Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Soldi banconote

Channel

Soldi banconote

@ndbzh_ye

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,240subscribers

-1,120 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003281741763
TypeChannel
Username@ndbzh_ye
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ndbzh_ye

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

1.0 average views per post against 9,240 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.011%. Across the 3,595 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,998 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.49% and 14.2%, with a median of 6.56%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (11 August 2026 10 September 2026)
Posts measured133 of 133 published in the window (133 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled138
Mature posts only0.011% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers9,240 measured 10 September 2026
Cohortb3162:eng · 3,595 channels · p10 0.796% · p25 2.49% · p50 6.56% · p75 14.2% · p90 26.2%
Position in cohort0.000th percentile · 1/500 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.031% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,24010,3609,8007 August 2026 — 10,360 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,360 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,349 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,348 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,339 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,332 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,329 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,328 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,326 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,312 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,303 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,238 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,179 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,132 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,076 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,009 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,904 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,623 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,240 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
19 measurements spanning 33 days, net -1,120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,072–10,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 00:169,240-383
4 Sept 2026, 15:599,623-281
1 Sept 2026, 00:449,904-105
30 Aug 2026, 23:5910,009-67
30 Aug 2026, 01:3310,076-56
29 Aug 2026, 02:5210,132-47
28 Aug 2026, 05:1610,179-59
27 Aug 2026, 06:3510,238-65
26 Aug 2026, 04:0310,303-9
25 Aug 2026, 02:2810,312-14
23 Aug 2026, 16:5710,326-2
19 Aug 2026, 15:2710,328-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:3610,329-3
16 Aug 2026, 07:0410,332-7
14 Aug 2026, 20:3410,339-9
13 Aug 2026, 09:5710,348-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:3610,349-11
8 Aug 2026, 09:3710,360no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3110,360first reading

Engagement

166 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.011%
avg views ÷ 9,240 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
133 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
133
of 166 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held166 (6 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total138
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28m 07s
Average length
1m 24s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026

NEW: 🇺🇸 A Georgia man defrauded 6,000+ investors out of $165M via a Ponzi scheme promising 25% guaranteed monthly returns, per U.S. prosecutors. Telegram | Twitter

19 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026

OPINION: Samson Mow says JAN3's model points to Bitcoin hitting $1 million by 2031, driven by rising global debt. Telegram | Twitter

18 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

DATA: 🟠 12 of the Top 15 institutional shareholders of $MSTR added to their positions in Q2 2026. Combined holdings increased $1.2B. Source: https://x.com/Strategy/status/2089784456475287712

18 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

BULLISH: 🟠 Bitcoin is globally accepted as a neutral commodity. Liquid is just a layer on top of that 🌊 Adam Back on why that matters for institutional technology selection. Source: https://x.com/Liquid_BTC/status/2089731443370918151

18 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026

NEW: SEC Chair Paul Atkins says he remains optimistic Congress will pass the CLARITY Act, reiterating his support and offering the SEC's technical assistance. Telegram | Twitter

18 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC proposes new "Regulation Crypto Assets" rules to create a framework for investment contracts involving crypto assets 👀 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2089787721682182381

18 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

US SEC proposes new 'Regulation Crypto Assets' rules to establish an investment contract framework for crypto assets 🦘 Roobet – The #1 Crypto Casino & Sportsbook.

18 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC Chairman says "As the Crypto Capital of the World, the U.S. must and will lead." "With our new proposal, the SEC is taking the most historic step yet to modernize federal securities regulations for crypto assets." 👏 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2089804924620062948

18 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump hosts a White House crypto summit tomorrow with SEC and CFTC chiefs and top industry CEOs, as the CLARITY Act remains stalled. Telegram | Twitter

18 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

JUST IN: 🇨🇦 $1.8 Trillion Royal Bank of Canada just disclosed that it bought 46,001 more shares ($4.45 million) of #Bitcoin treasury company Strategy $MSTR. It now holds a total of 385,002 shares ($37.2 million). 13.5% stake increase by the largest Canadian bank. Source: https://x.com/BTCtreasuries/status/2089728738980487532

18 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: SEC proposes “Regulation Crypto Assets” rules for certain crypto investment contracts. Telegram | Twitter

18 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026

JUST IN: White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt says he's "truly optimistic and bullish" ahead of the CLARITY Act's September 15 procedural vote. Telegram | Twitter

Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @ndbzh_ye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Soldi banconote” (@ndbzh_ye), 9,240 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ndbzh_ye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.