7 measurements spanning 35 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 00:17
161
+4
2 Sept 2026, 13:03
157
+8
26 Aug 2026, 12:43
149
+18
20 Aug 2026, 13:44
131
+4
14 Aug 2026, 09:27
127
+4
9 Aug 2026, 03:16
123
no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:16
123
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
16
80.0%
👏
3
15.0%
🔥
1
5.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What are you guys looking for in the next 3 months?
part-time internships59%
full-time internships47%
full-time roles24%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
That's a wrap for our first Hack & Hire🥳
Thank you everyone for spending your busy Friday afternoon with us. Crazy how much y'all could come up with in just over 3 hours.
Congratulations to those successfully formed a warm connection with the founders/representatives from the startups today. We wish you all the best!
For the rest, stay tuned ;) we have more coming 🚀🚀
The startups moving fastest aren't looking for perfect resumes.
They're looking for people who can solve problems, move fast, and build.
That's exactly what you'll be doing at Hack & Hire
D-1
Startup Spotlight #3: Influencees
An AI platform building the future of the creator economy.
🚀 7-figure valuation
🤖 Building AI products for creators and brands
📈 Opportunity to join the founding team
They're not looking for …
Stand a chance to win an all-expenses-paid internship in SF at Hack & Hire.
D-2.
Startup Spotlight #2: Neural Drive
Neural Drive is revolutionizing brain-computer interface technology to give millions with disabilities the independence they deserve.
🚀 Backed by Afore Capital
🏥 Running clinical grants and trials with Tan Tock Seng Hospital
🌉 Hiring exceptional builders for their SF team
Your challenge on 24 July:
E…
Tired of traditional hackathons?
Come solve a real GTM & Growth challenge at Hack & Hire, organised by Projet.
Startup Spotlight #1: Ren Education
A digital marking platform that transforms the way educators work.
🏆 Featured in The Straits Times
🎓 Piloted across 11 institutions in Singapore, including NUS
📈 Expanding rapidly
Here's what to expect:
💡 Work on a real GTM/Business Development problem
⏱️ 3.5 hours to d…
Tired of submitting the same CV to hundreds of companies? We are too.
Compete in a hiring hackathon and get direct access to founders from fast-growing startups in one afternoon. Winners walk away with guaranteed interviews.
You pick 1 of 3 tracks:
1. Product & AI: by Influencees, 7-figure valuation
2. GTM & Growth: by ren. featured on The Strait Times
3. Full-stack dev: by Neural Drive, SF-based startup backed by …
Hi guys welcome to Projet channel 🎉🎉
we are setting things up at the moment with many exciting plans to come. we will kickstart our first event in 2 weeks so stay tuned for the announcement!😊
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @myprojetco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What are you guys looking for in the next 3 months?
part-time internships59%
full-time internships47%
full-time roles24%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Projet” (@myprojetco), 161 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myprojetco.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.