Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Muscle Morphology

Channel

Muscle Morphology

@musclemorph

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,300subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001290760866
TypeChannel
Username@musclemorph
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/musclemorph

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,2623,3003,28111 September 2026 — 3,262 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,262 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,265 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,270 subscribers26 September 2026 — 3,272 subscribers5 October 2026 — 3,269 subscribers11 October 2026 — 3,281 subscribers15 October 2026 — 3,286 subscribers18 October 2026 — 3,289 subscribers21 October 2026 — 3,290 subscribers24 October 2026 — 3,295 subscribers27 October 2026 — 3,300 subscribers29 October 2026 — 3,297 subscribers2 November 2026 — 3,298 subscribers5 November 2026 — 3,300 subscribers11 September 20265 November 2026
15 measurements spanning 55 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,256–3,306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 19:003,300+2
2 Nov 2026, 09:163,298+1
29 Oct 2026, 23:363,297-3
27 Oct 2026, 06:343,300+5
24 Oct 2026, 09:163,295+5
21 Oct 2026, 16:393,290+1
18 Oct 2026, 09:453,289+3
15 Oct 2026, 02:113,286+5
11 Oct 2026, 20:363,281+12
5 Oct 2026, 05:553,269-3
26 Sept 2026, 16:183,272+2
17 Sept 2026, 15:023,270+5
13 Sept 2026, 06:593,265+3
11 Sept 2026, 20:233,262no change
11 Sept 2026, 19:473,262first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

💰 TASHANWIN TRADER 💰
@Sikkim_Diuwin_Win · 262,960
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 15 September 2026
🎙أجمل التلاوات🌴🇵🇸
@Holy_Quran2019 · 27,018
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
#تطبيق_ارتقاء
@e_rtiqa · 21,160
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Muscle Morphology” (@musclemorph), 3,300 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/musclemorph.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.