Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КНИГИ•ИСКУССТВО•МОСКВА

Channel

КНИГИ•ИСКУССТВО•МОСКВА

@natasash_moscow

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

853subscribers

+124 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001908530322
TypeChannel
Username@natasash_moscow
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/natasash_moscow

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7298537916 August 2026 — 729 subscribers6 August 2026 — 729 subscribers6 August 2026 — 730 subscribers14 August 2026 — 737 subscribers22 August 2026 — 744 subscribers29 August 2026 — 754 subscribers8 September 2026 — 850 subscribers17 September 2026 — 853 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net +124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 710–872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 03:38853+3
8 Sept 2026, 11:37850+96
29 Aug 2026, 11:54754+10
22 Aug 2026, 19:24744+7
14 Aug 2026, 08:36737+7
6 Aug 2026, 18:52730+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:13729no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:25729first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,428 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤47133.0%
custom 519760566740111446121915.3%
👍18212.7%
custom 520649896841813819018112.7%
🔥15811.1%
custom 52827445292318157791228.54%
custom 5332792361497940102956.65%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natasash_moscow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC68 views83 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤21custom 520649896841813819019custom 528274452923181577919🔥12custom 519760566740111446112

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

5 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC131 views146 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Помните, как выглядел нельзя-мм, когда только появился? Никаких, сторис, рилс, видео, никаких текстов, только картинки и чаще всего еда, цветы и тд. Сплошные натюрморты. Кстати, что же такое натюрморт, раз мы о нем сегодня говорим. Термин натюрморт произошел от французского nature morte, что переводится как «мертвая природа». На натюрмортах обычно изображают окружающие человека обыденные предметы — посуду, книги, …

❤46👍42🔥37custom 528274452923181577911custom 53327923614979401026custom 51976056674011144614

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

4 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC206 views190 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Прочитанное июля Быстро подведем итоги. Месяц выдался продуктивный, прочитано 18 книг. Многое это перечитывание, захотелось Пелевина ранние работы вспомнить и 1 аудиокнига. По порядку: 1. Ричард Осман «Клуб убийств по четвергам» 1 кн. Не могу сказать, что серия увлекла, но у меня она собрана вся, возможно позже продолжу. Из книги готовила пирог. 2. Мэттью Уолкер «Зачем мы спим». Прочитала по совету, так как есть…

❤77custom 519760566740111446152custom 520649896841813819051👍10

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

2 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC192 views186 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Еще одна прекрасная выставка, которую я посетила в Санкт-Петербурге. К 180-летию Владимира Маковского музей Фаберже представил проект "Константин и Владимир Маковские. Любовь земная и любовь небесная" 📍Музей Фаберже, СПб, Набережная реки Фонтанки, 21 🗓️ 03.06.2026 - 13.09.2026 Стоимость: от 900₽ полный/ 450₽ льготный Аудиогид: покупаем онлайн 300₽ Прекрасная ретроспектива творчества двух братьев. Оба художники, н…

❤60custom 528274452923181577949custom 519760566740111446148custom 533279236149794010221👍6🔥2

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

2 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC146 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤10custom 519760566740111446110custom 53327923614979401029custom 52827445292318157797custom 52064989684181381905👍4

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

2 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC163 views83 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Теперь у КНИЖНОГО БРАНЧА есть открытый канал! Друзья, делюсь с вами радостью: у КНИЖНОГО БРАНЧА появился открытый канал в Телеграмм! Долго думали,как рассказать о том, что происходит в нашем закрытом литературном клубе. Чем мы живём, о чём спорим, какие книги обсуждаем. И решили: пусть будет место, где можно заглянуть за кулисы. В открытом канале я будем делиться: ✨афишей открытых встреч ✨ короткими заметками о к…

❤36custom 520649896841813819019custom 533279236149794010217👍9custom 52827445292318157792

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

2 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC145 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Искусство и литература — это не скучно! Привет! Нас стало намного больше и я хочу еще раз представиться. Наталия Сашенко, филолог, искусствовед, сооснователь и ведущая закрытого литературного клуба «Книжный бранч». И я обожаю делиться своими знаниями и открытиями. Знаете, что меня всегда удивляло? Как часто люди говорят: "Искусство — это не моё" или "Я не люблю читать". А ведь на самом деле, это просто вопрос под…

🔥7❤6custom 52827445292318157793👍1custom 53327923614979401021

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

1 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC152 views97 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Гусь-Хрустальный: город, где стекло становится искусством Недавно с девочками ездили в Гусь-Хрустальный (проект Марии Аносовой) — и это оказалось маленьким приключением, полным неожиданных открытий. Начали с завтрака в кафе «Древо фантазий». Название говорящее — интерьер действительно как из сказки, а кофе и сэндвичи отличные. Подкрепились и отправились покорять завод. На производстве стекла я впервые увидела, как…

🔥33👍27❤26custom 533279236149794010211

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

31 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC199 views169 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 519760566740111446147❤46custom 520649896841813819046custom 528274452923181577920custom 533279236149794010210

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

27 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC367 views183 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Недавно прочитала работу Линды Нохлин «Почему не было великих художниц?» Линда Нохлин (1931–2017) — американский историк искусства, критик и педагог, чьи работы стали фундаментом феминистского искусствознания. Эта работа исследует причины того, почему «величие» в артмире всегда принадлежало мужчинам. Вопрос «почему не было великих художниц» провокационный. Он предполагает, что проблема в женщинах, в их таланте или…

❤64custom 519760566740111446146custom 520649896841813819037👍9🔥9custom 52827445292318157799custom 53327923614979401029

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

22 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC326 views55 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤17👍14custom 533279236149794010211🔥7custom 52064989684181381904custom 52827445292318157792

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

22 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC318 views173 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Псков: архитектура, история и охота за барсами. Часть вторая Пока я изучала архитектуру, муж с сыном охотились за барсами, они оказались важнее архитектуры 😂 Гуляя по центру, зашли в сувенирную лавку. Там продавались значки с символом Пскова – барсом. Очень интересно, где барс и где Псков? И нам рассказали, что в городе можно найти их повсюду. Это как космонавтики в Калуге. Немного истории Первые известные изобр…

❤62👍60🔥51

Signed Nataliya Sashenko

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @natasash_moscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КНИГИ•ИСКУССТВО•МОСКВА” (@natasash_moscow), 853 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natasash_moscow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.