Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дубай🌴Семья | Рецепты

Channel

Дубай🌴Семья | Рецепты

@nata_lele

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

46,138subscribers

-2,058 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001210725198
TypeChannel
Username@nata_lele
DescriptionПо рекламе👉🏻https://t.me/Nata2236 Инста https://www.instagram.com/nata_lele?igsh=eG1kYXRiMW43YXRi МАХ https://max.ru/channel_nata_lele
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nata_lele

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

46,13848,19647,1677 August 2026 — 48,196 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,160 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,093 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,059 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,011 subscribers13 August 2026 — 47,973 subscribers14 August 2026 — 47,918 subscribers16 August 2026 — 47,865 subscribers17 August 2026 — 47,939 subscribers18 August 2026 — 47,908 subscribers19 August 2026 — 47,877 subscribers20 August 2026 — 47,835 subscribers21 August 2026 — 47,793 subscribers23 August 2026 — 47,763 subscribers25 August 2026 — 47,728 subscribers26 August 2026 — 47,688 subscribers27 August 2026 — 47,654 subscribers27 August 2026 — 47,617 subscribers29 August 2026 — 47,579 subscribers30 August 2026 — 47,544 subscribers31 August 2026 — 47,507 subscribers1 September 2026 — 47,473 subscribers2 September 2026 — 47,433 subscribers3 September 2026 — 47,383 subscribers5 September 2026 — 47,335 subscribers8 September 2026 — 47,253 subscribers11 September 2026 — 47,184 subscribers13 September 2026 — 47,112 subscribers14 September 2026 — 47,053 subscribers16 September 2026 — 47,007 subscribers18 September 2026 — 46,949 subscribers25 September 2026 — 46,798 subscribers3 October 2026 — 46,592 subscribers8 October 2026 — 46,478 subscribers12 October 2026 — 46,370 subscribers14 October 2026 — 46,335 subscribers15 October 2026 — 46,298 subscribers16 October 2026 — 46,277 subscribers17 October 2026 — 46,404 subscribers18 October 2026 — 46,401 subscribers19 October 2026 — 46,367 subscribers20 October 2026 — 46,331 subscribers21 October 2026 — 46,290 subscribers22 October 2026 — 46,268 subscribers23 October 2026 — 46,248 subscribers24 October 2026 — 46,234 subscribers25 October 2026 — 46,212 subscribers26 October 2026 — 46,197 subscribers27 October 2026 — 46,172 subscribers28 October 2026 — 46,243 subscribers29 October 2026 — 46,421 subscribers30 October 2026 — 46,384 subscribers31 October 2026 — 46,355 subscribers1 November 2026 — 46,317 subscribers2 November 2026 — 46,284 subscribers3 November 2026 — 46,260 subscribers4 November 2026 — 46,214 subscribers5 November 2026 — 46,173 subscribers6 November 2026 — 46,138 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -2,058. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,829–48,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 20:3046,138-35
5 Nov 2026, 20:1146,173-41
4 Nov 2026, 22:4546,214-46
3 Nov 2026, 20:5646,260-24
2 Nov 2026, 22:3846,284-33
1 Nov 2026, 22:0646,317-38
31 Oct 2026, 21:3646,355-29
30 Oct 2026, 20:4746,384-37
29 Oct 2026, 17:3546,421+178
28 Oct 2026, 19:4046,243+71
27 Oct 2026, 18:3646,172-25
26 Oct 2026, 18:3946,197-15
25 Oct 2026, 17:4646,212-22
24 Oct 2026, 17:3546,234-14
23 Oct 2026, 20:3546,248-20
22 Oct 2026, 22:5646,268-22
21 Oct 2026, 21:1146,290-41
20 Oct 2026, 18:1146,331-36
19 Oct 2026, 16:1946,367-34
18 Oct 2026, 14:5746,401first reading

Engagement

256 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.33%
avg views ÷ 46,138 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,840
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 256 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held256 (3 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total238,279
Reactions total9,628
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 16:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,360
Videos
≈4,170
Links
≈67

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 193 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

41,357 reactions across 255 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤21,74152.6%
👍9,02721.8%
🔥5,60213.5%
😁8161.97%
💯6541.58%
🤣6361.54%
🙏5601.35%
😍5351.29%
🥰3380.817%
💔2150.52%
❤‍🔥2110.51%
🤪2020.488%
😱1810.438%
😨1650.399%
🙉970.235%
🤩850.206%
🥴720.174%
🤔630.152%
👀370.089%
🙊270.065%
9 further kinds930.225%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 255 of the 256 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41,357 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 256 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 255 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nata_lele. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 256 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.17%
3 of 256 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,500
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,750
over 252 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjewc2z712 October 20262 October 2026
2W5zFHRnkeD13 September 20263 September 2026
CQH36pWzJqVJ2ABrxSdCYbkJK43fyaH2L9Hi7pF1LtZYTA111 September 202611 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 256 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 62 posts held from the last 30 days (1.61%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC539 views20 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Готовим с Давидом пиццу 🥰 Любим чтобы были грибы, колбаска, кукуруза, помидорки, оливки и сыр Прям очень вкусно получается 🔥 А вы с чем любите ?

