راه جنگجویان برای غلبه بر خودبینی و دستیابی به آزادی ادراک
کانال یوتیوب
https://www.youtube.com/c/shamanismtoltec
کانال منابع
@nagualism_media
اینستاگرام
instagram.com/nagualism
Instagram.com/shamanism_toltec
فیسبوک
fb.com/shamanism.toltec
Created
Between 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net +229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,699–11,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 17:17
11,962
+4
4 Nov 2026, 18:47
11,958
-3
3 Nov 2026, 18:21
11,961
-1
2 Nov 2026, 16:31
11,962
+1
1 Nov 2026, 13:50
11,961
+2
31 Oct 2026, 12:11
11,959
+1
30 Oct 2026, 12:17
11,958
+5
29 Oct 2026, 11:38
11,953
-4
28 Oct 2026, 05:58
11,957
+9
27 Oct 2026, 04:47
11,948
+10
25 Oct 2026, 02:44
11,938
-3
24 Oct 2026, 04:31
11,941
+6
23 Oct 2026, 03:30
11,935
+5
22 Oct 2026, 05:19
11,930
-1
20 Oct 2026, 23:17
11,931
-5
20 Oct 2026, 00:35
11,936
+2
18 Oct 2026, 23:55
11,934
-1
17 Oct 2026, 22:37
11,935
+8
16 Oct 2026, 23:19
11,927
-1
15 Oct 2026, 22:48
11,928
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.9%
avg views ÷ 11,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,980
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
59 (6 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
29,830
Reactions total
719
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,950
Videos
≈40
Links
≈1,240
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,664 reactions across 59 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,881
61.8%
🔥
470
10.1%
👍
459
9.84%
💯
250
5.36%
❤🔥
224
4.80%
👏
110
2.36%
🕊
71
1.52%
🙏
52
1.11%
👌
33
0.708%
😁
29
0.622%
🤔
21
0.45%
🥰
18
0.386%
😍
12
0.257%
🤯
12
0.257%
😢
9
0.193%
🐳
6
0.129%
🌚
3
0.064%
🤩
3
0.064%
🤬
1
0.021%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ترحم به خود و خود بزرگ بینی ظالمان واقعی هستند؛ آنها مانع از این می شوند که مردم چیزها را به وضوح ببینند.
بنابراین، اگر واقعاً می خواهید کاری برای خود انجام دهید، شروع کنید به مبارزه با ان دشمنان همین الان از همین امروز...
اما چگونه می توانم این کار را انجام دهم؟
با دقت و سنجش تمام جوانب هوشیار ماندن و آگاهی از هر عمل، هر فکر و احساسی که به شما حمله می کند؛ با تعقیب خستگی ناپذیر خود و تسلیم نشدن در برابر نقصان های …
در مرور دوباره، به راحتی میتوان سکوت درونی جمع کرد.
چیزهای دنیای روزمره تأثیر خود را بر ما سست میکنند و با دیدن آن موقعیت در مرور خود به لایه دیگری از آگاهی میتوانیم شیفت کنیم.
این یک تصمیم روزمره است که هر روز تجدید میشود. با آن درک ما از جهان تغییر خواهد کرد. زیرا به آن منبع انرژی درونی دسترسی خواهیم داشت.
🪶از یادداشت های ساحر
🆔 @nagualism
سکوت درونی برای شمنان سنت دونخوان همواره با تاریکی ارتباط داشت، شاید چون ادراک بشر، بدون ملازم عادی خود، گفتگوی درونی، در چیزی سقوط میکند که به سوراخی تیره شباهت دارد.
او گفت که طبق معمول بدن کار میکند، اما آگاهی تیزتر میشود.
تصمیمات فوراً گرفته میشود و به نظر میرسد ریشه در نوع خاصی از دانش دارند که وابستۀ بیان افکار نیستند.
📕 حرکات جادویی
🆔 @nagualism
(دون خوان پس از شنیدن داستانهای کاستاندا در مورد دوستانش و اینکه خود کاستاندا هم مثل دوستانش پر از ناله و شکایتهای اندوهبار است به او گفت:)
اینها بالا و پایین های زندگی روزمره است. می بَری و می بازی و نمی دانی که چه موقعی می بَری و چه موقعی می بازی. این قیمتی است که شخص می پردازد وقتی که تحت سلطۀ خود اندیشی زندگی می کند. حرفی که بتوانم به تو بگویم ندارم و تو هم حرفی نداری که به خودت بزنی.
