Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Наташа в шоке

Channel

Наташа в шоке

@nataVshoke

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

507subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002505802748
TypeChannel
Username@nataVshoke
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nataVshoke

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5075175127 August 2026 — 517 subscribers8 August 2026 — 517 subscribers14 August 2026 — 515 subscribers21 August 2026 — 513 subscribers28 August 2026 — 510 subscribers5 September 2026 — 508 subscribers13 September 2026 — 507 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 506–519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 04:57507-1
5 Sept 2026, 17:19508-2
28 Aug 2026, 03:54510-3
21 Aug 2026, 09:23513-2
14 Aug 2026, 07:24515-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:03517no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:18517first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2654.2%
🔥510.4%
🙏510.4%
❤‍🔥48.33%
👌36.25%
😁24.17%
🥰24.17%
👍12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC44 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4👌3

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фильм идет 2,25…оставайтесь на связи. Если не отпишусь, значит меня украл богатый шейх. А я против, меня дома ждут завтра))

🥰21😁1

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4

7 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC65 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Написать вам книги и сериалы, которые смотрю? Интересно? Или пошла я нафиг со своими советами 😅…

🙏54🔥1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

5 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

5 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC77 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отчет за два дня. Хорошо ем, хорошо плаваю, хорошо читаю). Скоро вернусь…

❤‍🔥4

4 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Вместо того, чтобы показывать хороший вариант, покажу вам лучше неудачные дубли. Вот это кажется простым элементом, да? А на самом деле, после нескольких хороших вариантов ноги уже подзабились, делать обороты стало тяжело, и честно скажу, страшно. А еще, в жаркой маленькой комнате тело уже не скользило по полу, который к слову, не предназначен для таких скольжений 😂 В общем, школа такого ещё не видела, всем спасибо

3

4 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ну что вам сказать, я вчера станцевала стрип Дэнс. Назвать это танцем сложно, скорее невнятная связка. Но я старалась. И мне разрешили сократить минуту до 20секунд, хоть и узнала я об этом только тогда, когда уже два раза посетила занятия и выучила минуту…Но вчера я правда выдохнула, сделала свое дело и решила: «все, ты справилась, больше никакого позора в кадре». Ан нет, теперь кадриль. Я хочу увидеть список всех ма

4 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC84 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это фото ничего не могло омрачить, кроме ….следующего фото 😂

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nataVshoke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наташа в шоке” (@nataVshoke), 507 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nataVshoke.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.