❤20

7 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,210 views69 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Хорошего вам дня ❤️ Мы сегодня дома, а вечером поедем все вместе на ужин. Муж сказал, что повезёт нас в какой-то новый ресторан, так что сегодня я ничего готовить не буду 😁 А вот вчера пекла печенье. Сейчас покажу, какое получилось!

👍52❤13😁4

6 Nov 2026, 17:03 UTC≈2,120 views131 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Те самые вкусные, сочные голубцы, которые оценил мой арабский муж 😍❤️ Понадобятся 2 кочана капусты Для начинки: • Мясной фарш — 500 г • Сырой рис — 250 г • Томатная паста — 2 ст. л. • Масло гхи (топленое масло)— 1 ст. л. • Вода — полстакана • Зелень — по желанию • Соль и любимые специи — по вкусу. Если есть паприка, обязательно добавьте 😍 Для заливки: • Жидкий томатный соус — примерно 250 мл • Масло гхи — 1 ст. …

❤84👍31🔥16

6 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC≈2,110 views137 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

А вот такие голубцы у меня получились вчера, очень вкусные и сочные, муж и Давид оценили😍 Рецепт нужен ? ☺️

❤95🔥42

6 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈2,370 views145 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Очень давно не готовила пшённую кашу, а сегодня сварила и вспомнила, какая же она вкусная 😍 Сначала варила на воде, а когда пшено уже было готово, добавила молоко, сахар и немножко соли. Получилась в меру сладкая, и после такого завтрака я полдня чувствую себя сытой. Давид любит и овсянку, и пшённую, и рисовую кашу. А вот гречку с молоком я ему ещё не давала. Думаю, он бы не понял 😂 Для него гречка должна быть с ко…

❤99👍40🔥6

5 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC≈2,740 views138 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня готовила мальфуф 🥬 А у нас это голубцы 😁❤️ Мне нравится, как в разных странах можно встретить что-то знакомое из детства. Название другое, начинка и специи могут отличаться, но всё те же родные капустные листочки, в которые сидишь и заворачиваешь начинку 😂 Готовить их дольше, чем потом съесть, но как же вкусно получается 🤤 А вы любите голубцы? Часто готовите?

❤105👍25🔥8

5 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC≈2,900 views116 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Снова взялись за букварь 📖 Половину прочитали ещё полгода назад, а потом как-то забросили. Иногда думаю, не слишком ли я загружаю Давида. В семь уходит в школу, в четыре возвращается, ещё бывают домашние задания на английском. А тут я со своим букварём 😅 Хотя на игры тоже остаётся два-три часа в день. Но ему самому интересно читать. Встречает в букваре знакомые слова и фразы, которые использует в разговоре, и радуе…

❤89🔥14⚡9👍4

5 Nov 2026, 10:18 UTC≈2,840 views84 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Всем приветик ❤️ Вчера была в Дубай Молле, устроила себе мини шоппинг. А под видео мне написали комплименты по поводу фигуры! Многим нравятся мои широкие бёдра 🥰🙈 А мне самой, наверное, больше нравятся узкие. Мне кажется, у меня после родов бёдра стали шире. Ещё думаю: вот была бы осиная талия, тогда мне бы такое сочетание больше нравилось. А у меня талия не настолько выраженная. Хотя мужу, наоборот, нравится моя ф…

❤68🔥16

5 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC≈2,770 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Вы помните, мы сегодня в 18.00 мск собираемся в закрытом чате у Татьяны на встречу Путь в близость. Я иду. Кто со мной?

❤12🔥2🥴2

4 Nov 2026, 19:08 UTC≈3,060 views98 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Ну что за милота 🥹😍 Вышли немного погулять в парк, а там ща доп оплату можно поиграть с козочками, там их много очень, как и детей 🙈

❤81👍17

4 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC≈3,260 views112 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤91😍13👍4🥴4

4 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC≈3,450 views117 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Вот она жиза 😅🙈

🤪75🤣32👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 256 posts we hold for @nata_lele. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @nata_lele as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

daria_uysal Турция🌴🇹🇷
@dariauysal · 44,189
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
Zarema Rostov❤️
@zarema_rostovrezerv_1 · 238,284
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 11 August 2026
Бахара в Турции
@baharapp · 60,699
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 22 August 2026
Кристина Бошчех
@bo_kris · 63,226
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Diana_life
@diana_recepti1 · 42,666
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
Mariya_Allabyan
@Mariya_Allabyan · 65,161
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
Nani_life
@nani_life2 · 167,676
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
Елена @lenin_dom
@lenin_dom · 57,462
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дубай🌴Семья | Рецепты” (@nata_lele), 46,138 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nata_lele.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.