Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @nanzun 男尊

Channel

@nanzun 男尊

@nanzun1

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002791766027
TypeChannel
Usernames@nanzun @nanzun1
Created12 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged7 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nanzun1

Growth

343.512 August 2026 — 3 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4 subscribers12 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 13 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 09:374no change
21 Aug 2026, 01:254+1
13 Aug 2026, 17:473no change
12 Aug 2026, 04:173first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 12 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

10 Apr 2026, 12:34 UTC14 viewsread 13 August 2026

😢NFT @xizun 喜尊 😢NFT @pizun 屁尊 😢NFT @fengzun 凤尊 封尊 😢NFT @lanzun 蓝尊 😢NFT @nanzun 男尊 😢NFT @kuangzun 狂尊 😢NFT @niezun 聂尊 😢NFT @zunsun 尊孙 😢NFT @nansun 南孙 男孙

6 Nov 2025, 02:10 UTC46 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

NFT 官网一口价,喜欢的直接拍。🧧 更多nft用户名 @tg8tg 🇸🇰 NFT列表: 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- usdt 购买联系 @ganjiang 干将

6 Nov 2025, 02:09 UTC45 viewsread 13 August 2026

https://fragment.com/username/@nanzun 😢NFT @nanzun 男尊

20 Sept 2025, 01:43 UTC43 viewsread 13 August 2026

用户名nft出售列表(7) 😢NFT @xizun 喜尊 😢NFT @pizun 屁尊 😢NFT @fengzun 凤尊 封尊 😢NFT @lanzun 蓝尊 😢NFT @nanzun 男尊 😢NFT @kuangzun 狂尊 😢NFT @niezun 聂尊 😢NFT @zunsun 尊孙 😢NFT @nansun 南孙 男孙 😢NFT @kaidie 凯爹 😢NFT @kaojie 靠姐 😢NFT @mengjie 梦姐 😢NFT @kangjie 康姐 康杰 😢NFT @kuanmei 款妹 😢NFT @pengmei 彭妹 😢NFT @lieer 烈儿 @lieerbaobei 烈儿宝贝 😢NFT

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nanzun1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 60 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@nanzun 男尊” (@nanzun1), 4 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nanzun1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.