Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elon Musk

Channel

Elon Musk

@musk_elon

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,781subscribers

-8,201 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001454060251
TypeChannel
Username@musk_elon
Description"Open your eyes, look up to the skies" We are not Elon’s representatives ❗️ This is only his fan page ⚠️ Ads: @Source_Ads, https://telega.io/c/elon_musk
Created18 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/musk_elon

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

42,78150,98246,881.58 September 2026 — 50,982 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50,472 subscribers13 September 2026 — 48,881 subscribers14 September 2026 — 48,234 subscribers16 September 2026 — 48,016 subscribers19 September 2026 — 47,748 subscribers25 September 2026 — 45,693 subscribers4 October 2026 — 45,203 subscribers8 October 2026 — 44,901 subscribers12 October 2026 — 44,765 subscribers14 October 2026 — 44,686 subscribers15 October 2026 — 44,665 subscribers16 October 2026 — 44,620 subscribers17 October 2026 — 44,578 subscribers18 October 2026 — 44,566 subscribers19 October 2026 — 44,507 subscribers20 October 2026 — 44,460 subscribers21 October 2026 — 44,373 subscribers22 October 2026 — 44,246 subscribers23 October 2026 — 44,126 subscribers24 October 2026 — 44,000 subscribers26 October 2026 — 43,900 subscribers26 October 2026 — 43,791 subscribers27 October 2026 — 43,693 subscribers29 October 2026 — 43,576 subscribers30 October 2026 — 43,445 subscribers30 October 2026 — 43,329 subscribers31 October 2026 — 43,187 subscribers1 November 2026 — 43,113 subscribers2 November 2026 — 43,079 subscribers3 November 2026 — 43,043 subscribers4 November 2026 — 42,986 subscribers5 November 2026 — 42,921 subscribers6 November 2026 — 42,882 subscribers7 November 2026 — 42,845 subscribers9 November 2026 — 42,781 subscribers8 September 20269 November 2026
36 measurements spanning 61 days, net -8,201. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,551–52,212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 00:3842,781-64
7 Nov 2026, 15:1742,845-37
6 Nov 2026, 17:4942,882-39
5 Nov 2026, 20:2842,921-65
4 Nov 2026, 21:2742,986-57
3 Nov 2026, 21:2643,043-36
2 Nov 2026, 18:0643,079-34
1 Nov 2026, 21:1843,113-74
31 Oct 2026, 23:5043,187-142
30 Oct 2026, 23:4043,329-116
30 Oct 2026, 01:4843,445-131
29 Oct 2026, 00:1043,576-117
27 Oct 2026, 20:2743,693-98
26 Oct 2026, 22:1643,791-109
26 Oct 2026, 00:5443,900-100
24 Oct 2026, 21:2844,000-126
23 Oct 2026, 18:0844,126-120
22 Oct 2026, 14:5744,246-127
21 Oct 2026, 11:0644,373-87
20 Oct 2026, 12:1144,460first reading

Engagement

229 posts held, back to 6 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.9%
avg views ÷ 42,781 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,900
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.245%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 229 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held229 (6 September 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total1,704,670
Reactions total4,175
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 05:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,500
Videos
≈723
Links
≈606

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
37m 54s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,162 reactions across 229 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6,72873.4%
🔥2,13623.3%
😱1521.66%
👎1461.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 229 of the 229 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 229 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @musk_elon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 229 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 95 posts held from the last 30 days (8.42%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 23:50 UTC≈28,000 views45 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026
Video

Elon Musk just revealed that SpaceX will begin launching StarMind SI computers into orbit in Q3 2027, with major deployment ramps in 2028 and 2029. The first systems are being co-designed with NVIDIA around Vera Rubin NVL72. Space-based supercomputing is becoming a reality

🔥26👍19

7 Nov 2026, 23:18 UTC≈28,100 views37 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026
Video

Elon Musk believes that establishing a research base on the Moon could open the door to major discoveries. He points out that some parts of the Moon are older than parts of Earth, potentially giving us new clues about the universe.

👍34🔥3

7 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈28,200 views62 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

🚨 WOW! Elon Musk FIRES BACK at every Senate and House Democrat planning to target him, saying he will GLADLY cancel any government contract — he doesn't NEED them anyway "SpaceX contracts with the government are BOTH the best product AND the lowest price! Moreover government revenue will be less than 10% of SpaceX revenue this quarter and less then 5% a year from now. Happy to cancel any that the government doesn’t …

👍51🔥11

7 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC≈28,600 views41 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Ron Baron asked Elon Musk how many CEOs live on site in an Airstream and work hands-on with everyone. 🗣MUSK: “Airstreams are actually pretty nice... It’s parked right next to the power plant.” “We built this power plant that’s producing over a gigawatt... in about a year, as opposed to normally about five years.” “There is no upstairs.” He walks the entire site up to five times a day. He’s pulled power cables “t…

