Maxime Bernier repond à vos questions! https://www.youtube.com/live/alF2GhQobLI?si=9Xz2uB-aKSV3nJ_3
❤8👍1

Channel
@myl_traductions
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,874subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001805871987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @myl_traductions |
| Created | 9 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/myl_traductions |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 6,874 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 6,877 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 6,886 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 6,896 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:54 | 6,903 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 6,908 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 6,913 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 6,920 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 6,927 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 6,923 | +10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 6,913 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 6,920 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 6,921 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 6,921 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
858 reactions across 28 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 270 | 31.5% | |
| 🔥 | 215 | 25.1% | |
| 👏 | 99 | 11.5% | |
| 🤬 | 80 | 9.32% | |
| ❤ | 72 | 8.39% | |
| 😈 | 63 | 7.34% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 1.28% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 1.05% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 1.05% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 0.816% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 0.583% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 0.583% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 0.466% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.233% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.233% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.117% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 858 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Maxime Bernier repond à vos questions! https://www.youtube.com/live/alF2GhQobLI?si=9Xz2uB-aKSV3nJ_3
❤8👍1
🌼 Jerr Alain, Mathieu Bock-Côté 15/08/2026 Extrait : Whats Up Podcast ''Fréchette a fait un SALE COUP à Legault'' https://youtu.be/BG_WUCWhtvw?si=TwiI0aYFiUfc5cW1 🌼Tout nos liens 👇 https://linkmix.co/13630706
❤17🔥5💯1
🌼 Myriam Bohémier 13/08/2026 Message aux Canadiens blessés vaccinaux.. Myriam Bohémier (avocate bénévole) s’exprime lors d’un point de presse pour l’enquête Allison, une initiative non-partisane indépendante visant à écouter et documenter les témoignages des personnes ayant subi des blessures après les vaccins contre la COVID-19. Elle représente les blessés vaccinaux du Québec qui vont y témoigner. MERCI Myriam B…
👏27❤9👍6
🌼 Dr Charles Hoffe 13/08/2026 Le Dr Charles Hoffe, médecin de famille du sud de la Colombie-Britannique, raconte comment on lui a INTERDIT de CRITIQUER le VACCIN, alors même que ses patients subissaient des effets indésirables. De plus, tous les rapports D'EFFETS SECONDAIRES qu'il a soumis ont été CENSURÉS. Le SILENCE IMPOSÉ aux médecins n'a pas créé un consensus. Il a créé une ILLUSION de CONSENSUS. 🔴 Temoignag…
🤬25❤8🔥4🤡1🙏1
🌼 Stockwell Day 04/08/2026 Les valeurs musulmanes sont-elles vraiment des valeurs canadiennes ? Monsieur le Premier ministre Carney, toutes les valeurs musulmanes sont-elles des valeurs canadiennes ? S.v.p, pourriez-vous nous le dire.. 🌼Tout nos liens 👇 https://linkmix.co/13630706
🔥27💩8❤1
🌼 Stockwell Day 12/08/2026 L'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada demande l'expulsion. Le gouvernement dit non. Le Premier ministre Carney a approuvé le maintien au Canada d'un homme condamné pour viols en série et agressions sexuelles violentes. Sa réponse : « Gardez-le ici, ne le renvoyez pas. » 🌼Tout nos liens 👇 https://linkmix.co/13630706
🤬29🔥8🤮5❤2😡2💩1
🌼 Radio-Canada 12/08/2026 Les impacts économiques de l’immigration. Stéphane Marion explique que le Canada est pris dans un « piège démographique » à cause du rythme très élevé d’immigration récente. Le PIB réel par habitant : le niveau de vie canadien stagne (voire recule) depuis plusieurs années, alors que celui des États-Unis continue de progresser. Canada est mort économiquement » et « en marche vers l’effond…
🔥24❤4👍4😎1
🌼 CBC NEWS 07/08/2026 NÉGOCIATIONS 🇨🇦●🇺🇲 CUSMA Les négociations Canada-États-Unis approche, c'est prévu pour le 19 août.. Selon des sources citées par CBC News, Ottawa fait pression pour éviter de nouveaux tarifs douaniers et réduire ceux qui frappent déjà l'acier et l'aluminium. En échange, le Canada est prêt à des CONCESSIONS concrètes.. ➡️ Assouplissement des QUOTAS LAITIERS ➡️ LEVÉE des interdictions provinc…
👍19🤡8😁2🎉1
VOTE SUR LA RÉSOLUTION DE MISE EN ACCUSATION D'ANTHONY FAUCI POUR OUTRAGE AU CONGRÈS VOTE SELON LES LIGNES PARTISANES : RÉPUBLICAINS - 8 DÉMOCRATES - 5 La commission sénatoriale de la Sécurité intérieure et des Affaires gouvernementales (@HSGAC) a déclaré Anthony Fauci coupable d'outrage au Congrès après qu'il eut invoqué plus de 100 fois son droit au cinquième amendement contre l'auto-incrimination lors de l'audit…
👏28👍10❤5🔥1🙏1
🌼 Dr Paul Bryne 7/12/2017 La mort cérébrale est un mensonge... ☠️ ● Les gens ne se rendent même plus compte qu'il s'agit d'un mensonge et il s'agit d'un mensonge depuis le début. ● Ils ont alors inventé la mort cérébral pour obtenir la plupart des organes, mais aussi afin d'éviter de gaspiller de l'argent pour traiter les personnes (drogués) qui n'auront jamais de travail ou qu'ils vont juste vivre et ne pas mour…
😈17👍10🔥4❤3
🌼 ReeseReport 23/10/2024 Histoire de TJ Hoover.. Le prélèvement d’organes et mort cérébrale... Dans l’industrie médicale, il y a une énorme demande pour les organes vivants, c’est pourquoi le terme de mort cérébrale a été inventé. 🌼Tout nos liens 👇 https://linkmix.co/13630706
😈15👍6🔥3😡3
🌼 Robert F Kennedy Jr 05/08/2026 Aux États-Unis, plus de 103 000 patients attendent aujourd'hui une greffe. ● Le HHS retire le certificat de l'organisation "Network for Hope" un organisme de prélèvement d'organes dans plusieurs États américains. Les raisons sont graves : — Des patients orientés vers le don alors qu'ils n'auraient jamais dû l'être — Des défaillances dans le jugement clinique relevées dans près de 3…
👍17🙏5🔥3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @myl_traductions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@myl_traductions named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Myl traductions🌼” (@myl_traductions), 6,874 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myl_traductions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.