Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,733–1,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 19:39
1,743
-3
11 Sept 2026, 18:58
1,746
+3
7 Sept 2026, 07:41
1,743
+4
31 Aug 2026, 07:34
1,739
-1
25 Aug 2026, 20:24
1,740
+5
22 Aug 2026, 14:13
1,735
-3
19 Aug 2026, 14:45
1,738
-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:25
1,739
-7
12 Aug 2026, 22:23
1,746
-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:21
1,748
-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:03
1,749
+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:19
1,748
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
22s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
43
31.4%
custom 5217586306233695889
31
22.6%
👍
25
18.2%
custom 5217518492995060987
12
8.76%
custom 5217622439793556266
12
8.76%
😁
12
8.76%
😍
2
1.46%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
14.3%
3 of 21 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
918
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
655
over 18 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwahL1e
1
4 June 2026
4 June 2026
2VtzqxatHKe
1
25 May 2026
25 May 2026
2W5zFGwGmb7
1
11 June 2026
11 June 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
ДВЕ СЕКЦИИ, КОТОРЫЕ ПОМОГУТ ПРОДАВАТЬ БОЛЬШЕ И ТРАТИТЬ НА РЕКЛАМУ МЕНЬШЕ
Можно бесконечно тестировать новые инструменты, спорить, «работает ли AI», или искать очередную волшебную кнопку в рекламном кабинете. А можно прийти на Стачку и послушать тех, кто уже проверил всё это на практике.
Секция
Контекстная и таргетированная реклама
Подробнее о каждом докладе тут
Секция будет полезна директологам, таргетологам, perf…
🎤 Этот пост сейчас найдёт своего спикера
Лето — тот ещё баг.
Кто-то был в отпуске.
Кто-то закрывал релиз.
Кто-то каждый вечер собирался отправить заявку на Стачку.
А потом внезапно наступил август 🤪
Пока мы продолжаем собирать программу, стало понятно, что некоторые темы хочется раскрыть ещё шире. Поэтому сейчас мы можем принять заявки по нескольким направлениям:
👨💻 Применение AI-агентов
👨💻 Python
👨💻 Мобильная…
На сайте уже более 50 причин приехать на Стачку 🚀
Любите заранее изучить, что вас ждёт на конференции? Тогда самое время заглянуть в нашу программу.
На сайте сейчас опубликовано 52 анонса докладов — и это только начало. Новые темы, спикеры и кейсы продолжают появляться.
Среди них уже есть:
💬 «Как настоящему разрабу пройти через лес с IT-волками»
💬 «Вайб-кодинг: джун или ИИ? Опыт разработки в банке»
💬 «Нам запре…
Есть один проверенный способ 😼
Купить билет на Стачку до 1 августа.
Потом будет дороже.
Программа уже собирается полным ходом, а цена пока ещё нет. Именно поэтому сейчас — лучшее время забрать билет по более выгодной стоимости.
Так что экономить мы вас научили.
Дальше справитесь сами 😏
Похоже, именно так выглядит человек, который успел купить билет до повышения цены ❤️
Смешно? Да. Но повод вполне реальный.
С 1 августа стоимость билетов на Стачку вырастет.
Программа конференции уже активно собирается. Сейчас в ней более 40 отобранных докладов от классных спикеров. И это только начало.
Когда программа будет полностью сформирована и опубликована, стоимость билетов станет выше.
Каждый год мы видим…
AI — ключевая тема Стачки. Но не потому, что это модно.
Кажется, сегодня про искусственный интеллект говорят вообще все.
Иногда даже складывается ощущение, что в любой презентации достаточно добавить буквы «AI» и доклад готов 😄
Мы решили пойти другим путём.
На Стачке AI — это не отдельная секция «про нейросети». Это тема, которая проходит через всю программу.
Разработка, управление, дизайн, контент и маркетинг
…
🐞 Небольшой баг, но мы уже пофиксили
В прошлом посте про видеоотзывы мы случайно задеплоили закрытые комментарии. Бывает 😅
Поэтому публикуем новый, теперь всё будет работать как задумано 😎
Под ЭТИМ постом можно оставить свой видеоотзыв. Но лучше сразу отправляйте его в сообщения нашего Telegram-канала — так мы точно ничего не пропустим.
А пока ловите фидбек от наших спикеров. Они уже знают, зачем приезжать на Ста…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @nastachku_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
IT STAND @ITSTAND_ORG · 151,441 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стачка [официальный канал]” (@nastachku_ru), 1,743 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastachku_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.