26 measurements spanning 27 days, net -111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,923–11,068 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 01:36
10,940
-7
2 Sept 2026, 12:25
10,947
-1
1 Sept 2026, 11:25
10,948
-3
31 Aug 2026, 09:44
10,951
-1
30 Aug 2026, 06:56
10,952
-6
29 Aug 2026, 06:14
10,958
-7
28 Aug 2026, 05:43
10,965
+3
27 Aug 2026, 08:18
10,962
-8
26 Aug 2026, 10:03
10,970
-5
25 Aug 2026, 12:53
10,975
-5
24 Aug 2026, 12:38
10,980
-3
22 Aug 2026, 23:14
10,983
-10
21 Aug 2026, 09:26
10,993
-5
20 Aug 2026, 05:58
10,998
-1
19 Aug 2026, 08:12
10,999
-6
18 Aug 2026, 10:35
11,005
-1
17 Aug 2026, 10:46
11,006
-11
15 Aug 2026, 18:55
11,017
-1
14 Aug 2026, 11:18
11,018
-8
12 Aug 2026, 23:09
11,026
first reading
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 10,940 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
119 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
119
of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
119 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
170,906
Reactions total
26,420
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19m 10s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,420 reactions across 119 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5190679938147050158
10,840
41.0%
custom 5269211834606436245
9,313
35.2%
custom 5249483958894218169
6,267
23.7%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,420 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 119 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mysweet2015. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 119 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
не хочу говорить банальности, но я обязана сказать это. всю свою жизнь я становилась взрослее, оглядывалась назад и думала, что с каждым годом я была красивее и красивее. но я всё равно не могла насладиться своей красотой, хоть и была одержима ею. вот бы мне кто-нибудь сказал в детстве, что я красивая не из-за того, как выгляжу, а из-за того, какой я человек
pen15
люблю когда первые 3 недели учебы ощущаются офигенно, когда вроде бы ниче особо не задают и можно вайбить и даже наслаждаться жизнью, а на 4 неделю на тебя скидывают сто заданий у которых дедлайн через 5 минут и вообще нужно еще поучаствовать в 298393 проектах, о которых тебя не предупреждали и ты просто забываешь что такое сон
я безумно устала от нормализации онли фанс «моделинга» и его пропаганды в соц сетях, никто в здравом уме не будет поддерживать эту индустрию, так мерзко видеть комментарии под видео девушек “когда онлик?” и другие высказывания от сопляков;
“но это их выбор!”ни одна психически здоровая женщина не пойдет туда, где годами эксплуатируют женские тела, разрушают им жизни, где в конечном итоге они остаются, сдавшись;
мале…
— некоторые люди считают, что это немного противно ☺️
— мне нравится когда противно.
— правда? 😰
— вызови у меня отвращение, пожалуйста
***
— это странно.
— но тебе такое нравится.
— не настолько.
или
когда бейсик чувак, который хотел себе “weird” девушку, на самом деле оказался просто ларпом
мэй, 2002
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @mysweet2015. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“my 2015” (@mysweet2015), 10,940 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysweet2015.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
