Вера в дроп танкоина на мой акк исчезает.. до сих пор вытянуто 0. Контейнеров открыто было не столь много, как в прошлый год. Вот такое обещание я давал себе на 2026. Не то что бы был огромный выбор, но все же😄 Жаль разработчики не давали обещание сделать нормальный баланс по классу техники. Может и выполнили бы. И играть приятней бы стало. 💭 Чат |📱 Резервный ТГ | Список взятия 3 Отметок

Channel
Пуля ТВ
@nYJI9
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,033subscribers
-833 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001601161461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nYJI9 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nYJI9 |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 14,033 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:01 | 14,040 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:21 | 14,042 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:25 | 14,056 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:09 | 14,066 | -17 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 14,083 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:27 | 14,087 | -15 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 14,102 | -18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:14 | 14,120 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 14,128 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:10 | 14,133 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 14,140 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 14,152 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 14,154 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 14,159 | -23 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 14,182 | -17 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 14,199 | -3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 14,202 | -14 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 14,216 | -9 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 14,225 | first reading |
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.37%
- avg views ÷ 14,033 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,170
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (28 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 27,001 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 06:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (82.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Это КАПЕЦ! ВПЕРВЫЕ ЗА ДОЛГИЕ ГОДЫ! Очередной ивент на слив ресурсов🔥 Сервера не выдержали. Никогда такого не было 😄 В общем и целом от нагрузки сервера лестовской блицухи легли. Нашатырь уже несут. Будут поднимать. Так что сильно не пугайтесь. Дефолт) А, кстати, золотой першинг имеет суперфорс. На этом в целом все 🙂 💭 Чат |📱 Резервный ТГ | Список взятия 3 Отметок | 📱 Канал по Мир Танков
М60 повержен! 3 отметки на базе. 49ый танк в моем ангаре с 3мя отметками🔥 Открутку на сегодня выключили🙂 💭 Чат |📱 Резервный ТГ | Список взятия 3 Отметок | 📱 Канал по Мир Танков
Открываю МИСТИКИ, если не даю 3000 УРОНА на М60 📺 Трансляции📥 📱YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjN5VfzJ__E 📱ВК Видео Live: https://live.vkvideo.ru/nyji9 [Стрим завершен] 💭 Чат |📱 Резервный ТГ | Список взятия 3 Отметок | 📱 Канал по Мир Танков
РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ПЕРВОГО ВЕЧЕРНЕГО СТРИМА! Первый стрим новичка на ИС-7 🔥 Мой первый топ! 📣 Как вам? Сколько ставите раков от 1 до 10? 😄 Я результатами очень даже доволен. Танчик понравился! После ИС-3 и ОБ 257.. ИС-7 это божество! Тут есть броня! Офигеть) И орудие как будто комфортней. В течении следующих несколько дней будем выбирать танк на следующую прокачку💪 Стримы на этой неделе вечерние! Будем тестить как пойдет…
Рандому и так изда, но умы леста гейм казино добавляют нурсы в игру. Мне кажется у этих цель игру добить. Иначе я хер знает зачем они идут в этом направлении. Нурсы если что очень токсичные. Запредельно токсичные. Не ИМБА, но супер токсик в моменте. Первый прем с нурсами появился. К гадалке не ходи и ветка на подходе. Не удивлюсь, если именно после этого я с этой игры в соседнюю и уйду. Там хотя бы не так сильно гр…
Как же меня трясет от этой игры угнетения после ББ. Вы просто не представляете… Всей душой ненавижу это подобие киберспортивной игры. Проклинаю тех, кто привел игру в такое состояние. Позорище. Игра превратилась в добеги +w с эрой барабанов уже не малое время. И конечно кое каким гениями, которые вместо захода в игру чисто графики смотрят.. им насрать. Не помню уже времена, когда я получал удовольствие от данной …
Иди возьми 3 отметки Пуль. Получи положительные эмоции от игры. Поиграй с 6 барабанными танками из 7. Айда игра что бы расслабится. Жду бои по полторы минуты. Зато динамичнО! Какой контент в таких боях вообще можно воссоздать? Никакой позиционки и тактики. Газ в пол. Вот и весь бой. Игра движется 100% в правильном направлении😄 А тупорылая ЦА блица не изменится. 💭 Чат |📱 Резервный ТГ | Список взятия 3 Отметок
Вот бы с канала отписались все те, кому не интересен мой контент. Нафига подписывались то. Розыгрыши для халявщиков я проводить давно перестал. И возобновлять не буду.
Новое видео уже на канале! Гоу продвинем его. Формат обучающий👍 Давно такие видео уже не делал. Не успевал за ребалансами 🙂 Ссылка на видео 👇 🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPNbGzXiI-w 🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPNbGzXiI-w 🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPNbGzXiI-w 💭 Чат |📱 Резервный ТГ | Список взятия 3 Отметок | 📱 Канал по Мир Танков
Видос переносится на день⚠️ Сегодня закончить его и выложить вовремя не получилось. Постримить соответственно под такую музычку не лучший вариант. Хейтер на соседе был против😡 💭 Чат |📱 Резервный ТГ | Список взятия 3 Отметок | 📱 Канал по Мир Танков
Видос в пятницу ✔️ Тему заранее не скажу🧐
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @nYJI9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@nYJI9 edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Бесконечные снаряды это говножопамоча или годное нововведение?
- Годнота👍38%
- Говножопамоча💩62%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@afectnews · 34,709
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
@BlitzTimes · 41,586
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
@WotPUB · 59,589
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
@tanksblitz · 81,578
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@lexa_sniper · 19,284
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 October 2026
@roflblitz · 34,732
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
@Blitz_678_werty · 41,822
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
@tanks_blitz_official · 469,809
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 August 2026
@hardblitz · 34,975
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
@mad_maks_blitz · 57,142
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
@wotblitzofficiaI · 24,381
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 September 2026
@zlobinachannel · 18,922
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 October 2026
@sensei_says_tg · 34,783
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
@wotblitz · 31,078
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
@gerandtv · 51,766
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пуля ТВ” (@nYJI9), 14,033 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nYJI9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.