Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MUZZBAD

Channel

MUZZBAD

@muzzbad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,069subscribers

+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882486746
TypeChannel
Username@muzzbad
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/muzzbad

Growth

7,0287,1167,0727 August 2026 — 7,028 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,029 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,034 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,064 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,072 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,083 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,111 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,110 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,094 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,069 subscribers7,0697 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,015–7,129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 18:417,069-25
2 Sept 2026, 01:167,094-22
29 Aug 2026, 15:537,116+6
26 Aug 2026, 14:497,110-1
23 Aug 2026, 05:177,111+28
19 Aug 2026, 13:077,083+11
16 Aug 2026, 19:087,072+8
13 Aug 2026, 10:357,064+30
10 Aug 2026, 12:217,034+5
7 Aug 2026, 12:257,029+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:167,028first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 7,069 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held50 (15 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total23,941
Reactions total692
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34m 24s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,174 reactions across 50 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,40864.8%
🔥26112.0%
👍25711.8%
🥰592.71%
🗿462.12%
😁442.02%
😎421.93%
😢190.874%
🤯130.598%
👏90.414%
💯80.368%
🫡30.138%
🍾20.092%
😍20.092%
🤬10.046%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 50 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @muzzbad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC98 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Васянство. Васянство никогда не меняется. На пакет гречки для Демосфена.

3👍1

20 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC374 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

В моём моде смерти не будет как таковой. Зачем смотреть на загрузочные экраны? Напарника можно будет поднять до истечения таймера и при наличии аптечки. Если не успел или нет аптечки - напарник возрождается на ближайшем от него смарте. Во время ранения одного из игроков сохранения отключены. Система работает как часы на любой локации. В одиночном режиме смерть как обычно. P.S. текстуры тёмно-синие на пушках потому, ч

👍174

20 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC469 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026

С2 новое длс на стриме наверное будет, но как тока появится в зелёном стиме, посмотрим, что они там наворотили и за что у фанатов жёпы рвутся так сильно

😁113

20 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC625 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Кстати может иконки обновлю тоже все, но заколебусь рендерить каждый предмет, нейронками не хочу делать. Вообще забавно, что до тех пор, пока не покажешь скрин из блендера или фотошопа, люди будут думать что это нейронка, как вот в чате одном было. Обычно я всегда сразу говорю, в каких местах её использую. Точно так же как с видосами, я когда переснимал контент с 2021 года, мне писали что ИИ сценарку пишет, хотя в те

👍155

20 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC611 views33 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

А давайте скины на оружие сделаем? Чтобы прям как в современных играх было, как в сталкер 2 например

25😁8

20 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC639 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Хахаха этот придурок ваще сидит на древнем куске кода чето делает какие-то моды свои а мог бы во второй сталкер играть

22

20 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC747 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю почему, но меня дико забавляет, как рвутся жепы у фанатов второго сталкера. Вот прям уровень развития новых фанатов сталкера. Нрааааица 🙂 Бля, ну дефать откровенно шлаковый (хотя местами и годный) проект только потому, что его сделали в стране, где ты живёшь - это как если бы я до красной жопы нахваливал смуту и колобка. Вообще, попытки задефать эту игру вперемешку с осками, когда кто-то выдаёт мнение, отлич

🥰29👍42👏2

19 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC975 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Чучут над звуком оружия в разных условиях и над освещением поработал, а ещё сделал более живые диалоги, вот знаешь когда какой-нибудь тип приходит в новую компанию и рассказывает анекдот а какой-нибудь мудак критикует, ну он ему и отвечает типа. Потом реплики переделаю, они тупо для теста записаны. На всякий случай повторю: мод НИКАК НЕ СВЯЗАН C ANOMALY, ОН РАЗРАБАТЫВАЕТСЯ СОВЕРШЕННО НА ДРУГОЙ ПЛАТФОРМЕ И ОТДЕЛЬНОМ

23

19 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC977 views39 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Заколебали эти сервисы для скачивания видео постоянно рекламу ТАНКОВ или СРАЛЗОНА всучивать и расширения ещё какие-то качать и хрен че скачается а если и скачается то без звука. Сделал себе блин свой суверенный загрузчик музыки и видео. Скоро все сервисы будут моими. Скока можно, скока можно. Были бы они людьми Обэмэ.

37👏2

18 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,170 views56 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Уай биля, я заболел. Даж разговаривать горлу больно жесть. Стрим только завтра, если получше станет. Сегодня зато над модом помучаюсь да видосы домонтирую все.

👍458🫡3

18 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,250 views60 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Рыла свинья, тупорыла, белорыла, Полдвора рылом изрыла, Вырыла, подрыла, до норы не дорыла. На то хавронье и рыло, чтобы она рыла.

57👍3

17 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,350 views37 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Video

Допилил оружейку и обвесы. Только вот думаю, делать ли 3д прицелы или закрытые по дефолту оставить. Знаю, что 3д прицелы не особо любят. Ну посмотрим, надо сравнить и решить. Может и получится что-то годное реализовать. Как же я заебался уже. Поддержать и ускорить разработку мода можно тут.

36👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @muzzbad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@muzzbad edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MUZZBAD” (@muzzbad), 7,069 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muzzbad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.