"Open your eyes, look up to the skies"
We are not Elon’s representatives ❗️
This is only his fan page ⚠️
Ads: @Source_Ads, https://telega.io/c/elon_musk
Created
18 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 61 days, net -8,201. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,551–52,212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 00:38
42,781
-64
7 Nov 2026, 15:17
42,845
-37
6 Nov 2026, 17:49
42,882
-39
5 Nov 2026, 20:28
42,921
-65
4 Nov 2026, 21:27
42,986
-57
3 Nov 2026, 21:26
43,043
-36
2 Nov 2026, 18:06
43,079
-34
1 Nov 2026, 21:18
43,113
-74
31 Oct 2026, 23:50
43,187
-142
30 Oct 2026, 23:40
43,329
-116
30 Oct 2026, 01:48
43,445
-131
29 Oct 2026, 00:10
43,576
-117
27 Oct 2026, 20:27
43,693
-98
26 Oct 2026, 22:16
43,791
-109
26 Oct 2026, 00:54
43,900
-100
24 Oct 2026, 21:28
44,000
-126
23 Oct 2026, 18:08
44,126
-120
22 Oct 2026, 14:57
44,246
-127
21 Oct 2026, 11:06
44,373
-87
20 Oct 2026, 12:11
44,460
first reading
Engagement
229 posts held, back to 6 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.9%
avg views ÷ 42,781 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,900
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.245%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 229 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
229 (6 September 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
1,704,670
Reactions total
4,175
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 05:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,500
Videos
≈723
Links
≈606
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
37m 54s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,162 reactions across 229 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
6,728
73.4%
🔥
2,136
23.3%
😱
152
1.66%
👎
146
1.59%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 229 of the 229 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 229 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @musk_elon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 229 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 95 posts held from the last 30 days (8.42%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Elon Musk just revealed that SpaceX will begin launching StarMind SI computers into orbit in Q3 2027, with major deployment ramps in 2028 and 2029. The first systems are being co-designed with NVIDIA around Vera Rubin NVL72. Space-based supercomputing is becoming a reality
Elon Musk believes that establishing a research base on the Moon could open the door to major discoveries.
He points out that some parts of the Moon are older than parts of Earth, potentially giving us new clues about the universe.
🚨 WOW! Elon Musk FIRES BACK at every Senate and House Democrat planning to target him, saying he will GLADLY cancel any government contract — he doesn't NEED them anyway
"SpaceX contracts with the government are BOTH the best product AND the lowest price! Moreover government revenue will be less than 10% of SpaceX revenue this quarter and less then 5% a year from now. Happy to cancel any that the government doesn’t …
Ron Baron asked Elon Musk how many CEOs live on site in an Airstream and work hands-on with everyone.
🗣MUSK:
“Airstreams are actually pretty nice... It’s parked right next to the power plant.”
“We built this power plant that’s producing over a gigawatt... in about a year, as opposed to normally about five years.”
“There is no upstairs.”
He walks the entire site up to five times a day. He’s pulled power cables “t…
NEWS: SpaceX is targeting November 13 for Starship Flight 15.
SpaceX's VP of Launch, Kiko Dontchev, shared the target at the UP.Summit, pointing to Friday, November 13 for the next Starship flight.
Source: Kiko Dontchev (SpaceX), via Eric Berger
BREAKING: Tesla will wind down cybertruck
production at Gigafactory Texas next year.
Elon Musk said the move comes around the middle of next year, freeing up the line for more Cybercab production.
🎙Elon Musk:
"Tesla will be winding down production of the Cybertruck at Gigafactory Texas around the middle of next year to make room for increased Cybercab production"
NEWS: Don Harrison has stepped down from SpaceX's board after more than a decade.
SpaceX said Harrison, a Class B director who joined the board in 2015, resigned effective November 4.
The company's SEC filing noted his decision was not due to any disagreement over its operations, policies or practices.
SpaceX thanked him for his years of service and his input on strategy and growth, including the buildout of its S…
NEWS: X has rebuilt its web app from scratch, and it is far faster.
The old web stack dated back to 2006 and was holding back growth. X replaced it entirely, alongside a new Android app and a refreshed iOS app.
The payoff is speed. On a slow connection, a profile's first post used to take more than 22 seconds to appear. On the new X web, it loads in 2.7 seconds.
The rewrite took about six months and merged three s…
NEWS: SpaceX may be behind plans for what would be Arizona's largest AI data center.
SpaceX hosted a community meeting on a 747-acre proposal in Cochise County, near the Apache Generating Station. The plan calls for up to nine computing buildings and on-site battery storage.
Local officials are reviewing the project under a special use permit, and the developer says it could create thousands of construction jobs.
…
NEWS: Norway's road authority is holding to its cautious approach on approving Tesla's assisted driving.
In an official reply, the Norwegian Public Roads Administration said it weighs the consequences of granting an exemption too early more broadly than "what appears in the press and in Tesla's marketing."
Tesla continues to seek regulatory approval to expand its driver-assistance features in the country.
NEWS: Canada's federal Starlink contract has grown from $2 million to nearly $29 million, even as Prime Minister Mark Carney pushes to cut the country's reliance on it.
Government disclosures show the deal between Shared Services Canada and SpaceX Canada is now worth about $28.9 million, nearly 13 times its original value. It started at $2.26 million in 2023 and has since been extended to 2027, with the government i…
👍32🔥9
Showing the 12 most recent of 229 posts we hold for @musk_elon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@musk_elon edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 September 2026
Most recent edit
16 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Elon Musk @elon_musk · 97,424 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Active English ™ @actives_english · 28,013 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026
Daily US News @daily_news_american · 20,207 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 September 2026
Canada 🇨🇦 News & Life @canada · 26,571 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elon Musk” (@musk_elon), 42,781 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/musk_elon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.