Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 18 days, net -68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,037–5,125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 03:57
5,047
-17
12 Sept 2026, 18:38
5,064
-16
8 Sept 2026, 19:37
5,080
-18
3 Sept 2026, 18:41
5,098
-15
31 Aug 2026, 03:35
5,113
-2
30 Aug 2026, 10:47
5,115
no change
30 Aug 2026, 10:30
5,115
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 05s
Average length
3m 33s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
781 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
557
71.3%
👍
149
19.1%
👏
38
4.87%
❤🔥
15
1.92%
😍
15
1.92%
🕊
3
0.384%
🔥
2
0.256%
🥰
2
0.256%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 781 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
کلاً «توضیحات طولانی» نداشته باشید
بچهها وقتی میشنون «حالا گوش کنید تا توضیح بدم»، سریع میرن روی حالت دفاعی و حوصلهشون سر میره.
به جای حرف زدن، «اکشن » نشون بدید. برو جلوی تخته، یه کاغذ بزرگ بذار و شروع کن به کشیدن یه چیز خیلی باحال. وقتی ببینن داری یه چیز جذاب میکشی، خودشون میپرن میگن: «وای خانم این چطوری شد؟». اونجاست که تو میتونی خیلی کوتاه و سریع تکتک نکتههای فضاسازی رو بهشون بگی.
به جای «فضاسازی»، ب…
The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📌 ما چرا اینجا هستیم؟
درود به همهی شما مامانهای عزیز و مربیان و معلمان هنرمندم! ❤️🎨
خیلی خوشحالم که اینجا هستید 🌸
سالهاست که دارم نقاشی میکشم و با بچهها و مربیها سروکار دارم، اما همیشه یه چیزی ذهنم رو درگیر میکرد...
میدیدم که خیلی از مامانها دوست دارن با بچههاشون کار کنن اما نمیدونن از کجا شروع کنن. از اون طرف، مربیهای خیلی بااستعدادی رو میشناختم که عاشق آموزش بودن، ولی راه و چاهِ کلاسداری و شناخت ب…
اینم از تخم مرغ زنده ی ما که تبدیلش کردیم به نقاشی با نمک
دیدی چقدر راحت با خلاقیت و وسایل اطرافت میتونی نقاشی بکشی و حتی برا نقاشی داستان فان بسازی 😍👆
این یه تخم مرغ که همه باهاش آشنایی داریم 😊
حالا میخوایم تبدیل کنیم به یه نقاشی و خلاقیت تا بچه ها لذت ببرند و با همین تخم مرغ ساده
تصویرسازی کنند..... آماده ای ؟
اگه آماده ای قلب قشنگو بزن ❤️
بچهها توی این سن دارن دنیا رو با تخیلشون میسازن، نه با واقعیت.
واسه همین ممکنه واسهشون ابر نارنجی باشه چون خورشید روش تابیده، یا چون اون لحظه حس خوبی داره
وقتی بهشون گیر میدیم که چرا این رنگ رو زدی، داریم خلاقیتشونو خاموش میکنیم...
نقاشی واسه بچهها فقط یه سرگرمی نیست، یه جور ابراز احساساته.
پس تا قبل از دبستان، بهشون اجازه بدیم با هر رنگی که دلشون خواست، دنیای خودشونو بسازن.
تو سن خودشون، این یعنی اوج هنرمندی…
خب مربی جون، بیاید جواب سوال امروز رو با هم مرور کنیم
(درخت بدون برگ + کلی برگ روی زمین)
راستش این نقاشی چندتا معنی میتونه داشته باشه و بستگی به شرایط اون بچه داره، ولی چندتا احتمال قوی داریم:
1️⃣ احتمال قوی اول:
اگه بچه فصلها رو میشناسه، خیلی وقتا اینطوری پاییز رو نشون میده!
یعنی خودش فهمیده که درختا تو پاییز برگاشونو میریزن
(چقدر باهوش!)
2️⃣ احتمال دوم:
بعضی وقتا هم این مدل نقاشی نشونهی غمه...
مثلاً بچه ممک…
⁉️جواب درست چیه؟
‼️یا اصلاً درست و غلطی وجود داره؟
🌀منتظرم نظراتتون رو بخونم، بعدش با هم تحلیل کنیم
😍15👍6❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @naem_academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2025 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@naem_academy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@artmorabi named in 2 posts, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانال درنا شریفی سلام آگاهی @Dornasharifi · 39,857 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مربیگری نقاشی کودکان” (@naem_academy), 5,047 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naem_academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.