Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mystic Leaks

Channel

Mystic Leaks

@mysticleaks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,601subscribers

+118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002415319871
TypeChannel
Username@mysticleaks
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mysticleaks

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,48311,60911,5466 August 2026 — 11,483 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,483 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,488 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,495 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,491 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,495 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,494 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,499 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,513 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,546 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,562 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,572 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,579 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,574 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,570 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,571 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,579 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,581 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,582 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,590 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,597 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,591 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,603 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,600 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,595 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,586 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,596 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,590 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,588 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,596 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,609 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,601 subscribers11,6016 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,464–11,628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:4011,601-8
17 Sept 2026, 00:0211,609+13
15 Sept 2026, 03:4111,596+8
13 Sept 2026, 11:3811,588-2
11 Sept 2026, 12:3811,590-6
8 Sept 2026, 20:5611,596+10
3 Sept 2026, 11:5811,586-9
2 Sept 2026, 03:1711,595-5
1 Sept 2026, 03:0711,600-3
31 Aug 2026, 04:0711,603+12
30 Aug 2026, 00:3411,591-6
28 Aug 2026, 23:3311,597+7
28 Aug 2026, 02:5411,590+8
27 Aug 2026, 00:2411,582+1
26 Aug 2026, 02:5911,581+2
25 Aug 2026, 00:0511,579+8
23 Aug 2026, 10:0311,571+1
21 Aug 2026, 22:1811,570-4
19 Aug 2026, 21:0311,574-3
18 Aug 2026, 23:1411,577first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 12 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,226 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,28957.9%
🔥27112.2%
👎22710.2%
👍1627.28%
😱1114.99%
🤔542.43%
😢371.66%
🤡321.44%
😁231.03%
🥰130.584%
🤯70.314%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC≈30,000 views219 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Oh, we're not done YET! Since Pixel 11a mentions started appearing in Google's apps, we think it's time to drop the nuke! Without any further ado, let's get into it: Pixel 11a (Formosan) SKUs - GQ05X (ROW), GP1BL (JPN), G4XQ2 (NA) Colors - BLK (Black; Obsidian), GRN (Green; Olive), PPL (Purple; Frost), SLV (Silver; Fog) SoC - Tensor G6 (Malibu) GSC - Titan M3 (Epic) GPU - PowerVR C-Series CXTP-48-1536 Modem - Med

141👍34🔥28🤡11😱5

12 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈31,700 views224 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

By the way, this is how the Pixel 11 Pro Fold's back looks like in Pine color! Yes, we didn't bother adding watermarks to the leak. Don't forget to credit us thx Does it look better than the Pixel 10 Pro Fold? Let us know down below! Btw stay tuned for more leaks we've got a lot to leak ;)

159🔥37👍11👎9😢8

11 Jul 2026, 22:17 UTC≈22,500 views102 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @hentaiOS

Good morning everynyan, may we be blessed with more pipkin pippa walmart magic numbers this year More gacha games reviews to come

🤔54👎27🔥10😁8👍3

1 Jul 2026, 22:50 UTC≈48,900 views242 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Hey.. no, the leaker still hasn't been fired yet! It looks like Google's preparing a massive kernel upgrade for almost every Tensor-powered Pixel device, once again! Let's get straight to the details: Pixel 7 / 8 / 9 series: 6.1-android14 -> 6.12-android16 Pixel 10 series: 6.6-android15 -> 6.12-android16 Yes, as you probably noticed, the Pixel 6 isn't on the list and very likely won't get the upgrade due to its EO

174👍35🔥20😢9😁4

3 Jun 2026, 14:03 UTC≈52,200 views307 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

And... yeah, we're not done yet Following tradition, here's the full Pixel 2026 (Pixel 11) series wallpapers collection. Make sure to share them! (although they lowkey suck 🥀)

👎17797😢20😁9😱4

3 Jun 2026, 14:02 UTC≈42,800 views86 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

67👍11🤯7👎1

12 May 2026, 15:06 UTC≈71,100 views495 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

NO WAY.. Google is finally giving users actual Material YOU 😭🎨 It looks like Google is preparing a pretty major upgrade for the Wallpaper & Style app. We've discovered a brand-new color customization UI that allows users to manually adjust Material You colors and color variants 👀 Google added a dedicated color slider that lets users fine-tune the exact accent tone instead of being limited to the usual color palett

316🔥113👍33😱20🥰13

12 May 2026, 14:30 UTC≈55,200 views288 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

After the Android Show announcement, a lot of people thought Google's about to copy Liquid Glass 😭🥀 But well.. that's not what's happening here. Instead, it seems like Google's heavily expanding blur effects across the UI in Android 17! From what we've seen, blur has been added to: - Volume slider and expanded volume panel - Power menu UI - Lockscreen shortcuts and notifications - Home screen context menu We've a

204🔥38👍20🤡14👎12

12 May 2026, 13:31 UTC≈35,500 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://t.me/mysticgsi/3847 Here you go

😱5615🤡4👍2😁2

12 May 2026, 12:49 UTC≈31,200 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Should we post more leaks today, or keep the hype alive?

  1. Yes73%
  2. No9%
  3. G-E-M-I-N-I ✨35%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😱266

12 May 2026, 12:31 UTC≈35,700 views152 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

With big screens comes great expectations... maybe? 💻✨ Ahead of today's Google IO 2026 event, the overall expectations are quite high. So far, all we can do is wait a little longer and see what Google’s got up its sleeve. But based on previous statements and rumors, Big G might finally give us a first glimpse of its upcoming Desktop OS, the one set to replace ChromeOS (possibly as early as late 2026): AluminiumOS,

110🔥25👍13🤡3👎1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mysticleaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 May 2026, 12:49 UTCAnonymous Poll1,620 voters approx.

Should we post more leaks today, or keep the hype alive?

  1. Yes73%
  2. No9%
  3. G-E-M-I-N-I ✨35%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mystic Leaks” (@mysticleaks), 11,601 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysticleaks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.