Там Самойлова к Собчак на трех-часовое интервью пришла на VK😡
custom 544721684438349148515custom 54428856103836415992

Channel
@murquismur
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,528subscribers
-52 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001592592990 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @murquismur |
| Description | По рекламе: @murquis |
| Created | 21 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| On Telegram | t.me/murquismur |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@murquismur was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 4,528 | -46 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 4,574 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4,576 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 4,582 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 4,580 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (18 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 21,156 |
| Reactions total | 823 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,620 reactions across 36 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377775143126852549 | 743 | 45.9% | |
| custom 5442885610383641599 | 217 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5404336221612689842 | 159 | 9.81% | |
| custom 5377319013305048755 | 140 | 8.64% | |
| custom 6080003313930091085 | 122 | 7.53% | |
| custom 5415989988305159991 | 98 | 6.05% | |
| custom 5404638604490193259 | 89 | 5.49% | |
| custom 5447216844383491485 | 39 | 2.41% | |
| custom 5442748802790365408 | 13 | 0.802% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,620 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @murquismur. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Там Самойлова к Собчак на трех-часовое интервью пришла на VK😡
custom 544721684438349148515custom 54428856103836415992
Романтизируем с Камилой на английском эту осень по максимуму ☕️ Я даже не думала что буду так любить этот сезон 🐈 Вчера вечером уже посмотрела Эдвард руки-ножницы и кайфанула. Снять в 1990 году фильм который легко можно посмотреть в 2026 мог только гениальный Бертон .. я даже завидую эстетике в его голове 👊🖤
custom 537777514312685254927custom 54428856103836415995
идеальность уродлива своей скукотой
custom 540433622161268984232custom 537777514312685254912custom 541598998830515999112custom 54428856103836415999
Ссылки на мои beauti гаджеты с обзора в тик-ток 🧈 LPG массажер для тела дарсенваль массажер скалка массажер шарик Су-Джок EMS миостимулятор для пресса массажер с микро токами второй массажер с микротоками
custom 540433622161268984210custom 53777751431268525493
📜📜нашла список кино 📜📜на эту уютную осень Часть 1. Осень, в которой хочется влюбиться: Когда Гарри встретил Салли Вам письмо 🕯️🕯️Ноттинг Хилл 🕯️🕯️Осень в Нью-Йорке Бойфренд из будущего Дом у озера Часть 2. Witches' Autumn 🕯 Практическая магия Колдовство Иствикские ведьмы Фокус-покус Часть 3. Готическая осень Тима Бёртона: Эдвард Руки-ножницы🦇 Труп невесты Битллджус Сонная Лощина…
custom 544288561038364159926custom 53777751431268525497
Имена всех тех, кто на меня действительно как-то позитивно повлиял, начиная с 14 лет. И если вы хотите измениться за год то советую уходить с головой в труды каждого автора Вероника Степанова Брайан Трейси Радислав Гандапас Вадим Зеланд Невилл Годдарт Юваль Ной Харрари Ирвин Ялом Роберт Грин Артур Шопенгауэр Михаил Литвак Джозеф Мерфи Боб Проктор Я не советую смотреть все подряд, выбирайте выдающиеся умы и слушайте и…
custom 608000331393009108538custom 537777514312685254913custom 54043362216126898426custom 53773190133050487553
Как не люблю читать эти скучнейшие предисловия в книгах, но и ощущать что «пропускаю» что-то раздражает, неужели их нельзя в конец впихнуть 🫴 это меня так довела «бегущая с волками»… там такая интересная первая глава! но это предисловие 🤩🐱..
custom 537731901330504875550custom 608000331393009108517custom 54428856103836415999
File, posted without a caption
custom 53773190133050487552custom 53777751431268525492custom 54159899883051599912
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
custom 54043362216126898423custom 54046386044901932592custom 54428856103836415992
«Кинню» — это форма первого лица от сленгового слова «киннить», которая означает «я глубоко ассоциирую себя с этим персонажем или человеком».
custom 537777514312685254918custom 53773190133050487553
Хуже сериала чем «холод» нужно еще искать, долго и упорно искать.. насколько я лояльна ко всему что смотрю но такую бутафорию надо было постараться создать..
custom 537777514312685254926custom 54428856103836415999
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @murquismur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muminat…” (@murquismur), 4,528 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/murquismur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.