Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عالم الانمي ❄ مميز انمي

Channel

عالم الانمي ❄ مميز انمي

@mw_en

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

14,759subscribers

-271 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003814885173
TypeChannel
Username@mw_en
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mw_en

Growth

14,64315,03814,840.517 August 2026 — 15,030 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,020 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,947 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,884 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,038 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,907 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,822 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,962 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,879 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,814 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,750 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,704 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,643 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,741 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,872 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,833 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,927 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,759 subscribers14,75917 August 20266 September 2026
18 measurements spanning 20 days, net -271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,584–15,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 11:3714,759-168
4 Sept 2026, 06:2114,927+94
2 Sept 2026, 18:2914,833-39
1 Sept 2026, 15:3714,872+131
31 Aug 2026, 13:5414,741+98
30 Aug 2026, 12:1314,643-61
29 Aug 2026, 10:4214,704-46
28 Aug 2026, 10:3414,750-64
27 Aug 2026, 10:0214,814-65
26 Aug 2026, 10:2314,879-83
25 Aug 2026, 08:4514,962+140
24 Aug 2026, 11:3914,822-85
22 Aug 2026, 16:1314,907-131
21 Aug 2026, 05:4215,038+154
20 Aug 2026, 06:3614,884-63
19 Aug 2026, 09:0614,947-73
18 Aug 2026, 09:3815,020-10
17 Aug 2026, 23:1515,030first reading

Engagement

162 posts held, back to 15 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.90%
avg views ÷ 14,759 subscribers
Avg views / post
280
160 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
162
of 162 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 149 of 160 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held162 (15 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total44,828
Reactions total1,452
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,452 reactions across 149 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
45131.1%
❤‍🔥44630.7%
🤣34023.4%
💘523.58%
😭382.62%
🍓342.34%
💔201.38%
👍151.03%
🔥120.826%
😁90.62%
🌚80.551%
😍80.551%
😡70.482%
💯30.207%
🫡30.207%
🏆20.138%
🤓20.138%
👌10.069%
🤪10.069%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,452 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 160 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mw_en. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 162 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:25 UTC74 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اربع فرق اكتمل حتى الان ✔️ 1- قاهروا الاكاتسي 2- العناكب 3 الفجر الذهبي 4-لم يختارو الاسم بعد ⚠️عليكم بسرعه التسجيل الوقت ينفذ🔥🔥🔥

🍓1

Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙘𝙖

2 Sept 2026, 21:24 UTC210 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔥🎴 حرب بطاقات الأنمي بدأت! 🎴🔥 هل أنت مستعد لأقوى مواجهة 3 ضد 3؟ ⚔️ 🎯 اختر أرقامك بعناية، اكشف بطاقات الخصم، وحاول جمع أكبر عدد من النقاط. 📋 تفاصيل البطولة: 👥 عدد الفرق: 8 فرق فقط (الأولوية للتسجيل المبكر) 👤 كل فريق: 3 أعضاء بالضبط 📆تاريخ البطولة: تبدأ عندما تكتمل 8 فرق - الساعة 9 مساء بتوقيت اليمن 🇾🇪 ⚠️📣 تنبيه: أول 8 فرق يكملون التسجيل هم اللي يشاركون. ⚠️ شرط مهم جداً: اسم الفريق لازم يكون من عالم الأنمي فقط! ممن

❤‍🔥3

Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙘𝙖

2 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC141 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

❤️‍🔥الفائزون بالمسابقة: المركز الأول 25 نجمة @J6_2A (122) صوت🎁 المركز الثاني 15 نجمة @aw2123e (113) صوت🎁

5

Signed 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻❦

2 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC179 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

قد تتنافس الأفلام الثلاثة ضد بعضها البعض في شباك التذاكر لعام 2027 اي فيلم متحمس له ؟ 😈💥🔥

15

Signed 𝙏𝙊𝙅𝙄 Ꮓ℮ηᎥη

2 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC203 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥8

Signed 𝙏𝙊𝙅𝙄 Ꮓ℮ηᎥη

2 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC224 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اليوم يتم اعلان نتائج المسابقة على الساعة 12 باليل

15❤‍🔥2

Signed 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻❦

2 Sept 2026, 07:57 UTC270 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

فخامة الرد تكفي لخطف قلبي 🙂❤️ Inumaki-senpai 😭😭 فخامة

❤‍🔥195💘4🤣4😭3🔥1😁1

Signed 𝙎𝙃𝙊𝙆𝘼

1 Sept 2026, 13:33 UTC317 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

اكثر شي يستفز اي قارئ مانهوا 🙂🌚😂

🤣29👍4💯2

Signed 𝙎𝙃𝙊𝙆𝘼

1 Sept 2026, 01:58 UTC323 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026

متى تخلص المسابقه افجركم منشورات 😡

🤣27🍓3

Signed 𝙎𝙃𝙊𝙆𝘼 شوكه

31 Aug 2026, 00:44 UTC476 views18 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

المشارك رقم 0: شادو

14🤣4

Signed 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻❦

30 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC449 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026

تم تنزيل جميع الصور بعد ثلاث أيام ينتهي التصويت🌷 أكثر شخص يحصل على أكبر عدد من التصويت يفوز 🎁 بالتوفيق للجميع🌟

12

Signed 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻❦

30 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC474 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

المشارك رقم 22 والأخير: @ASEEL84

8

Signed 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻❦

Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @mw_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@mw_en edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 23 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTCFinal Results186 voters

من الأجدر باللقب؟؟🏆

  1. هنتر اكس هنتر 👏56%
  2. اتاك اون تايتن 😒49%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTCFinal Results50 voters

من الأفضل؟

  1. ناروتو46%
  2. هنتر اكس هنتر64%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTCFinal Results45 voters

من الأفضل؟؟

  1. هجوم العمالقة71%
  2. المحقق كونان36%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTCFinal Results68 voters

من الأفصل؟؟

  1. ناروتو59%
  2. ديث نوت43%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTCFinal Results73 voters

من الأفضل؟؟

  1. هنتر اكس هنتر84%
  2. سباي اكس فاميلي21%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTCFinal Results39 voters

من الأفضل؟؟

  1. المحقق كونان54%
  2. بوكونوهيرو51%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عالم الانمي ❄ مميز انمي” (@mw_en), 14,759 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mw_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.