Channel
@natsecboogie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003695769997 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @natsecboogie |
| Created | 1 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/natsecboogie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 33 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 30 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 27 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 25 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 25 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 23 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 87.5% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Geolocation of CCTV footage showing the moment after a GAO/r drone dropped a munition attempting to attack the Estación de Policía in Iquira, Huila Department, Colombia. Work w/ @el6rin6o6aucho (2.6485577, -75.6360284) Source: @BluRadioCo
🔥3
Geolocation of Mayiza/CDS affiliated sicarios on a rooftop overlooking the town of Pichilingue, Sinaloa. There has been an increase in fighting along the Río Presidio areas. @GeoConfirmed Work w/ @VaqueroJoe y @el6rin6o6aucho (23.4546711, -106.2179104) Source: @mexicannarcos
🔥2
We already see criminals utilizing cUAS equipment as it relates to drone warfare throughout the globe. Drones & cUAS equipment being utilized for theft of drone delivered goods is something that these companies that use this technology for deliveries will have to plan against.
🔥1
Prediction time from us, as drones continue to become the tool of the future for delivery of goods to civilians across the globe, criminals will view this as an opportunity. Sky Piracy will become a global emerging crime as criminals utilize their own drones to steal packages.
🔥1
In the video shared by @VivoenMarte2 there are three total drops of improvised air-delivered munitions. The first drops a single IADM, while the second & third drops release two munitions. We are unable to tell if the double release is purposeful or an equipment/operator error.
A drone attack w/ improvised air-delivered munitions in El Fresno, Guerrero left four civilians injured including two children. The town is in Los Tlacos territory, but is right on the border of an ongoing territorial conflict between Los Tlacos & Los Ardillos criminal groups.
From @RedMasNoticias we have a photo of ammunition & equipment seized from ELN by Colombian authorities in Los Trozos, Colombia including a drone. The drone is an E88 Pro. This popular toy drone is manufactured by a number of Chinese companies & sold in various bundles online.
From @foro_militar we have photos of 69 IADMs that were found by authorities in the mountains near San Ignacio, Sinaloa. The IADM design has cylindrical bodies, 3D printed tail section taped onto the body w/ four stabilizer fins & a 3D printed nose cone is taped onto the body.
For those that follow drone use by non-state actors, there has been a lot to unpack from this past weekend: -Emergence of fiber-optic drone use by GAO/R in Colombia -Effective use of drones by FLA for their offensive Mali -Hezbollah’s increased FPV use against the IDF in Lebanon
From @adiscusion we have a photo of an improvised air-delivered munition/IADM that was in a truck seized by authorities in Concordia, Sinaloa. The IADM design has a cylindrical metal body w/ scoring, cut rebar taped to the body & four metal stabilizer fins welded to the bottom.
From @enfoqueinforma we have a photo of an IADM that failed to detonate in El Charco, Guerrero. The IADM design has a cylindrical PVC body, a tapered PVC tail section attached to the body w/ slits cut for four corrugated plastic stabilizer fins & a PVC nose section attached.
😭1
Geolocation of ISR footage from the military operation that caught key CJNG leader Audias Flores Silva/“El Jardinero” in El Mirador, Nayarit. @GeoConfirmed Work w/ @VaqueroJoe y @el6rin6o6aucho ISR Center Point (21.6231155, -104.3834266) Source: Mexican Government via @nmas
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @natsecboogie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@natsecboogie named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pernicious Propaganda” (@natsecboogie), 33 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natsecboogie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.