Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Настя Бруно

Channel

Настя Бруно

@nastyabruno

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,207subscribers

-535 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648912311
TypeChannel
Username@nastyabruno
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 October 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/nastyabruno

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,20717,74217,474.57 August 2026 — 17,742 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,740 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,733 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,730 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,728 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,721 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,698 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,696 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,676 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,644 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,630 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,613 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,603 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,600 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,594 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,575 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,571 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,559 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,558 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,554 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,553 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,540 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,534 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,528 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,521 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,516 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,507 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,475 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,474 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,466 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,457 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,466 subscribers25 September 2026 — 17,443 subscribers4 October 2026 — 17,388 subscribers8 October 2026 — 17,363 subscribers12 October 2026 — 17,339 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,327 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,320 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,322 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,323 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,319 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,317 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,312 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,300 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,286 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,282 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,259 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,246 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,229 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,220 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,211 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,207 subscribers7 August 202629 October 2026
52 measurements spanning 83 days, net -535. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,127–17,822 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Oct 2026, 20:2717,207-4
28 Oct 2026, 18:5017,211-9
27 Oct 2026, 21:2017,220-9
26 Oct 2026, 21:5517,229-17
25 Oct 2026, 18:2717,246-13
24 Oct 2026, 20:4417,259-23
23 Oct 2026, 23:2817,282-4
22 Oct 2026, 21:5417,286-14
21 Oct 2026, 21:5117,300-12
20 Oct 2026, 18:1617,312-5
19 Oct 2026, 14:5917,317-2
18 Oct 2026, 11:2817,319-4
17 Oct 2026, 08:2617,323+1
16 Oct 2026, 09:2817,322+2
15 Oct 2026, 09:5017,320-7
14 Oct 2026, 13:1917,327-12
12 Oct 2026, 23:4117,339-24
8 Oct 2026, 14:3717,363-25
4 Oct 2026, 05:3817,388-55
25 Sept 2026, 15:4017,443first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,850 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,58753.3%
🔥83017.1%
❤‍🔥54511.2%
💋2655.46%
😱2244.62%
🥰1342.76%
🤣801.65%
😭360.742%
💘210.433%
👍170.351%
😍160.33%
🤔140.289%
🤩140.289%
😨110.227%
🎉100.206%
🗿90.186%
🍓80.165%
💅80.165%
👾60.124%
😈60.124%
4 further kinds90.186%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,850 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nastyabruno. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈2,970 views94 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Лучшие наряды Зендеи https://youtube.com/shorts/6VUGjjbqkPo?feature=share P.s. я не знаю, почему иногда телега не привязывает видео. Поэтому просто добавлю кадр из видосика.

❤79🔥10🤔4👾1

23 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈4,040 views247 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Так я охлаждаюсь во время съёмок. Когда голова «кипит», температура 25+ и нет кондея.

❤166❤‍🔥47🔥22💋10👾1🤣1

18 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈6,510 views322 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ногти в стиле Винкс🦋 Присылайте ваши ноготки или супер идеи для следующих маников 💅🏼

💋187❤78🔥33😍10❤‍🔥7💅6👾1

16 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈6,470 views323 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вайб Зендеи с премьеры Одиссеи.👀 Волнистые волосы, белое платье в греческом стиле и макияж «без макияжа». Кстати, какие образы из выходов Зендеи ваши любимые 👇🏼 присылайте в комментариии. У меня есть любимец который я думаю повторить, как думаете что это за платье? 😏

🔥211❤59🥰31🤩11❤‍🔥6💋2😍2👾1

15 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈5,650 views222 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Отправила сумки на днях♥️ Девочки, получательницы, надеюсь на обратную связь🫶🏻

❤156🔥48💋10❤‍🔥7🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈6,150 views421 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Решила сменить имидж, как Вам?

😱219🤣79❤‍🔥64❤14😨11🤔10👍8😈6

14 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈5,600 views254 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

То что у нас получилось снять 💫😅 Конечно я представляла, что все белки немного по-другому, но и так тоже хорошо

❤188❤‍🔥45💋21

14 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈5,810 views159 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Video

Поехали смотреть на звездопад! ✨💫 Из-за проблем с интернетом не могла выложить раньше😬 В общем мы поехали за город, взяли перекус, камеру иииии были готовы заснять красоту. В итоге засняли мы фигню 🥲 ладно не фигню, а звезды и Млечный Путь. Но вот падающих звёзд мы не зафиксировали,(парочку малышек все же удалось, но ярких которые мы видели глазами нет). И дождем я бы это не назвала так поморило немного. Насмотрела…

❤114🔥24❤‍🔥13💋8

12 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈5,530 views158 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Трендовая сумка этого лета, которая делает каждый образ запоминающимся https://youtube.com/shorts/k2psVSHimnw

❤108🔥36🥰7❤‍🔥5🍓2

3 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈7,920 views324 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Угадайте, что я делаю? (Подсказка есть на фото) И я тут решила поэкспериментировать с макияжами, покидайте свои любимые в комментарии или которые считаете оооочень красивыми😍 хочу получит дозу вдохновения

❤236🔥50💋21🗿4😍4❤‍🔥3👾2💅2

31 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC≈9,280 views160 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Всем спасибо за участие в конкурсе. Победительницам мы написали с нашего официального ТГ @brunoboutique Отправка за наш счет!

❤‍🔥107❤36🔥16💋1

31 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC≈7,730 views91 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Zlata 2. Юлия (@Fichbah) 3. Дарья (@Daria_P06) ✔️Проверить результаты

❤64😭19🎉8

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nastyabruno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Настя Бруно” (@nastyabruno), 17,207 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastyabruno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.