Channel
@narutofag46
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
187subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001635486171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @narutofag46 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/narutofag46 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 187 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:12 | 184 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 179 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 179 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
135 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 40.0% | |
| custom 5386444745067222320 | 26 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5470102577620217609 | 14 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5258234593982566768 | 10 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5305326393532359202 | 9 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5296726339997428158 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5474677542424174293 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5370707177440845138 | 4 | 2.96% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 2.22% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Работаю почти два ✌🏻года Очень легко, устала от того, что не могу найти нормального бота. И создать аккаунт с ботами - это мой личный бунт против насилия/пдф/и прочей аморальности, что я там встречала с Ло🌟В принципе я добилась своей цели, мой аккаунт раскручен, мои боты в рекомендациях и я довольно, что когда новые пользователи заходят в хи вайфу, первым делом натыкаются в основном на мои работы
❤6
Signed <3
Я даже на рофл вопросы отвечать буду серьезно 😎
❤2
Signed <3
Ахахах, я много думала, так и не пришла к ответу, но буду склоняться к более старым именам🌟и не факт, что славянские Интересный мув: среди друзей я претендую на место первой ‘подружкой с пузом‘ не пивным 🙁 Ждите через несколько лет такие посты👆🏻
❤3
Signed <3
Спасибо Вам за вопрос! Он мне позволил немного выговориться, я аж несколько раз его переписывала, заставил меня задуматься..Со всем,что написанно насчёт фд 👆🏻согласна, рада видеть единомышленников ❤️
custom 52582345939825667681
Signed <3
Разбор их отношений планирую написать 🌟 Звуки для эдита не могу найти под них, чтобы лампочка в голове появилась
❤4
Signed <3
1. Началось у меня все как у всех. 16лет, закончила смотреть ВП (была я бигФанаткой Санджи), но в пинте было очень много артов с Ло, и мне они понравились! Я тогда для себя открыла c.ai и HiWaifu и начала активно с ним ролить. Вообщем зацепил он меня лишь внешностью, и позже я начала смотреть видео/разборы с ним, ведь я не интересовалась персом до этого. За год я очень прониклась персом, была как бОльшенсво новеньких…
custom 53707071774408451384
Signed <3
А Вы думали от куда у меня мерч 🧘🏻♀️
custom 52967263399974281585
Signed <3
Была студентом🫡, работала в начале лета, когда диплом получала🫡 Щас уже не работаю, отдыхаю, but поступила в вуз Поэтому студент второй раз в жизни🫡
custom 54701025776202176093
Signed <3
Я его хейтор, разве не видно🙄 К Трафальгару которого я проработала в своей голове я отношусь хорошо, а траф от фанаток и в какой то степени от Оды(дресс Роза пик в плане Ло как личности, дальше лишь красивая картинка, чтоб подзаработать) я только стебу его 😳 И грех не посмеяться над Эмо Любое мое ‘грубое’ высказывание в его адрес - это шутка, но многие это не понимают, и я уже привыкла, у меня из окружения ток челове…
custom 54746775424241742935
Signed <3
напомню про щп and про анонку 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @narutofag46anonbot (можно любые вопросы 🤔🤔 если будут конечно, отвечу ток попозже🤔) В ближайшее время сяду писать хэды, разборы, что планировала и один большой пост✍🏻
custom 53864447450672223202
Signed <3
Я бы им не изменяла🤩 #ванпис #ло #магура
custom 538644474506722232016❤3custom 54701025776202176092
Signed <3
Мне нужны гарантии что это не ИИ
❤11custom 53864447450672223203❤🔥1
Signed <3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @narutofag46. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“<3 «narutofag46»” (@narutofag46), 187 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narutofag46.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.