Channel
@ne9kawaii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
143subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003337897393 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ne9kawaii |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ne9kawaii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 143 | +8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 135 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 134 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 139 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 140 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 140 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 141 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
304 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5418384711745576125 | 89 | 29.3% | |
| custom 5240300730404861475 | 49 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5244667118712016547 | 45 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5289498223570875756 | 43 | 14.1% | |
| 🍓 | 19 | 6.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 5.26% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 4.61% | |
| 😈 | 9 | 2.96% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 1.97% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 1.64% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.987% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.987% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.658% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.329% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ne9kawaii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! У Кая девушка есть) @akiraa_vibee Вот она)🌷 ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 52894982235708757564custom 52446671187120165473custom 54183847117455761253custom 52403007304048614751
мила
custom 54183847117455761254
это всё рофельный айсберг, но ситуации +- правдивые. у нас администрация очень дружная, бояться не надо ‼️‼️
custom 54183847117455761259custom 52403007304048614757custom 52446671187120165477custom 52894982235708757561
хотите для контента кину айсберг ситуаций нашей администрации?
custom 54183847117455761258custom 52894982235708757566custom 52446671187120165474
ребят, в «психологии любви» сейчас огромный поток обращений. администраторы правда устают и физически не справляются. людей в очереди очень много. мы по несколько раз в день получаем сообщения в духе «почему так долго», «мой админ мне не отвечает» и тому подобное. хороших анкет приходит очень мало, и мы делаем все возможное, чтобы разобрать пользователей. такая же ситуация в слезах сакуры. часть администраторов ушла,…
custom 524030073040486147522custom 541838471174557612510custom 52894982235708757569
даже прем стики сделал для этого
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⛓️💥 как перестать привязываться к человеку? ⛓️💥 как отвязаться? привязанность формируется через три ключевых механизма 🔤биохимия - дофамин и эндорфины создают чувство безопасности и удовольствия от контакта 🔤 детский опыт - надежная реакция взрослого на потребности ребенка закрепляет «близость = безопасность» 🔤повторение - чем чаще мы получаем тепло и заботу от конкретного человека, тем сильнее нейр…
custom 541838471174557612510custom 52403007304048614755custom 52446671187120165474custom 52894982235708757561
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.
custom 52403007304048614758custom 52446671187120165473custom 54183847117455761253custom 52894982235708757561
ладно я девушка кая
custom 52446671187120165476custom 54183847117455761251
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52446671187120165478custom 54183847117455761257custom 52894982235708757562
остались ли тут те, кто до сих пор считает кая монстром, который готов слить любую инфу?? на свой страх и риск доверила ему одну ситуацию, свое самое больное место, буквально ситуацию, от которой при любой мысли мне физически становилось хуево, и он мог бы добить, но по итогу после диалога с ним я ушла со спокойно душой, получив отличные советы, которые наконец смогут облегчить мою жизнь, а самое главное гарантию, ч…
custom 541838471174557612511custom 52894982235708757566custom 52446671187120165475custom 52403007304048614752
няняня кис кис кис
custom 52894982235708757567custom 54183847117455761256
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ne9kawaii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
на какую тему вы бы хотели пост?
The shares total 203%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“кай” (@ne9kawaii), 143 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ne9kawaii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.