеб прочла все сообщения на вашем канале с 2023 по 2026 год Очень понравились ваши рекомендации в фильмах, сериалах, особенно в книгах, в принципе ваше отношение к чтению Ваши мысли и ответы на вопросы подписчиков если не перевернули мой мир, то точно заставили задуматься над своей жизнью, отношением к себе и к окружающим. Такой отрезвляю…
custom 537777514312685254942custom 541598998830515999119custom 54428856103836415994
Худшие люди те которые не дают матери видеть ребенка, через ребенка контролируют унижают пытаются разрушить независимость после развода, ставят в положение где она должна выпрашивать своих же детей. Без нее у вас буквально бы не было этих детей, твари. И все кто к этому причастен худшие и должны порицаться обществом и все кто в этом участвует и видит и никакого оправдания нет им.
custom 537731901330504875556custom 54046386044901932594custom 54428856103836415994
Тебе пришло новое сообщение: Я бы не сказала , что он взял жену которая ему не нравится , я скорее имела в виду что мы такие разные ооочень , это скорее больше вопросы к моей не идеальности с точки зрения Кавказа. Да и на счет стандартов к жениху - просто на фоне многих он реально достойный человек , просто я видимо не дотягивала до его понятий на которые он не смог закрыть глаза . А её он уже любит мне кажется , пр…
custom 537777514312685254941custom 60800033139300910858custom 54046386044901932595
Настоящий мужчина должен стремиться к лучшей версии себя и как семьянин и как отец и как сын и как друг и как верующий и как часть общества и как личность. Точно так же как женщина. Планка к женщинам поднята до небес, а они еще и умудряются ей соответвоать
custom 544288561038364159935custom 537777514312685254923custom 608000331393009108515
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @murquisa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muminat…” (@murquisa), 4,576 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/murquisa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.