# Anak Sedang Diare dan Orang Tua Tidak Mau Bawa ke Dokter . Ada seseorang yang berkata kepada saya ketika membicarakan tentang diare. Ia mengatakan jika seorang anak diare, tidak perlu dibawa ke dokter, cukup diberi campuran air minum plus madu maka diarenya bisa sembuh. Ia membuktikan bahwa anaknya sembuh dengan terapi tersebut. Kemudian ia berkata, jika di bawa ke dokter nanti malah di infus seperti anak temanny…
Channel
Muslimafiyah.com
@muslimafiyah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,321subscribers
-528 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001005230055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @muslimafiyah |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/muslimafiyah |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:17 | 17,321 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:37 | 17,333 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:50 | 17,340 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:18 | 17,343 | -12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 17,355 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 17,368 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:11 | 17,372 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 17,384 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 17,394 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 17,399 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 17,400 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:06 | 17,415 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 17,419 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 17,425 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 17,426 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 17,435 | -14 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 17,449 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 17,452 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 17,455 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 17,457 | first reading |
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.93%
- avg views ÷ 17,321 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 507
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 74 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 10,148 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 41s
- Average length
- 41s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
# Menunda Anak Perempuannya Menikah Akan Membuat Anak Perempuannya Tidak Bahagia . Tulisan lengkapnya baca di : https://muslimafiyah.com/memudahkan-mahar-dan-resepsi-sederhana-pernikahan.html ✍️ dr. Raehanul Bahraen, M.Sc., Sp.PK. Follow juga: @muslimafiyahacademy @muslimafiyahacademy @muslimafiyahacademy Jazakumullahu khairan 🌱Jangan lupa share! Semoga setiap orang yang terinspirasi karena ajakan kebaikanmu …
Photo, posted without a caption
# Istri Ngambek & Ngomong Nyakitin? Jangan Buru-buru Marah Balik . Perhatikan juga para suami, Jika ada sesuatu yang tidak beres pada istri dan anak-anak bisa jadi akibat maksiat suami, maka introspeksi diri dan perbanyak istighfar Sebagian ulama berkata, إن عصيت الله رأيت ذلك في خلق زوجتي و أهلي و دابتي “Sungguh, ketika bermaksiat kepada Allah, aku mengetahui dampak buruknya ada pada perilaku istriku, keluargaku da…
Photo, posted without a caption
# Sedang Struggle Dengan Kehidupan? Nikmatilah Setiap Prosesnya, Tak Perlu Terburu-buru Ingin Memetik Hasil Sebelum Waktunya . Sesuatu yang benar-benar bernilai hampir selalu membutuhkan waktu, kesabaran, dan ketekunan. Entah mengapa, manusia memang sangat menyukai sesuatu yang instan. Terlebih pada zaman sekarang, ketika hampir semua kebutuhan dapat diperoleh dengan cepat. Makanan tinggal diseduh, belanja cukup de…
Photo, posted without a caption
✨ Usia Senja, Semakin Sehat & Salih! ✨ Jangan batasi diri untuk terus belajar. Dapatkan 6 sesi eksklusif ilmu agama & kesehatan dari Muslimafiyah Academy hanya dengan Rp99.000! 📲 Daftar: academy.muslimafiyah.com atau klik link di bio: @muslimafiyahacademy @muslimafiyahacademy @muslimafiyahacademy ☎️ Informasi: +6285183134607 (Admin Muslimafiyah Academy)
Video, posted without a caption
# Hukum Asalnya Jin Itu Takut Dengan Manusia . Mungkin waktu kecil kita sering bilang “Permisi mbah numpang lewat”, ketika mau lewat pohon angker. Akidah kita mengajarkan bahwa JIN ITU HUKUM ASALNYA TAKUT DENGAN MANUSIA. Nah karena kita yang merendahkan diri duluan, mereka jadi berani, awalnya pohon itu biasa aja jadinya banyak jin yang tinggal karena di keramatkan bahkan dikasi sesaji. Rasa takut hanya kepada All…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @muslimafiyah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@muslimafiyah named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 65 posts, 8 August 2026 – 5 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tausiyahbimbinganislam · 23,709
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
@muslimorid · 32,473
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
@indonesiabertauhid · 20,362
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
@fiqihwanitaofficial · 30,419
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
@rumaysho · 22,245
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
@thequran_path · 25,310
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
@muhammadnuzuldzikri · 49,484
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
@thesunnah_path · 26,551
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
@official_hsiabdullahroy · 23,432
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 September 2026
@gurujuara · 166,879
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
@khalidbasalamahofficial · 69,499
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@yufidtv · 25,965
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
@najmiumar · 31,266
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
@shahihfiqih · 41,882
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
@kajianislamchannel · 27,304
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
@Manhaj_salaf1 · 33,472
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muslimafiyah.com” (@muslimafiyah), 17,321 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muslimafiyah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.