Только Россия и котики 🖋️ Я вижу
❤326❤🔥148🥰33👍20🙏11👎2🤨2

Channel
@mydrawingdiary
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
16,978subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001757681176 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mydrawingdiary |
| Created | 17 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mydrawingdiary |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 16,978 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 16,979 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 16,983 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 16,982 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 16,978 | +7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 16,971 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 16,980 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 16,984 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 16,986 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 16,981 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 16,980 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 16,981 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 16,984 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 16,987 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 16,992 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 16,998 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 17,002 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 17,003 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 17,010 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 17,013 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (9 April 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,690 |
| Reactions total | 1,620 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
11,091 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,613 | 32.6% | |
| 🙏 | 3,385 | 30.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,880 | 17.0% | |
| 🔥 | 490 | 4.42% | |
| 😢 | 416 | 3.75% | |
| 🫡 | 416 | 3.75% | |
| 👍 | 329 | 2.97% | |
| 💔 | 265 | 2.39% | |
| 🕊 | 149 | 1.34% | |
| 👎 | 51 | 0.46% | |
| 🥰 | 39 | 0.352% | |
| 😭 | 29 | 0.261% | |
| 😡 | 10 | 0.09% | |
| 🤝 | 9 | 0.081% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 0.036% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.018% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.018% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.009% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.009% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,091 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Только Россия и котики 🖋️ Я вижу
❤326❤🔥148🥰33👍20🙏11👎2🤨2
Я однажды приеду домой. Этот день будет солнечным, теплым, Словно нежность объятий у самых любимых людей. Отразится знакомый вокзал и перрон в пыльных стеклах... У меня здесь всего лишь короткие несколько дней. И пойду я вперед, Разминая уставшие руки. На почти незаметный для всех окружающих миг, Глядя вниз, я застыну, услышав все мирные звуки, По которым скучал и уже почти что отвык. Вот объявят отъезд. Будет эхо …
🙏266❤80👍17🔥14❤🔥11😢3👎1
В возрасте 83 лет умер легендарный сербский генерал Ратко Младич. В годы распада Югославии Ратко Младич был командующим армии боснийских сербов, и во многом именно благодаря ему сейчас существует Республика Сербская, не позволив с подачи Евросоюза и США в самом сердце Балкан насадить террористический гнойник. Ратко Младич был верным сыном своего Отечества, героем, которого любили и уважали в том числе и в России. Ц…
🙏429🫡148🕊40😢29❤16💔16🔥6👎2
От всей души поздравляем воинов-десантников! Вся страна по праву гордится вашим героизмом, отвагой и несгибаемым духом! С праздником! Никто кроме вас! 🖋️ Я вижу
❤432❤🔥202👍60🫡50🙏22👎2
Братьев из 45-й гвардейской отдельной бригады спецназа ВДВ с праздником. Побеждает сильнейший! 🖋️ Я вижу
❤334🙏125🔥84🫡27❤🔥9👍6🥰3👎2
Возвращение. Герой картины – русский воин, за плечами которого идет война, но мы его видим в обыденной мирной жизни. Он остановился на пешеходном переходе через железнодорожные пути, и ты его случайно встречаешь в толпе. Взгляд сразу выхватывает человека в зелёном камуфляже на фоне индустриального пейзажа вокзала, и думаешь о нём: кто он? Он едет домой или наоборот в зону СВО? Он стоит уставший, скинув рюкзак к пар…
❤🔥388🙏223❤97👍33🕊12😢5👎1
Донецкое лето. 2026 🖋️ Я вижу
❤506🔥178🙏170❤🔥43👍15👎2
🤣 "На плечах плащом из пыли дремлет собственная тень", - услышал я и решил показать, как это выглядит. За рисунок спасибо талантливому художнику тг-канала "Я вижу". Комбат.
❤469🙏153👍60🔥45❤🔥22👎17🥰3😡3
⚡️Работайте, братья — Путин в обращении к военным
❤239🫡68👍34❤🔥16🙏10👎9😢9😡5
Старобельск. Царствие Небесное. Двадцать один ребёнок, убитый целенаправленным ударом ВСУ по педагогическому колледжу. 🖋️ Я вижу
🙏594😢312💔141🕊37❤35😭29🌚2😡2
Вчера в библиотеке города Лыткарино прошло открытие выставки работ "Я вижу", - канала, где появился один из самых первых портретов Командира. На открытии побывала супруга Николая: передала в фонд библиотеки книгу "СВОими глазами", ей же от художника проекта вручили последнюю работу, посвященную Коле.
🙏414❤118😢49🫡41👍16❤🔥10👎3
Готовим работы к выставке 🖋️ Я вижу
❤🔥368🔥142❤98👍41🙏3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mydrawingdiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mydrawingdiary edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Я вижу” (@mydrawingdiary), 16,978 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mydrawingdiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.