Channel
@my_opin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003485341194 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @my_opin |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/my_opin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 33 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 35 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 36 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 37 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 39 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 39 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☃ | 12 | 31.6% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5206490107900607256 | 7 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5204427097669387414 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| custom 6323209852860502573 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| custom 6325452156501495796 | 2 | 5.26% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @my_opin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
КАПУЧИНО “Эмоциональный гармонизатор” Главные черты: мягкость, эмпатия, забота, умение создавать уют. Архетип: хранитель, миротворец, душевный центр компании. Психологический портрет: Ты мастер эмоциональных настроений. Умеешь считывать малейшие колебания в атмосфере и тонко их корректировать. С тобой тепло, безопасно, спокойно. Ты — человек, у которого “уют внутри”. Мотивация: Гармония, эмоциональная близость, довер…
☃4🕊2
Немного рж в канал
Работа личного недофотографа друзей 🫡
☃3
Кто знает или знает, я люблю смотреть про подобную чернуху. К каждой статье буду прикреплять сс на одного ютубера-тру краймера, дипломированного психиатра. Если заинтересует какая-то личность, можете глянуть
🕊2
Андрей Чикатило Сложный клубок из тяжелого детства, деформированной психики и чудовищных преступлений. Он вышел из голодного детства, где научился притворяться мертвым, — и носил эту маску всю жизнь. Учитель, муж, отец, серый и незаметный, он был воронкой, засасывающей беззащитных: детей на лесных тропах, женщин у пустых остановок. Его нож вонзался десятки раз не от ярости, а от бессильной злобы к собственному отраже…
☃3
Вообще, кто тут остался, пишите, что у вас нового, что было в тгк других виртух интересного?
Хотите что-то от меня или нет? Если нет, то я просто также оставлю его, как было; если да, то скорее всего будут какие-нибудь вкиды, мои мысли и тд, может когда-нибудь инты проведу, но оставайтесь только те, кому рил интересна моя персона. Мью, вз и подобную дичь я не буду оформлять с людьми
☃1🕊1
Я удивлен, что тут есть еще 41 человек
Интересно, есть смысл что-то продолжать?🧐
☃1
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 💮Канон, возникший между гонщиками-конкурентами за чемпионство и вместе-просто сладкими булочками? Даа, мой любимый свод- ландоскары. Пилоты из одной команды: Ландо Норрис и Оскар Пиастри, активно взаимодействуют друг с другом, тем самым трогают души фанатов формулы 1. 🤍 Команды: Ландо Норрис- McLaren Оскар Пиастри- McLaren
Момент Что где то там в степи далекой, Меня ждет спутник мой влюблённый, Питает чувства и лелеет Надежды светлые о нас. А я сейчас жду непременно Тот самый миг, тот самый час, Когда о нас начнутся рифмы Той самой чувственной любви
custom 52064901079006072564custom 63232098528605025733custom 63254521565014957962
Самое главное- это чувствовать и жить в соответствии со своими идеалами, если только эти идеалы не ограничиваются собственным идеальным комфортом Джон Фаулз «Коллекционер»
🕊4custom 52044270976693874144custom 52064901079006072563custom 63232098528605025731
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @my_opin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Show me love” (@my_opin), 33 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/my_opin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.