🚨Cool 4x plus on $CHILLBULL

Channel
NAUGHTY APES🐵🐵
@naughtyapescall
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,840subscribers
-65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001844099826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @naughtyapescall |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/naughtyapescall |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 1,840 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 1,842 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 1,847 | -9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 1,856 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 1,854 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 1,857 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 1,864 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 1,871 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 1,875 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,880 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 1,884 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 1,892 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 1,904 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 1,905 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 1,905 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 67.6% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 18.9% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.41% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.70% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨Sol play $RANDOM DHSZDhK97XVL8urhAqUQ93PNgDRY3aVzEeDGf3hKpump
🚨Sol play $CHILLBULL 7oukkatFpBE6LTGM2S4Qnz3QrKNByan6yLjn2odApump
👍1
🚨Sol play $FROGCAT HKnrP5SumLmVMfYcgnDuVhpVdKtq2hrnLtKuSif9pump
🚨Sol play $TAYLOR 7MkBrQ95PsZz4cL5kUmb19nMfwesbus5yr1Yefshpump
👍2💯1
🚨Risky gamble Sol play $HASHCAT CUzTjybX4p6LyQWo9PpUc4NgBPzENR27kWvwqPKmpump
👍3
🚨$1F916 smashed 6X plus in 1mins send it higher
👍2💯1
🚨Sol play $1F916 AmAJEw2AocdfUNLrbpB5mKgcKP757zqAMxTBU3Mvpump
👍1
Easy 3X plus on $X send it higher
$X sol play name meta d3GXUEB3ewK8CYcTH5rbhQEZg4m7utiNjXfjUArpump
👍2
🚨Almost 4x on $OHSHIT earlier looks like it is bouncing back
👍2💯1
$OHSHIT sol play FrQpP6MbaPADvvphXPsZPMCAAG2Q3ysUrtbCc9bgpump
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @naughtyapescall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Wick_Deadly_Calls_007 · 273 postsyumekocallz
@yumekocallz · 33 postsConanXcall
@ConanXcall · 122 postsCryptoqueen CALLS
@CryptoqueenCALLS · 2072 postsPythonPlays
@PythonPlays · 872 postscortezgems
@cortezgems · 252 postsstreetzdairdrop
@streetzdairdrop · 212 postsAMAHunterNews
@AMAHunterNews · 251 postApesJungleX
@ApesJungleX · 31 postCryptoDefiGemsOfficial
@CryptoDefiGemsOfficial · 191 postDCGamble
@DCGamble · 41 postLiltoshigems
@Liltoshigems · 1441 postLordsTrades
@LordsTrades · 1051 postOssyCalls
@OssyCalls · 2171 postchanneloflives
@channeloflives · 81 posthotdogschannel
@hotdogschannel · 31 postmilkingtime
@milkingtime · 241 postSOLPUNKS CALLS
@solponkofficial · 41 postspidercabaltrades
@spidercabaltrades · 41 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NAUGHTY APES🐵🐵” (@naughtyapescall), 1,840 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naughtyapescall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.