Channel
@musk_elon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
47,748subscribers
-3,234 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001454060251 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @musk_elon |
| Description | "Open your eyes, look up to the skies" We are not Elon’s representatives ❗️ This is only his fan page ⚠️ Ads: @Source_Ads, https://telega.io/c/elon_musk |
| Created | 18 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/musk_elon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 47,748 | -268 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 48,016 | -218 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 48,234 | -647 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 48,881 | -1,591 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 50,472 | -510 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 50,982 | first reading |
91 posts held, back to 6 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 91 (6 September 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,515,770 |
| Reactions total | 3,099 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,099 reactions across 91 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,270 | 73.2% | |
| 🔥 | 749 | 24.2% | |
| 😱 | 48 | 1.55% | |
| 👎 | 32 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,099 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @musk_elon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 91 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
NEWS: SpaceX got access to the Pentagon's classified space tracking data. Breaking Defense reports the US Space Force gave SpaceX unique access to its most detailed classified tracking data. In return, SpaceX shares its Stargaze data with the military. Stargaze pulls from ~30,000 cameras across nearly 10,000 Starlink satellites to spot and avoid collisions in orbit.
🔥15👍9😱1
NEWS: SpaceX moved Ship 41 to the launch pad at Starbase. The ship is being staged ahead of the next Starship flight. Booster 21 moved to the pad days earlier, so both stages are now in place. Elon Musk said this flight will be the first Starship launch to orbit, carrying Starlink V3 satellites for operational use.
👍26🔥2
We first featured Asentum four months ago ahead of its $ASE token launch. This JavaScript-native blockchain opens its Incentivized Testnet and gamified airdrop campaign. Participants can earn XP by running a validator, using dApps, sending transactions, completing quests, referring friends and more - you can do so on any device 💻 🚨 This is not your typical mindless clicking experience🚨 It's completely free to join…
👍12🔥1
#promo
🔥1
NEWS: Starlink looks to be opening its free Mini dish to all home plans. Starlink quietly changed its support page from "Residential Max plan" to any "Residential plan" for the optional Mini kit. Customers on the cheaper Residential 100Mbps plan say they got a "Claim your Starlink Mini" email. The Mini normally costs $199 to $249 to buy. The deal still needs a Roam plan, with a 20% discount on lower tiers and 50%…
👍25🔥2
NEWS: Grok in your Tesla can now do real work for you. With Connectors, Grok can manage your inbox, clean up your calendar and talk through your files, chats and tasks, all hands-free. Grok Bot handles bigger tasks too, like placing your usual coffee order, booking a reservation or scheduling an appointment.
👍22🔥2👎1
NEWS: Grok in your Tesla can now do real work for you. With Connectors, Grok can manage your inbox, clean up your calendar and talk through your files, chats and tasks, all hands-free. Grok Bot handles bigger tasks too, like placing your usual coffee order, booking a reservation or scheduling an appointment. To set it up, open the Grok app, tap the plus icon, add a New Connector and sign in to your service. Grok t…
🔥15👍10
🗞️ NEWS: SpaceXAI team pushed new For You algorithm updates. Here is what this update changes in your feed: - Quote-replies now get the strict spam check. They run through the full reply scorer instead of the short one, so quoting someone in a reply can score harder for spam. - The coordinated spam scan now skips accounts over 80,000 followers, up from 50,000. Below that, the scoring still runs. - Graphic posts …
👍21🔥2
NEWS: SpaceX signed a new Starship deal Exolaunch. To fly research to space and bring it back to Earth. Exolaunch booked its first Starfall mission with SpaceX, targeted for 2029 on Starship. It can carry up to 1,000 kg of payloads. The flight opens space up for: - Pharmaceutical research - Biotech and drug discovery - In-space manufacturing
👍34🔥5👎1
NEWS: X sued a group it says faked engagement to take more than 200,000 pounds from creators. X filed in the High Court in London against Vivek Kumar Sen and Zamyang Sherpa and others behind a network of crypto accounts. The complaint says they liked and reposted each other and posted near copy paste content within seconds to fake real engagement, then cashed out through Creator Revenue Sharing. It says they hid b…
👍35🔥4
BREAKING: Tesla says Czechia has approved FSD Supervised The 7th European country to clear it and rollout starting soon. Czechia follows Slovenia, which became the 6th country two weeks ago. The full list so far: - Netherlands - Lithuania - Estonia - Denmark - Belgium - Slovenia - Czechia An EU-wide vote on FSD is expected in October. Source: Tesla Europe
👍35🔥1
🗣️ Elon Musk explains the idea behind The Boring Company and why tunnels are the only solution to urban congestion: “Tunnels are, in my view, the only solution to urban congestion because we have a 2D road network and we have buildings in 3D, and everyone wants to pile out of those buildings and into those buildings at the same time. Obviously, you’re going to have a traffic jam.”
👍48🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @musk_elon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@musk_elon edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you think constructing data centers is good for the local economy of each city
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you like to use Neuralink chips?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you think AI is getting dangerous?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you like to know more about the boring company?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you trust Tesla's FSD?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elon Musk” (@musk_elon), 47,748 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/musk_elon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.