Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адаптация к будущему

Channel

Адаптация к будущему

@must_adapt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,611subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002991276347
TypeChannel
Username@must_adapt
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/must_adapt

Growth

3,5883,6113,599.56 August 2026 — 3,592 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,592 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,588 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,589 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,597 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,601 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,602 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,600 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,603 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,611 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,585–3,614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 09:153,611+8
1 Sept 2026, 04:043,603+3
29 Aug 2026, 06:163,600-2
23 Aug 2026, 11:383,602+1
19 Aug 2026, 13:253,601+4
16 Aug 2026, 08:373,597+8
12 Aug 2026, 19:533,589+1
10 Aug 2026, 02:113,588-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:343,592no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:493,592first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

416 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9222.1%
🔥8620.7%
👍5513.2%
😁5212.5%
🤣4310.3%
👾225.29%
🦄215.05%
112.64%
❤‍🔥71.68%
🐳71.68%
👎61.44%
🤔51.20%
👨‍💻30.721%
🎉20.481%
👏20.481%
😎20.481%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 416 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC986 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Подборка подкастов с практиками, активно использующими нейронки в своей работе, на моём ютюбе. Если пропустили хоть один выпуск, настоятельно советую посмотреть! 1) свежий выпуск с фаундером и CEO «Зерокодера» Кириллом Пшинником, который делегировал нейросетям исследования, презентации, PR, аналитику и часть рабочих процессов своей компании и рассказывает все детали: https://youtu.be/dTblDdxu_-A?si=n41dyLu0GIMfWO_a

107🔥4👾3

30 Jun 2026, 09:52 UTC≈2,440 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хм...

🤣38😁19🐳7🤔5👨‍💻3

22 Jun 2026, 17:17 UTC≈2,970 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mustchess

Только что мы с командой выложили мой новый подкаст с Вэем И на китайском (!!!) с русскими субтитрами! Обсудили Турнир претендентов и результаты Вэя, выступление Синдарова и других участников, а также дальнейшие планы Вэя в шахматах. Маствотч: https://youtu.be/5J8STYXSWNQ

🔥10👍54

22 Jun 2026, 17:17 UTC≈2,540 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот, собственно, результат — подкаст на китайском вышел (с русскими субтитрами, с которыми нам тоже помогла нейронка, естественно, плюс человек редактировал).

👍4❤‍🔥3🎉2👾2🔥2

8 Jun 2026, 07:24 UTC≈3,320 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Расскажу вам про новый классный use case нейронок в моей практике. Как многие из вас знают, моя основная деятельность в последние годы — шахматный подкастер и ютубер. Я записываю подкасты с топ-гроссмейстерами со всего мира на английском и русском языках. Но есть один такой гроссмейстер по имени Вэй И. Он из Китая, входит в мировой топ-10, участвовал недавно в Турнире Претендентов (самый важный турнир в шахматах, по

👍1510🔥5👾2🦄1

3 Jun 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,780 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Жизненно! :)

😁30🦄3😎2👾1

12 May 2026, 18:18 UTC≈3,640 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня прошла первая встреча моей новой мастермайнд-группы «Адаптация 2.0». Я под впечатлением, было круто и полезно — в том числе, для меня. Гостевой эксперт рассказывал про настройку ИИ-агентов. В итоге решил арендовать свой сервер под это дело (для безопасности, это стоит 10 долларов в месяц) и настроить Hermes (это как OpenClaw, но удобнее). Буду делиться здесь прогрессом! Вот вам классная инфографика от нашего

🔥11🦄5👾3

11 May 2026, 15:37 UTC≈3,100 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В продолжение темы генерации инфографики: один технологический обозреватель провёл эксперимент, дав задачу отрисовать инфографику с устройством Raspberry Pi (это такой мини-компьютер размером с кредитку) ChatGPT, Claude Design и NotebookLM. Спойлер: лучше всего справилась с задачей ChatGPT. Она и красиво, и достоверно всё отобразила. Claude Design (новый продукт от Антропик) текстом всё изложил толково, но отрисовал

16🔥3🦄2😁1

8 May 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,760 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В мою новую мастермайнд-группу по нейронкам "Адаптация 2.0" уже записались такие разные люди, как: — руководитель юридической фирмы — художница и блогер — продакт-менеджер — глава венчурного фонда — операционный директор медиахолдинга — один из топов крупнейшего маркетплейса в СНГ. Я вдохновлён тем, какой контингент у нас собрался и тем, что теперь сам буду каждую неделю на 2 часа созваниваться с этими ребятами. И

🔥10👏21

7 May 2026, 18:11 UTC≈2,600 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На днях в ChatGPT вышел апдейт функции генерации картинок. Последние месяцы безоговорочным лидером в этой сфере был Гугл с его Nano Banana, но теперь OpenAI снова может достойно конкурировать в этой сфере. Оцените: во вложении — две инфографики, сгенерированные по несложному текстовому промпту. Главный скачок был сделан в том, как генерируются надписи на картинках. Раньше с этим у ГПТ была полная беда, теперь стало

🔥164👾43

6 May 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,570 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ролик вышел! Обязательно посмотрите и не пропустите анонс в видео: https://youtu.be/Be8VHVtnO_4

👍5👎531🤣1

6 May 2026, 09:35 UTC≈2,680 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня выйдет новый ролик, вот такие варианты обложек сделали с командой (с нейронкой, естественно). Угадайте тему :)

🔥13👾4🦄4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @must_adapt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адаптация к будущему” (@must_adapt), 3,611 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/must_adapt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.