🔥24👍17

7 Nov 2026, 10:29 UTC≈28,300 views25 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

NEWS: SpaceX is targeting November 13 for Starship Flight 15. SpaceX's VP of Launch, Kiko Dontchev, shared the target at the UP.Summit, pointing to Friday, November 13 for the next Starship flight. Source: Kiko Dontchev (SpaceX), via Eric Berger

🔥16👍9

7 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈28,400 views35 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

BREAKING: Tesla will wind down cybertruck production at Gigafactory Texas next year. Elon Musk said the move comes around the middle of next year, freeing up the line for more Cybercab production. 🎙Elon Musk: "Tesla will be winding down production of the Cybertruck at Gigafactory Texas around the middle of next year to make room for increased Cybercab production"

👍27🔥5😱3

7 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC≈28,300 views37 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

NEWS: Don Harrison has stepped down from SpaceX's board after more than a decade. SpaceX said Harrison, a Class B director who joined the board in 2015, resigned effective November 4. The company's SEC filing noted his decision was not due to any disagreement over its operations, policies or practices. SpaceX thanked him for his years of service and his input on strategy and growth, including the buildout of its S…

👍32🔥5

5 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC≈28,600 views40 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

NEWS: X has rebuilt its web app from scratch, and it is far faster. The old web stack dated back to 2006 and was holding back growth. X replaced it entirely, alongside a new Android app and a refreshed iOS app. The payoff is speed. On a slow connection, a profile's first post used to take more than 22 seconds to appear. On the new X web, it loads in 2.7 seconds. The rewrite took about six months and merged three s…

👍27🔥13

5 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC≈29,000 views33 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

NEWS: SpaceX may be behind plans for what would be Arizona's largest AI data center. SpaceX hosted a community meeting on a 747-acre proposal in Cochise County, near the Apache Generating Station. The plan calls for up to nine computing buildings and on-site battery storage. Local officials are reviewing the project under a special use permit, and the developer says it could create thousands of construction jobs. …

👍31🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 21:59 UTC≈29,100 views17 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Poll

Rate FSD system of Tesla cars out of 5❓

  1. 578%
  2. 416%
  3. 33%
  4. 22%
  5. 12%
  6. 00%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍14🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC≈28,800 views36 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

NEWS: Norway's road authority is holding to its cautious approach on approving Tesla's assisted driving. In an official reply, the Norwegian Public Roads Administration said it weighs the consequences of granting an exemption too early more broadly than "what appears in the press and in Tesla's marketing." Tesla continues to seek regulatory approval to expand its driver-assistance features in the country.

👍33🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 19:59 UTC≈28,900 views41 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

NEWS: Canada's federal Starlink contract has grown from $2 million to nearly $29 million, even as Prime Minister Mark Carney pushes to cut the country's reliance on it. Government disclosures show the deal between Shared Services Canada and SpaceX Canada is now worth about $28.9 million, nearly 13 times its original value. It started at $2.26 million in 2023 and has since been extended to 2027, with the government i…

👍32🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 229 posts we hold for @musk_elon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@musk_elon edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 September 2026
Most recent edit
16 September 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Nov 2026, 21:59 UTCAnonymous Poll129 voters

Rate FSD system of Tesla cars out of 5❓

  1. 578%
  2. 416%
  3. 33%
  4. 22%
  5. 12%
  6. 00%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 20:58 UTCAnonymous Poll189 voters

Good move by Elon Musk?

  1. Yes91%
  2. No9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Oct 2026, 17:59 UTCAnonymous Poll184 voters

Do you think failure is irrelevant ?

  1. Yes43%
  2. No57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Oct 2026, 22:11 UTCAnonymous Poll191 voters

Rate X out of 5 👇🏻

  1. 563%
  2. 417%
  3. 37%
  4. 22%
  5. 16%
  6. 04%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Oct 2026, 23:30 UTCAnonymous Poll253 voters

Which one do you prefer?

  1. Tesla Cybertruck31%
  2. Tesla Roadster69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Oct 2026, 23:15 UTCAnonymous Poll254 voters

Do you support this idea ?

