Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for не кирш

Channel

не кирш

@nekirsch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

342subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002749813204
TypeChannel
Username@nekirsch
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nekirsch

Growth

340351345.56 August 2026 — 348 subscribers6 August 2026 — 348 subscribers13 August 2026 — 351 subscribers21 August 2026 — 345 subscribers28 August 2026 — 340 subscribers4 September 2026 — 342 subscribers3426 August 20264 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 28 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 338–353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 05:58342+2
28 Aug 2026, 04:28340-5
21 Aug 2026, 02:02345-6
13 Aug 2026, 18:14351+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:00348no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:16348first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

162 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓5232.1%
🌭4527.8%
custom 53776688727510527972414.8%
🦄106.17%
custom 540669056806554650495.56%
💘84.94%
custom 521972154492994163163.70%
custom 541118161779847676863.70%
💊21.23%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 00:39 UTC149 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🖼

🌭24custom 54066905680655465049💘8💊1

27 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC180 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 537766887275105279724🦄5custom 54111816177984767684🌭2

10 Jul 2026, 01:25 UTC318 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

подписуваемся и отокуим миня на артфайти я тоже вас буду https://artfight.net/~kirsch 🫰🫰🫰

🍓24🌭10custom 52197215449299416316custom 54111816177984767682

4 Jul 2026, 22:29 UTC387 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓28🌭9🦄5💊1

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @nekirsch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“не кирш” (@nekirsch), 342 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nekirsch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.