Channel
@nastavnik_fd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
849subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001753488245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nastavnik_fd |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nastavnik_fd |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 849 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 850 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 851 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 852 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 852 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 66.0% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 23.4% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwHQzGZ | 1 | 23 June 2026 | 23 June 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 1 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
#проанатомию #Месяц8 Клеточный метаболизм. Глубинная трансформация и работа с кризисами. Коллеги, пройдя через сферу равноправных союзов, мы подходим к самой глубокой и ресурсоемкой точке годового цикла. Если предыдущие месяцы были посвящены системам организма, то сейчас речь идет о клеточном уровне — о процессах, которые не видны глазу, но определяют обмен веществ всей нашей жизни: о кризисах, психологических пере…
#проанатомию #Месяц7 Иммунная система отношений. Партнёрство, контракты и равновесие. Коллеги, наладив внутренние процессы, мы неизбежно выходим во внешний мир — мир отношений. Но не всех, а значимых, равноправных, тех, где есть взаимные обязательства. Если предыдущие связи были похожи на нейронную сеть, то эти — на специфический иммунитет. Они распознают «своего», выстраивают границы и либо дают силу для роста, ли…
https://max.ru/c/-70940074169783/AZ8DoADjAWE Видео нашей студии здесь в канале МАХ
Мы все очень стараемся организовать учебный процесс. Рабочий процесс запущен. Аппарат на месте. Тетради напечатаны. Генеральный директор академии ну правда какой молодец! Юрий подключил аппарат к большому экрану, чтобы было видно каждому участнику♥️ Одно место у нас еще есть. Целый курс по эхокардиографии в записи и два дня очной практики. Я сама лично смогу подержать вас за руку. Очные занятия уже завтра в Моск…
🔥2
«Опыт приходит не до практики. Опыт приходит во время практики». Эту фразу мне сказала Елена Николаевна Власова. Тогда я была учеником первого потока по функциональной диагностике. Честно? Мне было страшно. Страшно смотреть на ЭКГ и не понимать, что именно я вижу. Страшно подходить к аппарату УЗИ. Страшно ошибиться. Страшно начать. Но именно Елена Николаевна стала тем человеком, который влюбил меня в функциональ…
🔥3
Video, posted without a caption
Не пойму...Телеграм чуть ожил? или нет? Повествование сейчас здесь 👉https://max.ru/join/peCCU7jY3rQnuDTZWpLBJGlCt2PQQHeLRUuQkspMzw4 Но Тг моя любимая площадка 🥰
И бонус, которого больше не будет: На этом эфире впервые за 2 года - продажи книг по терапии, кардиологии и педиатрии отдельно от курсов. Только 18 июня, только на вебинаре. Вебинар бесплатный, но нужно успеть зарегистрироваться 👇 https://dscgroup.ru/vrach-2026 До встречи завтра в 18:00. Приходите за часом для себя, близких и той мечты, которая уже заждалась. 💙 P.S. Регистрация займёт 30 секунд. А час, который вы…
❤2🙏2
Коллеги, у меня к вам вопрос неудобный… Вы когда в последний раз делали что-то для себя не между дежурством и приёмом, а по-настоящему только для себя? Читали книгу не в метро, гуляли с семьёй без мыслей о выписках, начинали проект, который годами ждёт в закладках? Если внутри отозвалось - мы с вами в одной лодке. 🚢 Я тоже всё время ищу тот самый «25-й час», но его нет. И быть не может. Есть система, которая осво…
Просьба пройти опрос. Займет минут 20. Благодарю♥️
Сотни тысяч врачей в России каждый день работают с человеческой болью, травмами, потерями, безнадёжными диагнозами и почти никто не изучал, что это делает с самими врачами. Мы говорим о викарной травматизации - состоянии, когда чужой травматический опыт постепенно меняет того, кто рядом. Это реальность, достаточно распространенная и практически невидимая в российской медицине. Сейчас у нас есть шанс это изменить.Сов…
❤2
С Днём защиты детей! 🌼 В детстве мир кажется огромным, а возможности безграничными: можно сколько угодно пробовать, удивляться и начинать снова и снова. У нас, взрослых, задача одна - всегда поддерживать и показывать, что всё реально, если сильно-сильно захотеть. И по возможности самим оставаться любопытными, смелыми и готовыми менять мир. Мы постоянно учимся у детей пробовать новое, идти к амбициозным целям и рад…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nastavnik_fd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто-то есть на связи?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Власова | Функциональная диагностика.” (@nastavnik_fd), 849 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastavnik_fd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.