  1. Yes91%
  2. No9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Neuralink
@neuralink · 6,367
#1
Elon Musk Tweets
@musk_tweet · 4,960
#2
Elon Musk
@elon_musk · 97,424
#3
Elon Musk Twitter
@elonmusktwitterbot · 3,153
#4
SpaceX Feed
@SpaceXFeed · 4,456
#5
Fastest Elon Musk Tweets, Replies and Reposts
@elonmuskxfeed · 1,021
#6
Elon Musk Twitter
@elon_twitter · 3,484
#7
From Elon Musk
@from_elonmusk · 875
#8
elon musk tweets
@musktweets · 951
#9
USA | United States of America
@united_states · 15,711
#10
Elon Musk Quantum AI | Official
@ElonMuskQuantumAIOfficial · 895
#11
Earn Money
@earn_money · 10,087
#12
OpenAI Chat GPT
@ai_chatgpt · 9,988
#13
Business | Crypto Trading
@Business_CryptoT · 7,703
#14
Tomorrow Technology
@TheTomorrowTechnology · 9,304
#15
Crazy Earth
@ukrab · 4,666
#16
Real ⚡️News | USA, EUROPE, WORLD WAR
@waitfornewses · 6,281
#17
Business Talk!
@business_talkk · 11,928
#18
WIRED
@wired_tg · 5,533
#19
Everything Science
@everything_science · 31,795
#20
Discovery 🌍
@tg_discovery · 18,212
#21
Technology Review
@technology_tg · 8,185
#22
Amazing Facts💡
@amazingfacts4 · 32,544
#23
Chat GPT | AI News
@ChatGPTAI_Tools · 16,505
#24
Pickup lines 🐬
@Pickup_LineTM · 28,644
#25
Outer Space 🚀
@thespace_tg · 10,192
#26
Marketing
@DigitalMarketingandSales · 9,428
#27
Elon, Vitalik, Cz tweets
@Elonvitalikcztweets · 2,750
#28
STARLINK
@starlink · 4,061
#29
Tucker Carlson Fanbase
@TuckerFans · 100,981
#30
New York City
@new_york · 7,764
#31
Daily US News
@daily_news_american · 20,207
#32
GENERAL KNOWLEDGE ™ 💡
@General_KnowledgeTM · 68,661
#33
Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 579,550
#34
Buzz 📚 History
@buzzhistory · 50,229
#35
Jair M. Bolsonaro 1
@jairbolsonarobrasil · 1,030,412
#36
BNB Early Trending
@BNBearlytrending · 1,019
#37
The White House
@whitehouse · 14,501
#38
Earth Curated 🌎
@earthcurated · 27,784
#39
Weird Facts 🧠
@weird_facts_TM · 55,568
#40
LIFE TIPS
@the_life_tips · 113,608
#41
INSPIRATION TIPS™
@InspirationTipsTM · 77,980
#42
Quotes ― motivational quotes 💭
@mqquotes · 98,988
#43
Impression | Money | Life Lesson 💼
@ImpressionMoney · 51,429
#44
Tik Tok
@tok_tik · 15,375
#45
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 346,247
#46
Feelings ― Soul Lines
@Myfeelings_TM · 83,032
#47
Business Lessons™
@Business_Idea4 · 39,242
#48
The place to be📍
@theplacetobe1 · 6,984
#49
Be Like Bro
@updateee · 41,458
#50
UnFiltered Humour
@UnFilteredHumour · 42,293
#51
Business Talk | Trading🚀
@Busines_Talk · 18,035
#52
🎙sᴀʀᴄᴀsᴛɪᴄ ᴍᴇᴍᴇs™
@sarcastticmemes · 45,605
#53
Inspiration Attitude
@rich_motivational_quotes · 70,639
#54
Time Machine
@whichtimes · 17,915
#55
Mysteries of our planet
@Mysteriesofourplanet · 5,406
#56
Xavier replies 😂🤣
@xavierzone · 63,171
#57
Buzz 💬 Quotes
@buzzquotes · 27,062
#58
Psychology Todays
@Psycho_Todays · 44,266
#59
Meme kingdom™
@MemekingdomTM · 45,074
#60
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG · 255,945
#61
Here We Go Club
@herewegoclub · 81,936
#62
BUSINESS TIPS 101
@bussiness101 · 36,987
#63
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano · 59,511
#64
UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
@uefa_champion_leaguee · 146,749
#65
Why?
@why_eng · 18,897
#66
How to make | Design&Decor
@goodtipsnow · 14,860
#67
Sky Sports
@Sky_sports_football_updates · 26
#68
Wholesome Memes ™
@Wholesome_Meme_TM · 49,629
#69
Tips&Tricks👌
@tipsforgood · 20,082
#70
PROFILE PICTURES
@special_pictures_TM · 82,493
#71
B/R Football
@br_football_news · 78,854
#72
Business Tip™
@bussiness_tipss · 9,169
#73
Real Nature
@tgrealnature · 30,647
#74
Arsenal
@arsenal_london · 142,889
#75
Wow!
@wowwvd · 34,959
#76

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Elon Musk
@elon_musk · 97,424
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Active English ™
@actives_english · 28,013
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026
Daily US News
@daily_news_american · 20,207
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 September 2026
Canada 🇨🇦 News & Life
@canada · 26,571
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elon Musk” (@musk_elon), 42,781 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/musk_elon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.