Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 33 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,103–2,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 09:18
2,107
-1
15 Sept 2026, 07:19
2,108
-2
11 Sept 2026, 23:59
2,110
-4
7 Sept 2026, 05:58
2,114
-6
2 Sept 2026, 17:34
2,120
-3
30 Aug 2026, 15:08
2,123
-1
24 Aug 2026, 19:56
2,124
-4
21 Aug 2026, 03:41
2,128
-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:45
2,131
no change
17 Aug 2026, 13:30
2,131
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5253993781929202008
125
77.2%
custom 5253519454330966811
15
9.26%
custom 5359778981048493195
12
7.41%
custom 5240238706782117693
10
6.17%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 31 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Спасибо каждому за эту смену 😍
Пусть в памяти останется множество добрых моментов, а чтобы ничего не забыть, сохраняйте себе фото и пересматривайте видео со смены в группе вконтакте.
➿ Отрядные фотосессии
➿ Фотографии со смены
➿ Фотографии с фестиваля
Мы ждем вас вновь
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Все оставленные вещи будут храниться только в лагере. Забрать потеряшки можно в течение 7 дней с момента окончания смены.
Фото всех потеряшек в папке по ссылке
📍Адрес лагеря: п. Ласьва, ул. Центральная 33
☎️ Связаться с лагерем можно в сообщениях группы или по телефонам:
8 951 948 4725 — Анастасия, старший вожатый е смены
8 (342) 202-35-55 – офис лагеря
Сегодня мы провожаем креаторов и говорим им до новых встреч. Спасибо за эти две недели творчества и вдохновения. Желаем всем хорошей учебы и обязательно ждем каждого в следующем году 💙
Обратная связь по 5 смене ❤️
Пока ребята отправляются домой, мы просим вас поделиться впечатлениями о прошедших двух неделях в Нечайке.
Родители, расскажите о том, как прошла смена именно для вашего ребёнка.
📌 Анкета обратной связи доступна по ссылке: clck.ru/3MY5Y2
Это не займёт много времени, но ваши ответы помогут нам улучшить качество следующих смен.
До встречи в Нечайке!
Последние обнимашки смены. Легкая грусть и вера в то, что мы обязательно ещё встретимся. Спасибо за все то тепло, которое вы дарили нам в течении смены, креаторы. Вас всегда ждут в Нечайке
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nechaykacamp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Жесть Пермь @zhest_perm_59 · 22,663 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 20 September 2026
ЧП Пермь @chp_59_perm · 228,941 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 17 August 2026
Пермь с огоньком @permjtop · 49,568 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нечайка • Детский лагерь • Пермь” (@nechaykacamp), 2,107 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nechaykacamp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.