Channel
@mycreativewriting
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001795278226 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mycreativewriting |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mycreativewriting |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 160 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 159 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 161 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 160 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 157 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 157 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
85 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 37.6% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 16.5% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 16.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 12.9% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 4.71% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.53% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Well, Carmen in Salzburg is an experiment for sure. I can understand why I've already read so many dissatisfied reviews. Opening the opera with a scene where a soldier hands a gun to a child, who then shoots at other children, that's bold. But I love provocations like that, and Gabriela Carrizo pulled it off brilliantly. I admired how much physicality and psychological depth this production has. I can't say I loved…
❤3
Don’t miss today’s live from Salzburg (w/ Teo) https://www.arte.tv/de/videos/132674-001-A/georges-bizet-carmen/
❤🔥2🐳2
People love saying you need "a problem you actually want to solve" to start using AI. Sure. Except there are approximately 500 problems and processes you could throw AI at, and somehow you don't do that for 499 of them. The real unlock isn't "having a problem". It's having a problem that makes you want to throw your laptop across the room! Today I learned that my motivation scales directly with RAGE, not with utilit…
🔥6❤🔥3
What could be better for a weekend than a movie about an Irish female gopnik, let’s say it this way) Especially if she’s played by Eve Hewson, who you probably know from Bad Sisters. Overall, this is one of the warmest Irish movies I’ve ever watched 😁 That’s kinda a big deal
🔥3❤1🥰1
Had a case this week that followed the pattern of Single Point of Attachment This is what happens when someone builds their professional identity and sense of safety around a relationship with one specific leader, instead of around their role, the team, or the work itself. The job quietly stops being a contract of "contribution for recognition" and becomes an emotional exchange of "loyalty for reassurance." On pape…
🔥3❤2
After two pages of this book, I have a feeling it wasn’t the perfect choice to read right after Patchett. But here we are 🤓
❤5
Repose, Pierre-Emmanuel Lyet 💛
❤6
Sometimes all you need in the evening is some Moomin gummies and the talking sheep from The Sheep Detective! Wanted to watch it ever since the Tube was covered in ads for it back in the spring 😁
❤7🔥2🥰2
Live your life in such a way that you get ripped into by the CFO at the start of the meeting, but by the end of it, she's asking for a pic of your abs 😁
😁4❤2🤩2
track of the day aware of that resistance edge which made this song so popular, but anyway, I like it https://youtu.be/EdFlJFXPNZU
❤2💔2
Let's begin with the fact that, in general, I don't like European movies most of the time. E.g., Sentimental Value left me indifferent. So, when I decided to watch an Italian movie with Josh O'Connor (yep, he was the reason), I was a little bit sceptical. From the first minutes, I knew I was wrong. La Chimera introduced me to Alice Rohrwacher, the most incredible director who stole my heart. O'Connor was nice as usu…
❤🔥6💔2🦄1
how I feel travelling around Europe every summer with no AC anywhere 😁 Marcellus Hall’s “Spa Day”
😁10🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mycreativewriting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“clockwork literary coterie” (@mycreativewriting), 160 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mycreativewriting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.