Channel
@napolyane2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,043subscribers
+107 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001603415033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @napolyane2 |
| Created | 4 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/napolyane2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 2,043 | +94 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 1,949 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:05 | 1,945 | +12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 1,933 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 1,935 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 1,939 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 1,942 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 1,941 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 1,937 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 1,939 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 1,937 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 1,936 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 1,936 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
466 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 205 | 44.0% | |
| 👍 | 93 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 70 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5291995888787406687 | 47 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5445284980978621387 | 36 | 7.73% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 1.29% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.858% | |
| custom 5427038941997976075 | 3 | 0.644% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.429% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 466 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Факел в этом сезоне создает тренды, а прошло всего 2 тура. Головка сыра разлетелась так, что в следующем туре Зенит лучшему игроку матча вручил арбуз . А видео с обидчиками, РПЛ обыграли в афиши матча. 🏆На Поляне
❤11👍6custom 54452849809786213873custom 52919958887874066872
Друзья, открытая тренировка Факела и интервью с новичком команды Ходейфа Эль-Мхассани ВК📱 Ютуб 🔥
❤11custom 52919958887874066873custom 54452849809786213873👍2
Встречайте, главный релиз года – РПЛ 2026/27 🐻 Системные требования потянут все 😉 Кто выкупил все отсылки, отмечаетесь в комментариях ⬇️
❤8custom 52919958887874066873custom 54452849809786213873
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 544528498097862138713❤8custom 52919958887874066873
Ильнур Альшин после матча Факел - Динамо Москва (Расшифровка) - Ильнур, на сегодняшней игре Динамо чем-то вообще удивило или были готовы? - Ну, мы разбирали соперника. Ну, понятно, Динамо - топ-клуб, и у них, в принципе, играл уже второй состав. Ну, не второй состав, там ребята, кто в ротации, кто не играли. Поэтому, не то, что удивило, мы понимали, как они будут играть в целом. -Несколько матчей Факел играет, и к…
❤12🔥3custom 52919958887874066873custom 54452849809786213873
Послематчевый комментарий Тимофея Маринкина: - Ты дебютировал при Ролане Гусеве, Динамо начало сезон с новым тренером, в чем основная разница с Сандро Шварцем? - Даже незнаю в чем основная разница, наверное в том, что один немец, другой русский. - Но кажется, что футбол стал более интенсивным и стало больше прессинга - За Динамо при первом заходе Шварца я смотрел на трибунах. Футбол отличается, больше прессинга,…
❤6👍2
Новый для меня формат, как вам?) Подпишись | Денис Курьянов
👍11❤4
Антон Ковалев после матча «Факел» - «Динамо» — Антон, ты выиграл Кубок Белоруссии, какие главные отличия от Кубка России? — Мастерство. Футболисты индивидуально очень сильные, только в этом. Но не скажу, что в Белоруссии очень слабый уровень, просто чуть-чуть ниже. — «Динамо» сегодня удивило? Или были готовы? — Мы были готовы, да. Старались, но доля удачи была на стороне «Динамо». — Тебя долго не было в «Факеле»…
❤9custom 54452849809786213872
Сделали небольшой подарок нашему новичку 🏆#ФакелДинамо | На Поляне
👍31❤11🔥9
Алексей Сутормин после матча «Факел» — «Динамо» (расшифровка) — Алексей, больше всего интересно узнать про ваш гол «Краснодару». Показалось, что вы всё видели и, как говорится, «зряча в домик пробили»? — Если честно, там была доля везения, удача, так сказать. Хотел даже пробить в ближний угол, чуть туда не получилось, но мяч оказался у Стаса между ног. Хорошо, что повезло: давно мне лично не везло, и так сложилось,…
❤14👍6custom 54452849809786213873
Ильнур Альшин после матча Факел - Динамо • Чем удивило Динамо • Что не хватает Факелу • Тяжелый старт, был ли готов к плохому началу сезона 🏆#ФакелДинамо | На Поляне
❤11custom 52919958887874066874custom 54270389419979760753
Матвей Бардачев после матча Факел - Динамо - Есть понимание, как исправить ситуацию, три последних матча — три поражения? - Трудно сказать, наверное мы с каждой игрой находим себя. У нас вся игра сводится в концовку, с Махачкалой в концовке пропустили, с Краснодаром в конце два забили и сейчас в конце пропустили. Наверное надо на протяжении 90 минут держать концентрацию и все прийдет. Сезон только начинается. - Со…
👍12❤8custom 52919958887874066874
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @napolyane2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На Поляне🥇” (@napolyane2), 2,043 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/napolyane2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.