Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -774. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88,761–89,894 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 05:41
88,892
-106
16 Sept 2026, 19:22
88,998
+86
15 Sept 2026, 01:21
88,912
-92
13 Sept 2026, 11:19
89,004
-73
11 Sept 2026, 12:17
89,077
-115
8 Sept 2026, 17:18
89,192
-94
5 Sept 2026, 08:39
89,286
-47
3 Sept 2026, 14:40
89,333
-20
2 Sept 2026, 07:48
89,353
-37
1 Sept 2026, 05:55
89,390
-37
31 Aug 2026, 04:35
89,427
-29
30 Aug 2026, 04:34
89,456
-52
29 Aug 2026, 04:46
89,508
-61
28 Aug 2026, 01:33
89,569
-56
26 Aug 2026, 22:56
89,625
-16
25 Aug 2026, 22:17
89,641
-31
24 Aug 2026, 18:45
89,672
+39
23 Aug 2026, 03:36
89,633
-11
21 Aug 2026, 15:58
89,644
-55
20 Aug 2026, 11:04
89,699
first reading
Engagement
230 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.98%
avg views ÷ 88,892 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,090
123 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
124
of 230 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
230 (2 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
872,320
Reactions total
9,431
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,590
Videos
≈1,370
Links
≈1,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
28m 49s
Average length
1m 48s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20,566 reactions across 229 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,364
26.1%
❤
3,036
14.8%
😁
2,265
11.0%
🔥
2,232
10.9%
🤯
1,593
7.75%
😐
1,519
7.39%
😭
1,229
5.98%
👎
1,139
5.54%
custom 5307998941227270046
746
3.63%
💯
368
1.79%
🤝
327
1.59%
🙏
202
0.982%
😱
137
0.666%
👏
95
0.462%
🤬
78
0.379%
🤩
58
0.282%
🥰
49
0.238%
🤷
43
0.209%
👌
38
0.185%
😈
31
0.151%
3 further kinds
17
0.083%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 229 of the 230 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,566 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
98
across the posts below
Posts paid on
50
of 229 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @namarketplacewithleo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 230 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❤️ РВБ уточнил окончательный список документов, которые маркетплейс будет запрашивать у продавцов товара с 1 октября 2026
Вопреки ранее обсуждавшейся информации- в перечень не вошли документы на товар, в тч декларации об уплате ввозного НДС. Всё ограничилось разрешительными документами: сертификаты и декларации о соответствии, СГР ( свидетельство о государственной регистрации).
Аналогичный перечень будет запрашиват…
❤️ Эфир по изменениям с 1-го октября и возможным блокировкам вашего кабинета завершился.
Спасибо, что были с нами! Теория — это хорошо, но пора переходить к практике и вашим личным цифрам. На дворе конец сентября, а это значит, что Высокий сезон (11.11, Черная пятница, Новый год) уже почти стартовал.
И к нему нужно быть готовым. Не только документы, но и всё что касается ранжирования и продвижения. Без четкого план…
❤️ Друзья, плиз, проголосуйте за канал. Виртуально обниму каждого. При встрече, ещё могу и лично)
UPD: часть обнимашек 🤗 уже улетело. Спасибо)
https://t.me/boost/namarketplacewithleo
❤️ Продажи пухов с нашего сайта.
Конечно маловато фактуры и расчетов, но тогда видео будет длинным и я в театр опоздаю)
Если нужны подробности и вся математика, то ставьте лайк.
❤️ Красные флаги перед 1 октября. Игнорируем или нет?
Сертификат может пройти проверку, а рядом всё равно останется красный флаг «документы не найдены» — просто потому, что система отдельно ждёт другой тип документа.
И в данном случае смотреть нужно не на цвет значка, а на причину статуса.
Что проверить по карточке уже сейчас:
•какой ТН ВЭД указан
•какие документы реально обязательны именно для этого товара
•совпа…
❤️ Ozon будет компенсировать затраты на страховку селлерам, продающим сегмент фэшион.
Маркетплейс запускает программу для продавцов одежды, обуви и аксессуаров. До конца года Ozon будет ежемесячно начислять бонус, равный стоимости страхования fashion-товаров по полису «Ингосстраха».
Зачем это нужно?
В fashion продавцы вынуждены отгружать много позиций: покупатели часто заказывают сразу несколько размеров и моделей,…
❤️ Аналитики пересмотрели прогноз по онлайн-продажам на 2026 год
Прогноз от декабря 2025: 10 млрд заказов, 15,4 трлн ₽ GMV.
Рост +20% и +15% год к году.
Прогноз от сентября 2026: 9,6 млрд заказов, 15 трлн ₽.
Рост +16% и +12,5% год к году.
Причина снижения онлайн продаж очевидна – атаки на склады маркетплейсов. Как следствие отмена части заказов, увеличение сроков доставки, сокращение ассортимента и страх получить …
❤️ Сервис WB taxi заработал в Армении
Wildberries запустил WB Taxi в Армении, открыв ранний доступ к сервису в Ереване.
В ближайшие недели доступ будет постепенно расширяться, приложение можно будет скачать в Google Play и App Store.
У такси предусмотрено три тарифа: «Стандарт», «Комфорт», «Мульти» (поиск машины в двух категориях сразу, супер функционал 🤣).
На самом деле, сначала что в России фиолетовое такси нам…
❤️С 1 октября маркетплейсы переходят на жесткие автоматические проверки по закону о платформенной экономике и новым требованиям.
Судя, по текущей скорости ответа их поддержки, разблокировать карточку, даже попавшую под блок ошибочно, будет очень небыстрой процедурой. Поэтому готовиться надо уже сейчас.
В чем могут быть причина блокировки: сертификаты и где они были выданы, декларации и отказные письма, автоматическ…
❤️ Теперь Озон. Делает всё, чтобы мы грузили на FBO.
Сначала уменьшение скидки по FBS, а теперь год бесплатного хранения на складах. И бесплатный кроссдокинг.
Увеличили срок размещения без платы для всех поставок, принятых с 22 сентября по 31 декабря 2026 года, на всех объектах Ozon:
🔵 для обычных товаров — не будем брать плату 344 дня вместо 99;
🔵 для пожароопасных товаров — тоже 344 дня вместо 39;
🔵 для крупногаб…
😐22👍10❤4🤯3custom 53079989412272700462
Showing the 12 most recent of 230 posts we hold for @namarketplacewithleo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@namarketplacewithleo edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@namarketplacewithleo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@merkatys_consult named in 6 posts, 9 August 2026 – 21 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дмитрий Москаленко | Бизнес на маркетплейсах с MpSkill @msk_966 · 21,474 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
Бизнес с Китаем | Дмитрий Хван @demesickk · 27,075 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
WB Партнёры @wbsellerofficial · 181,939 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
MPSTATS @analyticsmpstats · 21,381 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
💰MarketGuru | Секреты Wildberries @marketguruclub · 39,943 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Рома Райт @romarayt · 47,462 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Wildbox.News @wildbox_news · 87,307 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
Ozon Marketplace @ozonmarketplace · 110,003 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
Вячеслав Малых @seotrener1 · 27,938 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
Т-Бизнес секреты: онлайн-продажи, маркетплейсы, ecom @bs_marketplace · 27,012 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Ozon и партнёры ПВЗ @ozonapvz · 67,264 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На маркетплейсах c Лео Шевченко ️” (@namarketplacewithleo), 88,892 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/namarketplacewithleo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.