Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МЫСЛЕКРАТИЯ

Channel

МЫСЛЕКРАТИЯ

@myslekratia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,304subscribers

-458 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002581694718
TypeChannel
Username@myslekratia
DescriptionДоступ к лекциям: https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=sA8s 🎓 Студент философского. Абсолютный скептик. Связь: @myslekratia_manager
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/myslekratia

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3047,0756,689.57 August 2026 — 6,762 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,762 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,761 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,742 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,719 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,700 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,681 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,075 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,027 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,017 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,992 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,952 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,774 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,713 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,448 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,408 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,378 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,408 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,398 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,371 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,359 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,339 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,314 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,304 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net -458. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,188–7,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 15:596,304-10
1 Nov 2026, 10:366,314-25
29 Oct 2026, 04:186,339-20
25 Oct 2026, 20:216,359-12
22 Oct 2026, 20:446,371-27
19 Oct 2026, 20:176,398-10
16 Oct 2026, 13:106,408+30
13 Oct 2026, 02:276,378-30
6 Oct 2026, 19:226,408-40
29 Sept 2026, 23:006,448-265
15 Sept 2026, 20:366,713-61
12 Sept 2026, 07:016,774-178
7 Sept 2026, 22:406,952-40
2 Sept 2026, 16:566,992-25
31 Aug 2026, 00:277,017-10
28 Aug 2026, 06:137,027-48
24 Aug 2026, 23:577,075+394
21 Aug 2026, 11:456,681-19
18 Aug 2026, 14:246,700-19
15 Aug 2026, 20:256,719first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 6,304 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held40 (22 April 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total32,889
Reactions total537
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
193
Videos
48
Links
112

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,954 reactions across 39 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,07955.2%
custom 528058530743821748566734.1%
custom 54674716653382734821728.80%
👎361.84%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,954 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 40 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @myslekratia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 April 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC759 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 546747166533827348214❤1

4 Nov 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,030 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💬 Напоминаю, что у меня есть свободный/бесплатный: Чат для общения Рад видеть каждого.❤️ p.s. не забудьте пройти каптчу для вступления

❤8

4 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,250 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 546747166533827348217❤7

3 Nov 2026, 20:24 UTC≈3,880 views111 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤85custom 528058530743821748518custom 54674716653382734826👎2

2 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,630 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🎓На Tribute вышла новая уже 4я лекция по философии науки: «Объяснение бывает разным» Какие альтернативные объяснения феноменального существуют, кроме научного? И в чём механизм данных объяснений? ❓ ❗️ Напоминаю, что подписка на Tribute даёт доступ к десяткам лекций и конспектов, а также общегрупповым онлайн-занятиям.

❤9

2 Nov 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,540 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

❌ По-настоящему новое произведение нельзя оценить по существующим критериям, потому что оно само создает новые. 🏫 Чтобы что-то оценить, нужны те или иные критерии и мерки. А мерки берутся из уже сделанного, из уже написанных книг, из уже написанных картин, уже созданных систем, которые до этого признали хорошими. 👀 Когда появляется вещь, которая на них не похожа, её меряют исходя из старых критериев, и она, разумее…

❤16custom 52805853074382174854custom 54674716653382734823

1 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,610 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Тот, кто боится пустоты, спешит заполнить её первой попавшейся кажущейся истиной. Скептик же делает обратное: выносит из себя всё сомнительное. Если и не наполняется этим, то хотя бы ощущает целостность. Как если бы в пустой комнате каждый мог бы узреть любой угол, ощутив её единство, нежели в захламлённой. Именно эта пустая целостность и есть наполнение. мыслекратия

❤21custom 52805853074382174856custom 54674716653382734824

31 Oct 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,870 views48 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

💬Говорю Славику: «накинь аргументов без ИИ». Славик:

❤31custom 528058530743821748513custom 54674716653382734824

29 Oct 2026, 19:17 UTC≈2,010 viewsread 6 November 2026

🎓На Tribute вышла новая лекция: «Наука и практика: кто кого ведёт?» Всегда ли наука опережала практику и как вообще практика соотносится с теорией ❓ ❗️ Напоминаю, что подписка на Tribute даёт доступ к десяткам лекций и конспектов, а также общегрупповым онлайн занятиям.

27 Oct 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,460 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🤡 До до «пересказа Шадова» Вот мой пост от 21 июля 2025 года: https://t.me/myslekratia/166 Я тогда Шадова не то чтобы не смотрел, я его даже не знал.

❤20custom 52805853074382174856custom 54674716653382734822

26 Oct 2026, 20:26 UTC≈2,360 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

1 файл версия для ПК. 2 файл версия для чтения с телефона. 📰Выкладываю трактат/книгу в том виде, в котором он есть, потому что, если буду доводить до идеала, никогда не выпущу. 1️⃣ Это 1-й труд из всего корпуса, самый простой и самый вводный. ✍️Я написал это, потому что о собственной смерти я не могу сказать от себя ни слова; всё, что у меня о ней было, взято у других и сказано с чужого места. ☠️Почти все ответы …

❤15custom 528058530743821748510

26 Oct 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,940 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Трактат дропаю?

  1. Да82%
  2. Не, не интерес18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @myslekratia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Oct 2026, 19:41 UTCAnonymous Poll271 voters

Трактат дропаю?

  1. Да82%
  2. Не, не интерес18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Apr 2026, 11:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz732 voters

Какая из перечисленных работ была издана только после смерти Гегеля на основе материалов его лекций и конспектов слушателей❓

  1. 📖Наука логики.19%
  2. 📖Философия права.18%
  3. 📖Эстетика.16%
  4. 📚Энциклопедия философских наук.24%
  5. 📚Феноменология духа.23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Apr 2026, 16:48 UTCAnonymous Poll1,010 voters approx.

Ваш любимый период в истории философии❓

  1. 🤩 Античность.48%
  2. 💪 Средневековье.8%
  3. ☀️ Эпоха Возрождения.7%
  4. ⚙️ Новое время.4%
  5. 🇩🇪 Немецкая классическая философия.23%
  6. 🔬Современная философия. XIX – XXI в.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МЫСЛЕКРАТИЯ” (@myslekratia), 6,304 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myslekratia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.