فقط می توانم سفارش کنم که …
بینندگان کهن پس از آنکه به «رویابینانی» که در خواب بودند توجه کردند، راه حلی یافتند که بنا برآن گذاشتند تا «رویاها» سیر طبیعی خود را طی کند. آنها «دیده» بودند که پیوندگاه «رویابین» در بعضی از رویاها بیشتر از رویاهای دیگر به اعماق سوی چپ می رود. این نگرش، این مسئله را برای آنان مطرح کرد که آیا محتوای رویا باعث جابجایی پیوندگاه می شود یا حرکت پیوندگاه بخودی خود با فعال ساختن فیوضات استفاده نشده محتوای رویا را به وجود م…
جهان موجودات غیر آلی همواره آماده حمله است ولی دنیای ما هم همین طور است. به همین علت وقتی به آن قلمرو می روی دقیقا طوری بروی که گویی به منطقه ای جنگی گام می نهی.
منظورت اینست که رویابینان همواره باید از آن دنیا بترسند، دون خوان؟
- نه منظورم این نیست. وقتی رویابینی به جهانی رفت که در پس خوان دوم است یا وقتی که رویابینی حاضر نشد به آن به عنوان راه چاره ای پابرجا بنگرند، دیگر دردسری وجود ندارد.
دون خوان اظهار داشت ف…
-اگر در دام افتیم چه اتفاقی می افتد دون خوان؟
- اگر در دام افتی، قیمت را می پردازی و قیمت بستگی به شرایط و عمق افتادن دارد ولی واقعا نیازی نیست که درباره چنین احتمالهایی صحبت کنیم. زیرا ما در اینجا با مساله مجازات مواجه نیستیم.
این امر به جریانهای انرژی مربوط می شود، جریانهایی از انرژی شرایطی پدید می آورد که وحشتناک تر از مرگ است. هر چیزی در طریقت ساحران مسأله مرگ و زندگی است ولی در راه رویا دیدن این امر صد بار بی…
راه رویا دیدن پر از دام، پر از گودالهای سر پوشیده است و اجتناب از این گودالها یا افتادن در آنها ماجرای خصوصی و انفرادی هر رویا بین است.
این دامها نتیجه وادادن در برابر چاپلوسی و مداحی است یا قولهای قدرت؟
- نه فقط وادادن برای این چیزها، بلکه تسلیم شدن به هر چیزی که موجودات غیر آلی به ما پیشنهاد می کنند. ساحران هیچ چاره ای ندارند جز اینکه آنچه را آنها پیشنهاد می کنند تا حد خاصی بپذیرند.
- و آن حد خاص چیست؟
- این ح…
وقتی آن بیرون با ناشناخته ای باورنکردنی مواجهیم، دروغ های حقارت آمیز و احمقانه نمی گوییم. دروغ های حقارت آمیز فقط برای مردمی است که هرگز ندیده اند آن بیرون چه خبر است و چه چیزی منتظر آنهاست.
📒هنر رویا دیدن
🆔 @nagualism
درحالیکه بر روی تخته سنگی مینشست گفت: آنچه تو نیاز داری این است که بیاد بیاوری که تو یک مهمان در زمین هستی. ما میتوانیم که روی صخرهها استراحت کنیم به درختان تکیه دهیم یا بسادگی در خرمایی انگشتمان را فرو کنیم. اما متوجه نیستیم که میتوانیم از چیزهای کوچک انرژی بگیریم چرا که باور داریم که بعنوان فاتحان زمین اینجا حضور داریم.
برروی سنگی نشستم. بلافاصله احساس کردم که در اثر فشرده شدن استخوان دنبالچهام مقداری انرژی از…
پرسیدم: جهانهای دیگر چه تفاوتی باهم دارند؟
اوگفت: دنیایی که ما در آن متولد شدیم جامد است و برمبنای قوانین فیزیکی مواد آلی تعیّن مییابد. خطی است و بطرز قابل مشاهدهای بر مبنای فضا و زمان سازماندهی شده است.
اما با انرژی کافی ما میتوانیم از موانعی که دنیاها را ازهم سوا کرده عبور کنیم. دنیاهایی که درآنها انرژی غیرآلی است، خطی نیست بلکه مدوّر است، همواره هست و بی زمان است. برمبنای ماده شکل نگرفته بلکه برحسب آگاهی و …
❤71🔥17👍13❤🔥10💯4👏1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @nagualism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اشـoshoـو @oshoi · 19,864 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
تفحص خویش @selfinquiry · 21,618 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
شمس تبریزی و مولانا @ShamsMowlana · 46,188 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
⚖️ DNA_Pluse⚖️ @dnapluse · 29,859 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جادو درمانگران شمن” (@nagualism), 11,962 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nagualism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.