кто-то послушал в Москве микстейп?
❤3
Signed nedonebo

Channel
@ndnb_blog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
877subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001486003234 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ndnb_blog |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ndnb_blog |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 877 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 874 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:59 | 879 | +10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 869 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 866 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 866 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
287 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 143 | 49.8% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 9.76% | |
| 🍓 | 27 | 9.41% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 7.32% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 6.62% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 3.14% | |
| 💅 | 9 | 3.14% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.348% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.348% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.348% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.348% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.348% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
кто-то послушал в Москве микстейп?
❤3
Signed nedonebo
надо конечно дисклеймер "очень депрессивная музыка" туда было прихуярить. но люблю эти песенки, всё таки большая часть моей жизни радует и вдохновляет что не только моей
❤14👍1🙏1
Signed nedonebo
nedonebo - помнишь? (mixtape) 2015-2016 сборник старых песен ч.3 СЛУШАТЬ НА ВСЕХ ПЛОЩАДКАХ музыка: birds die alone label: PRTVN Music поддержать
❤25❤🔥9👍8😐1
Signed nedonebo
опрос века
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed nedonebo
как думаете, что ждёт меня в перспективе ближайших 5-ти лет?
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed nedonebo
а так, в полночь завтра выйдет сборничек, напоминаю. посмотрим, как покажут себя старые хитовые песни на стримингах днём немного посплю после смены и поеду на студию записывать новый тречок, который выйдет аккурат под конец августа. начиная с него включительно буду учиться в форс и заёбывание песней в тиктоках, и там глядишь за полгода следующие какой буст произойдёт, чтобы весной мы встретились в Москве и Питере и …
❤7🔥3🍓2🤣1
Signed nedonebo
я думаю в целом мой кейс,так называемый, весьма интересный и нужный. я записываю свой недонебо рэп уже 14 лет, из них большую половину времени «в молоко», но моя вера и страсть не шатнулись, хоть и объективно, трезвым взглядом я отдаю себе отчёт - шансы-то не велики. но я продолжаю тратить деньги, время и нервы на своё дело и стараюсь это дело как-то развивать, чтобы выйти к стадии, когда это всё окупается и создаётс…
❤8🍓4😁3💊2🥱1
Signed nedonebo
какое же спасибо Господу что я рэпер
❤11🔥3😁3🥰2🤡1
Signed nedonebo
уже в пятницу 💔
❤7👍5🔥5
Signed nedonebo
хорошо у нас в балтоне, пока куришь сигаретку на балконе на местный колорит глаза разбегаются. слева чувак пытается поднять клад (не поднял), справа мужик пиздит другого, за то что тот ходит по падикам и пытается взломать чью-нибудь хату. и только сверху всё спокойно
👍7❤4🔥2😁2
Signed nedonebo
всеобщий хаюхай я сейчас скучный и молчаливый тут, прост перестраиваюсь под рабочий график жизни. самочувствие со спиной, в сравнении со здоровым человеком - хуйово, в сравнении с тем, что было месяца два назад - охуенно, поэтому в целом нормально. свой «креатив» и «творческое» трачу на тикток и инсту. немножко кринжую, но уже привык, ибо НАДО. В пятницу выходит новый мухтар, а к концу месяца будет новый сингл, и д…
❤11🔥2🍓1
Signed nedonebo
не могу перестать смотреть https://youtu.be/YNsBpTTC_aw?si=bflCX6BdYpOvKAZI
❤3🔥1😱1
Signed nedonebo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ndnb_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
опрос века
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
как думаете, что ждёт меня в перспективе ближайших 5-ти лет?
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“nedonebo” (@ndnb_blog), 877 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ndnb_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.