Channel
@natakunovich
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
158subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001951917075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @natakunovich |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/natakunovich |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 158 | +3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 155 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 154 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 153 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 151 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 151 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
273 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 31.5% | |
| 🥰 | 58 | 21.2% | |
| 🔥 | 52 | 19.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 43 | 15.8% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 5.86% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 2.93% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 1.83% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.10% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.733% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Наконец-то забрал свой экземпляр klk_zin❤️💙 Не помню когда в последний раз испытывал столько радости от распаковки мерча 🥹 Криэйторы и организаторы, целую ваши ручки, спасибо вам!!!!!! Очень радостно наконец держать это все в руках!
🥰13❤5
Сколько живу, всё не могу привыкнуть к стремительному течению времени, и вот сегодня мне уже исполняется 29 лет ✨️ Последние месяцы выдались тяжеловатыми, но я пытаюсь держаться и наконец-то отдыхаю на пляжу 🏝 Удивительно, но в этом году я смогла вернуться к фикрайтерству и хочу поделиться написанным, так что буду признательна любой поддержке: репостам, лайкам и новым читателям 🤲 ✍️ AO3 ✍️ Фикбук Спасибо всем, кт…
🔥6❤1❤🔥1
Все я устал, оригинал там выше в скриншоте, можете попробовать пересчитать травинки Размытие по гаусу конечно прикольновое, но всю картинку на нем строить было скучновато 😮💨 #study
👏11❤🔥6🔥4
Мой первый опыт с мошенниками в ТГ через попытку заказать коммишку, было очень волнительно 🥰 Очень торопятся скинуть денег, но что бы платеж прошел, ты должен сначала вернуть им якобы комиссию за перевод через зейл Будьте бдительны, котики 😔 Ps: все обошлось, не сразу, но все таки я понял что это развод
❤10🥰5👏1
Это был стадик для арта с кэйлюками и драконом
❤5
Не могу пойти потрогать траву но могу нарисовать траву
❤15
Мой слабый мозг каждый раз забывает, что я добавил анимацию в обнимашки, и поэтому я каждый раз пугаюсь, когда кто-то из них моргает
😁8
Смотрим так
File, posted without a caption
🔥13🥰6❤2
Не получилось да
Если я правильно загрузил конечно
❤2
Ну держите 🌚 Начинал на 14 февраля и рад что вообще закончил 🥹 Хотелось сделать что-то в таком же стиле как открытки в зин Смотрите внимательно и они посмотрят на вас 👁 #kaeluc #luckae #diluc #kaeya
🥰21❤🔥9🔥5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @natakunovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“natakunovich” (@natakunovich), 158 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natakunovich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.