$CARDS listed on Upbit spot (KRW)・

Channel
나락도 락이다
@narockisrock1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,974subscribers
-570 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001830958061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @narockisrock1 |
| Created | 16 September 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/narockisrock1 |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:19 | 6,974 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:18 | 6,981 | -20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:18 | 7,001 | -24 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 7,025 | -14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:19 | 7,039 | -24 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 7,063 | -27 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:34 | 7,090 | -12 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:58 | 7,102 | -10 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 23:35 | 7,112 | -41 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 05:35 | 7,153 | -73 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 01:15 | 7,226 | -102 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 7,328 | -36 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 7,364 | -31 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 7,395 | -23 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 7,418 | -45 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:25 | 7,463 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 7,478 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 7,485 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:09 | 7,505 | -17 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 7,522 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 16 September 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.35%
- avg views ÷ 6,974 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 94.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (16 September 2023 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 94 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 84.5% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2023 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
이박사 - REDRED https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuTyEATkiFs
❤1
whatnot $545M 투자 유치 숫자가 다르네
WLFI와 USD1, 스테이블코인 시장의 게임 체인저가 될 수 있는가 https://x.com/i/status/2084202300768456838
환율이 이정도로 떨어지길 원한건 아니였는데...
❤3
WLFI USD1 2026 상반기 성과 총정리 멀티체인 네이티브 확장 - Tempo: 최초 TIP-20 네이티브 발행 (브릿지 래퍼 아님) - MovaChain: USD1 배포 발표 - Aptos, Monad: 통합 진행 중 - Solana: 시가총액 $115M → $1B+ 성장 거래 인프라 확대 - Binance: BTCUSD1 퍼프 5월 런칭 (100배, USDⓈ 마진) - Binance: ETHUSD1 퍼프 추가 - 현재 프로모션 기간 Maker 수수료 제로 - Aster DEX: 금/은/원유 마켓 쿼트 에셋으로 Tether 대체 기관 진출 - OCC에 USD1 발행·보관 전문 국가 신탁 은행 설립 허가 신청 - Apex Group: 토큰화 펀드 플로우용 USD1 파일럿 발표 - BitGo 통해 기관용 민팅 라이브 ✍️ 상반기만 …
도랏맨 위스키 후기 일단 주말에 같이 저녁 먹었다가 생각지도 못하게 선물받아서 너무 감사하구요.. 제가 처음인지는 모르겠는데 랭커일듯 맛도 좋고 첨에 오픈할 때 밀랍같은거 써서 밀봉하신거 보면 디테일에 신경도 엄청 쓰신듯 이런게 또 만족감 높여주거든여 도수가 68도 정도로 높은데 카발란보다 도수 높은 느낌 잘 안들구요. 목넘김 좋음 133병 한정이라는데 가격이 50만원 정도로 알고있어요 형한테 이것저것 물어보니 거짓말없이 돈벌려고 하는게 아니라 (애초에 개부자임) 그냥 순수 자아실현용으로 하신거같음 마진이 만원이라던데ㅋㅋ 고생하셔서 출시했는데 결과물이 라벨링도 멋있고 맛도 좋아서 기대하셨던 분들이나 위스키 좋아하시는 분들 사시길 추천! 조만간 구매 오픈하실듯
👍2
개귀엽다
@giyueth @Y_THEBEST 망한 카드깡 껍데기 재활용하는방법
❤2👍1
tcg가 미래다
1. 종종 얘기하지만 2. 초창기 세계최대 비트코인 거래소는 원래 TCG를 오프라인 샵 말고 인터넷으로 거래하면 호가 빵빵해질거같은 아이디어에서 시작했음. 3. 그 이름은 매직더개더링 온라인교환소 (Magic the gathering Online eXchange), 줄여서 MT.GOX 4. 마운트곡스를 만들고 거기에 비트코인 매매를 하는 아이디어를 구현했던 친구는 이 거래소를 초창기에 엑싯하고 다음 스텝으로는 코인을 만들러 갔었음 5.혹시 이 코인이 어떤 코인인지 아는 사람?
$CARDS
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @narockisrock1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@nicetomeetup · 7892 postsBrotherhood
@CH_Brotherhood · 4221 post뉴웨이브 2.0
@Newwaves_nft · 1,7671 post밥도둑 코리아
@bdddao · 1,8171 post중증코인센터 (Coin Trauma Center)
@cointraumacenter · 921 postDaniel Social Club
@danielsocialclub · 4,5321 post눈치왕 HOYA
@metakingHoya · 301 post주 100시간 코인중⌛️
@week100h · 1,6431 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“나락도 락이다” (@narockisrock1), 6,974 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narockisrock1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.