Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,583–2,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:02
2,590
-3
13 Sept 2026, 22:02
2,593
-4
9 Sept 2026, 22:19
2,597
-6
4 Sept 2026, 15:20
2,603
-2
1 Sept 2026, 03:05
2,605
-2
29 Aug 2026, 11:15
2,607
-2
26 Aug 2026, 01:42
2,609
-8
23 Aug 2026, 11:47
2,617
-5
19 Aug 2026, 19:08
2,622
-4
16 Aug 2026, 20:15
2,626
-5
13 Aug 2026, 11:18
2,631
-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:25
2,634
-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:31
2,635
-3
7 Aug 2026, 07:00
2,638
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:48
2,638
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 20 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 29s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,120 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
775
24.8%
👍
525
16.8%
😢
315
10.1%
🫡
302
9.68%
🥴
272
8.72%
❤
239
7.66%
😡
236
7.56%
custom 6046634128164524847
136
4.36%
🔥
123
3.94%
🤡
113
3.62%
🤯
45
1.44%
🗿
21
0.673%
🍌
14
0.449%
💯
4
0.128%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2024 to 18 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Цієї суботи десятки великих молодіжних та консервативних організацій зберуться в Києві, щоб протидіяти пропаганді антитрадиційного інституту та содомії, головна мета - чітка контрдемонстрація проти кінофестивалю "SunnyBunny" 🎥
Консервативний рух, праве ветеранство, націоналісти та громадськість все ще пам'ятає події минулого року, пам'ятає справжнє обличчя ліберальних злочинців, пам'ятає та збирається помститись
Мі…
🔥Анонс відкритого вишколу з тактичної медицини!
📍Місто Запоріжжя
⏰22 грудня (неділя)
💸Внесок від 150грн.
Програма вишколу:
-Практика накладання турнікетів на себе й побратимів.
-Курс допомоги пораненим в умовах бойових дій в різних фазах за протоколом ТССС (АСМ)
-Лекція про наш рух та нашу діяльність.
❗ Реєстрація тут
❤️ Права Молодь | Долучайся!
Вітаю друзі!
Ну шо, пропоную домовляться
• хто за повернення Неавторки кидає 100грн
• хто проти - 200
• радікальі запрєщающіє язьік кидають 150грн
😉Посмотрім скільки вас і поможем закрити збір
‼️УВАГА, ЗБІР!‼️
ЗАГАЛЬНА ЦІЛЬ:
2 000 000 гривень
МОЯ ЦІЛЬ: 30 000 гривень
ДЛЯ КОГО: тактична група «Реванш»
https://t.me/revanche_tactical
Збираємо на поточні потреби підрозділу.
Допомагайте також репостом!
Звіти тут
Банка: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/5QXqWzrS2x
Неавторка
Друзі, хочу повідомити деяку новину
Я призупиняю діяльність проекту «Неавторка» на деякий час.
Думаю, що повернусь до вас з новим форматом.
❤️Дякую кожному хто зі мною
Неавторка
Чого боїться гінеколог?
Що демографія впала нижче нуля, тому після перемоги ми не витягнем без мігрантів.
А ці психологічні проблеми жінок, проблеми з менструацією та ранній клімакс зникнуть коли в країну заїдуть чорножопі чи я якось не так зрозуміла?))
Неавторка
А ні, вибачте, він тримає оборону посадок займаючись там анальним сексом і сосеться з мужиками біля львівських церков.
Це інше.
За це можна і в святі записати.
Всьо всьо
Мовчу!
А ви помітили що про Пилипенка ніякі ботоферми не кричать в коментах «а пачіму он нє на фронтє, а лише дайот інтервʼю у студіях Києва після барбєршопу»?
Так зазвичай сруть справжніх військових що боронять країну а не гомоєблю.
А я от цей момент помітила.
Совпадєніє?
Нє думаю.
ЛГБТ - це гетеросексуали
Спідозні підори типу Пилипенка - святі
Нема сечі терпіти ці пекельні борошна…
Неавторка
👍88🥴29😁9💯4😡3❤1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @neauthorka1488. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@neauthorka1488 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@revanche_tactical named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Неавторка ✙” (@neauthorka1488), 2,590 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neauthorka1488.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.