делимся штуками для истинных любителей кошек 🤘
custom 53980089831663985856😎2❤1custom 52490824095168035331

Channel
@nado_concept_store
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,657subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002365411563 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nado_concept_store |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nado_concept_store |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 1,657 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 1,656 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 1,658 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 1,659 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 1,664 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 1,666 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 1,662 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 1,661 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 1,665 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 1,658 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 1,651 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 1,654 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
122 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5398008983166398585 | 48 | 39.3% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5353076362460544746 | 14 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5249082409516803533 | 10 | 8.20% | |
| custom 5400212868324928869 | 8 | 6.56% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 5.74% | |
| custom 5235736120767032242 | 4 | 3.28% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 1.64% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
делимся штуками для истинных любителей кошек 🤘
custom 53980089831663985856😎2❤1custom 52490824095168035331
сделали подборку для любителей собак! сохраняй к себе или присылай хозяину четвероногого друга, чтобы не забыть заглянуть к нам в магазинчик 🐶⭐️
custom 539800898316639858519💘7custom 52490824095168035337❤1
+ к летнему вайбу! ☀️ 🏖️
❤22custom 53980089831663985858custom 54002128683249288698custom 52490824095168035332
недавно получили поставку необыкновенных кружек от бренда «боргата» для чаепития под теплым летним дождем листай и выбирай свою ☕️🫖
custom 539800898316639858515custom 535307636246054474614❤5custom 52357361207670322424
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @nado_concept_store. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“нáдо” (@nado_concept_store), 1,657 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nado_concept_store.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.