Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net +1,154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,687–17,490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 08:48
17,099
-38
5 Nov 2026, 06:57
17,137
-36
4 Nov 2026, 03:31
17,173
-23
3 Nov 2026, 04:51
17,196
-28
2 Nov 2026, 02:49
17,224
-22
31 Oct 2026, 23:29
17,246
-36
31 Oct 2026, 01:27
17,282
+254
29 Oct 2026, 23:48
17,028
+151
28 Oct 2026, 23:07
16,877
+47
27 Oct 2026, 21:48
16,830
+5
26 Oct 2026, 19:57
16,825
-3
25 Oct 2026, 19:30
16,828
+9
24 Oct 2026, 17:30
16,819
-2
23 Oct 2026, 20:20
16,821
-3
22 Oct 2026, 21:19
16,824
-8
21 Oct 2026, 20:47
16,832
-26
20 Oct 2026, 12:44
16,858
-31
19 Oct 2026, 09:17
16,889
-19
18 Oct 2026, 08:58
16,908
-39
17 Oct 2026, 11:05
16,947
first reading
Engagement
208 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 17,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,460
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.901%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 208 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
208 (16 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
138,397
Reactions total
1,135
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
243
Videos
210
Links
9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 45s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,240 reactions across 92 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😭
1,188
22.7%
🍓
1,057
20.2%
👍
961
18.3%
💘
689
13.1%
💋
550
10.5%
🐳
504
9.62%
🔥
291
5.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (2.50%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#فوری
بچه ها یه آگهی فرستادن برامون دیروز که امداد بود و گفتن که نصف فک و دهنش کنده شده و چیزی نمیتونه بخوره از درد، چون شهرشون کرمان بود و احتمال پیدا شدن کسی و امدادش خیلی کمتر بود بهشون گفتم خودشون کلینیک ببرن و با ممبرا هزینه امدادش رو جمع میکنیم
بردن دکتر و تشخیص کلسی ویروس دادن که یه بیماری پیش روندست و اگه درمان نشه کل صورتش و دهنش بافتش از بین میره و در کنار اون استفراغ و تب و... هم ایجاد کرده و کلا کشندست
…
رابطتت معلوم نیست چیه؟ تو سیچوئیشن شیپ موندی؟ یا فکر میکنی رقیب داری میخوای مطمئن شی😳؟
سر دوراهی موندی یا میخوای بدونیمهاجرت داری یا نه؟ پس از اینجا فال بگیر🕯️🃏
تازه فال روزانه ماه تولدتم میگه🙂↔️
Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @mygirlfriendddd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @mygirlfriendddd as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
46 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mygirlfriendddd named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@heavenforus1 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 16 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@isholip named in 3 posts, 10 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 19 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@agezedamboodi named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝖿ᥙ 𝗉ᥱrs᥆ᥒ . @my_persony · 37,489 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖻ɘ𝖺𝗍 . @istarbeat · 23,013 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
trashcandy @trashcandy · 62,434 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 18 September 2026
Save bkiram @bekiram_baby · 14 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 17 September 2026
Star Me @starme69 · 254,549 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
منِاو @janahousee · 19,739 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 September 2026
Verse Vibes @Lyricsteach · 40,428 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
POV @samepov · 51,617 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 August 2026
kill ourselves @letskills · 83,575 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
ســارای @saray_iiir · 46,969 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 October 2026
﮼انجمننهنگهاینَوازنده؛ @Dayan_Zhakaw · 32,822 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 4 September 2026
𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜 @toxcor · 43,700 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 26 August 2026
امبیتیآی دیلی. @OurMbtiDaily · 29,091 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 September 2026
• قفلیآمون • @Ghofliyamon · 42,096 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
Arianfar @arianfarco · 189,016 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
6 ژانویه @January0_6 · 28,535 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
هُبوط @Hubottt · 91,691 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 August 2026
محافظ @minemetanoia · 111 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 25 August 2026
عطرتنتو @yourperfuumm · 57,660 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 22 August 2026
𝐘𝐀𝐍.𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐘𝐒 بازی و تست @MakeYourCharacter · 112,223 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
” گا @GaArea · 58,444 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 25 August 2026
معشوقه مآه! @iPluie · 30,832 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
فعلا نمیدونم. @felanemidonm · 40,652 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
MEOW @meowmbti · 25 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اگه دوست دخترم بودی” (@mygirlfriendddd), 17,099 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mygirlfriendddd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.