УДАЛЯЕМ НА-ВСЕ-ГДА УСПЕЛ ПОДПИТЬСЯ?! 3..2..1..

Channel
𝕊𝘵𝕠𝑚𝗸𝙰|нарезки Токио Хотел/запросы/боты
@narezkutoma
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
519subscribers
+90 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003159535613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @narezkutoma |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/narezkutoma |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 25% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 519 | +18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 501 | +21 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:29 | 480 | +16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 464 | +19 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 445 | +14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 431 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 429 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 429 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👀 | 7 | 46.7% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 33.3% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
первый приз уже выдан!!! быстрее подписываемся на спонсоров, может ты следующий)!!!
ТОП САМЫХ ГОРЯЧИХ КАНАЛОВ ПО TOKIO HOTEL! Не упусти шанс подписаться, пока они ещё доступны! 1.канал по разнообразным очаровательным эстетам, коллажам, общению, а также по интересным ботам по тх, присоединяйся скорее! 2.𝗟𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗮 𝗞𝗮𝘂𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘇 — самый лучший канал с ахуенными ботами, розыгрышами на звезды и постам по группе Tokio Hotel!! Заходи скорее пока не удалили!! 3.самый комфортный канал с эдитам и прикольными интера…
Signed shaxi
𝕊𝘵𝕠𝑚𝗸𝙰 pinned «какой формат нарезок делать?»
.
Огонёк
👻1
Signed 𝔈𝔪𝔬 𝔍𝔲𝔫𝔤𝔢!^.𝔐𝔬𝔶𝔞 𝔪𝔞𝔩𝔢𝔫𝔨𝔞𝔶𝔞 𝔡𝔯𝔶𝔞𝔫
1 удобнее
👀2🕊1
Signed Gasanova #LMB #lunar
Photo, posted without a caption
👀1🕊1
какой формат нарезок делать?
- 153%
- 253%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Video, posted without a caption
честно таких в жизни не видела, и сейчас не нашла, может быть это ии, а есть фотка или что-то типа такого?
Video, posted without a caption
👀3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @narezkutoma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
какой формат нарезок делать?
- 153%
- 253%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@kaulin483 · 1192 postsnataliee::
@aafbotsangel · 3781 postINFO
@infostomka · 61 post𝙡𝙞𝙢𝙣𝙤
@limnolii · 991 post𝙇𝙊𝙑𝙀𝙍
@litlsideath · 2411 postвр. закрыт||𝑁𝑖𝑘𝑎 𝐾𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑧
@lovvtomkaulitznika · 3231 post𝗟𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗮 𝘃𝗼𝘇𝗱𝘂𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸𝗮
@SINDIAsss · 2471 post𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗸𝘀𝘀/𝗧𝗛
@trikssTH · 621 post𝒗𝒊𝒓𝒖𝒔𝒆𝒔 𝒔𝒌.
@virusskora · 1,3311 post𝙒𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙖 | РЕСТ
@woundtoria · 2041 postӃɌ𑀡Ѕ 𑀝ΑɌͲξɌ
@www_carter · 4101 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aafbotsangel · 3781 postabraam bekker
@abraambekker · 1181 post~ Ⲁʀⲓⲁ
@ariaaesthetes · 401 post𝐓𝐀𝐘𝐀 𝐁𝐀𝐒𝐊𝐄𝐑𝐕𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐄
@baskerville_th · 601 post🍓16§†råwßêrrɏ_gïrl08📸
@Brittssvvh · 1181 post♱Г𝖔¢п𝖔д¢†в𝘺ющ̷𝖆я/закрыт
@g0sp0dias · 1611 post𝙎𝙖𝙠𝙪𝙧𝙖
@karaixz · 531 post𝙆𝘼𝙐𝙇𝙄𝙉||𝟒𝟖𝟑
@kaulin483 · 1191 postпереезд
@kristen_670 · 1741 post𝙡𝙞𝙢𝙣𝙤
@limnolii · 991 postвр. закрыт||𝑁𝑖𝑘𝑎 𝐾𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑧
@lovvtomkaulitznika · 3231 postMambysya🐾
@mambyska · 761 post𝙎𝘼𝘾𝙍𝙄𝙁𝙄𝘾𝙀🖤🥀
@sacrifice483 · 2111 post𝗟𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗮 𝘃𝗼𝘇𝗱𝘂𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸𝗮
@SINDIAsss · 2471 postсплетни токио хотел
@spletnithhhh · 2,2921 post𝘀𝗵𝗮𝘅𝗶 𝗛𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗹
@toki0hote11 · 2501 post𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗸𝘀𝘀/𝗧𝗛
@trikssTH · 621 post𝒗𝒊𝒓𝒖𝒔𝒆𝒔 𝒔𝒌.
@virusskora · 1,3311 post𝐕𝐈𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐎𝐕𝐀.
@vivienova · 3631 post𝙒𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙖 | РЕСТ
@woundtoria · 2041 postӃɌ𑀡Ѕ 𑀝ΑɌͲξɌ
@www_carter · 4101 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝕊𝘵𝕠𝑚𝗸𝙰|нарезки Токио Хотел/запросы/боты” (@narezkutoma), 519 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narezkutoma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.